Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,911 posts)
65. Those electorates, certainly Canada, was howling "No way!! Commies!!!"
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 03:57 PM
Nov 2015

until their leaders walked through the merits, stuck to their guns and got it done

Here's Canada's Saskatchewan (almost Vermont) story
http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/lwp/healthc.pdf

The CCF won the 1960 election, in spite of a well-funded campaign by doctors in opposition
to the health program. As the government proceeded to put its program into legislation through the
Saskatchewan Medical Care Insurance Act (1961), the doctors continued their campaign against what
they termed "socialized medicine." Accusing the government of "communism" and "compulsory state
medicine," the doctors warned that the province was interfering with their right as professionals to
practice medicine and was attempting to make them "salaried government employees." They warned
that doctors would leave the province rather than work under such a system. Finally, in a last-ditch
effort to force the government to back down on its health care reform, the doctors went on strike on
July 1, 1961, the first day the new legislation came into effect.

The doctors' strike in Saskatchewan lasted 23 days and gained worldwide attention. While
the doctors agreed to maintain emergency services and the provincial hospitals remained open with
reduced staff, most private practitioners closed their offices. Ironically, the mortality rate in the
province declined during the strike, primarily because of the decline in surgery.

While much of the national and international media condemned the doctors action, the local
media supported the doctors and demanded that the government back down on its program. In spite
of the local media's support, as the strike wore on public opinion in Saskatchewan turned against the
doctors. As communities started to recruit doctors willing to work under the health plan from other
parts of Canada, the local doctors' resolve rapidly dwindled. The strike ended with the new health
program still intact. The provincial government negotiated a face-saving agreement with the doctors
which permitted them to opt entirely out of the plan and bill patients privately. With over 900 doctors
in the province at the time, none chose this option. The agreement also permitted doctors to maintain
their own medical insurance companies as clearinghouses for the Medical Care Commission, though
these were eventually eliminated by the doctors themselves as needless duplication.

In spite of the controversial start to the Saskatchewan program, it quickly proved to be a
success. Within a few years, the Saskatchewan model became the prototype for other provinces.


That's the kind of progression Bernie is talking about.

And look:
https://qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-f3f51624680366b198b6c5dea8687621?convert_to_webp=true
US spends four times as much on health care per capita as the Czech Republic and has a similar life expectancy - one of the worst of the developed nations. That shouldn't be a hard thing to sell: the US is getting ripped off badly and the real American victims of the policy can't complain very loudly because they're either too sick or dead.

Between 2001 and 2014, 3,063 Americans died in terrorist attacks in America.
In that same time, 631,700 Americans died because they didn't have healthcare. I'm not exaggerating. Think about that number for a moment. And then convince me why I should accept "pie in the sky" tax cuts that won't stop those deaths without healthcare. If Bernie's leader, at least we're past the point of having to argue with the President about it. This is a disgusting travesty. With Hillary, she'll have to ask Wall Street what they think about it because unlike Bernie, she lacks the fortitude to take a stand and really save some lives. Hillary's policy is to kick that can down the road with tax cuts - and continue to let folks die.

I don't think that's a pie in the sky argument if the Koch Brothers and Wall Street don't own your leaders like they seem to own Hillary and Congress. The costs and life expectancies and deaths without health care are facts - the simple truth. The rest of the "pie in the sky" crap is largely smoke to cover for the fat cats siphoning money from hard working Americans that cuts their loves short.

Enough.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They are a big part of the problem, not the solution. Broward Nov 2015 #1
"Conservatives" like Bernie himself? BainsBane Nov 2015 #5
Political analysis over 5 years old. earthside Nov 2015 #13
What has changed to make single payer more viable now? BainsBane Nov 2015 #20
A Sanders Presidency! earthside Nov 2015 #26
How can a president implement single payer without congressional approval? BainsBane Nov 2015 #41
Still a downer ... earthside Nov 2015 #44
What evidence do you have to suggest otherwise? BainsBane Nov 2015 #49
Pragmatism is useful sulphurdunn Nov 2015 #80
I find it amazing that you are arguing against single payer. wow. nt Javaman Nov 2015 #113
All hope is lost. Might as well give up and settle for a Republican president since HRC would be in notadmblnd Nov 2015 #129
I am also, earthside. And how we accomplish this Duval Nov 2015 #117
pandering? DaveT Nov 2015 #74
There's the difference right there Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #82
Sanders has already conceded that it's not possible Sheepshank Nov 2015 #94
He says it is possible Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #118
Yeah, and by even the most generous estimates the next POTUS will have to contend with a Warren DeMontague Nov 2015 #124
That is a question nobody wants to answer, because the answer is toxic: arcane1 Nov 2015 #126
This right here. n/t ms liberty Nov 2015 #153
I'd rather support a candidate... CoffeeCat Nov 2015 #138
Back then no one wanted to hurt the insurance or pharma companies LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #36
That doesn't address my question BainsBane Nov 2015 #42
We're gonna try to pass single-payer in Colorado next year regardless of who thinks it's viable now Turn CO Blue Nov 2015 #149
Gee, he was hoping Vermont would demonstrate the point--it didn't. It failed BIG time. MADem Nov 2015 #39
Two things.... George II Nov 2015 #115
OOPS. I guess they forgot that. BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #54
Ouch. That's gonna leave a mark. Buzz Clik Nov 2015 #105
I keep seeing the same people re-cycle this article without connecting to its core concept... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #111
I remember during the whole HC bill debate that began from some on the 'left' right away. sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #2
What bothers people is that they have to figure upaloopa Nov 2015 #67
What bothers people....we have the rest of the civilized world as examples. We know how it works. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #87
It was a simple sell: Medicare "Part E for Everyone" Kelvin Mace Nov 2015 #84
Hillary will actually fight it ibegurpard Nov 2015 #3
Bernie Sanders on single payer BainsBane Nov 2015 #4
So that's why he wants to help build a mass movement to change that. Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #133
Maybe what they're admitting is Hillary isn't a good enough leader to get it done ... Jarqui Nov 2015 #6
Those countries had the electorates to get single payer. Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2015 #10
A Democratic controlled Congress wouldn't pass it either Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #22
Democrat controlled? Dont you mean DemocratIC controlled? randys1 Nov 2015 #29
oooooh good catch azurnoir Nov 2015 #43
So democRAT is the preferred way around here now? randys1 Nov 2015 #48
except that is not what he wrote - here's a cut and paste of the comment so you can review azurnoir Nov 2015 #51
Democrat should say Democratically...that is how we used to say it anyway randys1 Nov 2015 #55
no this is about about a rather weak sauce gott-cha type of thing at least IMO azurnoir Nov 2015 #57
No it isn't. Sometimes it's a red flag for a wolf in sheeps clothing. Lil Missy Nov 2015 #130
and sometimes a cigar is just a cigar azurnoir Nov 2015 #136
a slip? treestar Nov 2015 #121
Dont want to think so randys1 Nov 2015 #123
Are you sure? Democrat is a noun and Democratic is an adjective right? Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #125
Always say Democratically controlled, Democratic candidate, etc. This is how it has been said randys1 Nov 2015 #127
I'm not sure about that. It sounds weird to my ears to it that way Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #131
Senator Joseph McCarthy started calling us rats randys1 Nov 2015 #135
I don't know what the hell your talking about Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #137
I was just explaining who started this, whether you are familiar with it or not randys1 Nov 2015 #139
OK no problem. Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #141
THanks and I would never pick on spelling or grammar, I am terrible at both randys1 Nov 2015 #142
Mass movement? upaloopa Nov 2015 #71
perfect Hillary supporter DaveT Nov 2015 #85
How can you predict "facts"? Not having Single Payer is literally letting some Americans rhett o rick Nov 2015 #25
Until a large chunk of America's congressional boundaries are redrawn, at the earliest. Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2015 #34
You have no reason to believe that will happen any time soon. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #92
Rs control both houses in Congress right now. We have a jwirr Nov 2015 #28
It is pie in the sky randys1 Nov 2015 #32
plus a thousand. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #110
Reality has a liberal bias MaggieD Nov 2015 #50
Those electorates, certainly Canada, was howling "No way!! Commies!!!" Jarqui Nov 2015 #65
Yet he wasn't in 2009 BainsBane Nov 2015 #21
Thanks the article highlights the problem with 3rd wayers and DINO's azurnoir Nov 2015 #46
Huge +1! Enthusiast Nov 2015 #102
To dream the impossible dream... Gary 50 Nov 2015 #109
And in the 90s, Taiwan and South Korea eridani Nov 2015 #150
We are just repeating what Bernie Sanders said. Nice try though. nt BootinUp Nov 2015 #7
Does that mean you think it's "pie in the sky"? nm rhett o rick Nov 2015 #27
A full blown single payer? I don't see that any time soon, but, BootinUp Nov 2015 #40
At the current rate the ACA will implode before that. My rates went up 33% this year. How rhett o rick Nov 2015 #64
Canada's pie in the sky system mmonk Nov 2015 #8
And it's not just that either pinebox Nov 2015 #9
So the US is incapable of doing something other countries have accomplished? winter is coming Nov 2015 #11
It is "pie in the sky" if Hillary is elected. TIME TO PANIC Nov 2015 #12
They don't sleep at night... smiley Nov 2015 #66
Huge +1! Enthusiast Nov 2015 #95
Two of the three Democratic candidates have issued health care plans w/o Single Payer brooklynite Nov 2015 #14
Which would still leave millions uninunsired pinebox Nov 2015 #16
Which issue would you like not to be addressed while time is spent on Single-Payer? brooklynite Nov 2015 #17
you can't address the uninsured with the ACA pinebox Nov 2015 #148
BOOM goes the dynamite! Major Hogwash Nov 2015 #99
NO, but the health insurance and hospital and RX lobbies are so rich and powerful randys1 Nov 2015 #31
So Martin O'Malley is a sell-out as well? brooklynite Nov 2015 #33
So you think there is NO influence by the BILLIONS in healthcare on a politician randys1 Nov 2015 #38
My opinion is that a thoughful politician knows how much political capital was expended on ACA... brooklynite Nov 2015 #45
and so is the candidate they support azurnoir Nov 2015 #47
Well, once again, if the GOP gets to decide, you will have NO HC unless you have a job randys1 Nov 2015 #53
except it's already law the GOP tried 45 times to change it and can not azurnoir Nov 2015 #56
So you support the use of RAT...got it...BTW, you need to know that I point this out no matter randys1 Nov 2015 #59
Nice try false accusations can indicate a rather weak position azurnoir Nov 2015 #63
I know I am a first poster reallygosh Nov 2015 #152
When Hillary evolves they'll sing it's praises... think Nov 2015 #15
I saw that. Strange times indeed. Menshunables Nov 2015 #18
Whatever It Takes(tm) arcane1 Nov 2015 #19
The 8 hour work day and voting rights for women were once "Pie in the Sky". Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #23
Thank you. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #96
So is single payer right now treestar Nov 2015 #122
Clintonistas are already maple-baiting MisterP Nov 2015 #24
Hillary's in the bag for Corporate America. senz Nov 2015 #30
Single payer is not health insurance. -none Nov 2015 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Nov 2015 #37
Unpossible. bunnies Nov 2015 #93
Colorado is looking to get single payer, jkbRN Nov 2015 #52
I'd love to see it happen and it should happen, but I don't think it will happen any time soon. Renew Deal Nov 2015 #58
All They Know is the Status Quo- ruffburr Nov 2015 #60
It's called "Republican Lite" politics. jalan48 Nov 2015 #61
Unless Democrats start voting in off year doc03 Nov 2015 #62
Don't forget whining about taxes on the "middle class" ($250,000/year). nt Romulox Nov 2015 #68
Clinton supporters are calling it "pie in the sky" fantasy? blackspade Nov 2015 #69
+100%! Enthusiast Nov 2015 #98
It really is a self-fullfilling prophecy isn't it? They claim it can never happen, so they dont try n8dogg83 Nov 2015 #104
It is only a fantasy to those who support the corporate healthcare system we now have. onecaliberal Nov 2015 #70
Were such HRC supporters FOR single-payer... Beartracks Nov 2015 #72
"Sky?" Canada, UK, Australia, Spain, Taiwan... you say tomato. n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2015 #73
So all of Western Europe has had pies in the sky for the past three to seven decades? Betty Karlson Nov 2015 #75
It really is good to know the truth now in case Hillary wins the nomination. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #101
Republicans For Hillary! billhicks76 Nov 2015 #76
Virtually every other developed nation has it. It's a proven, efficient, good way to deliver JDPriestly Nov 2015 #77
How does saying other countries do it upaloopa Nov 2015 #81
If other countries do it, and they like it (Germany has had single payer or national health JDPriestly Nov 2015 #89
Hmm...what could be the difference between... brooklynite Nov 2015 #91
The support of the people can even overcome the influence of gifts of money by the profiteers. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #108
So long Elizabeth Warren? brooklynite Nov 2015 #112
Just keep it up. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #114
Ir the Kaiser is stupid and negqtive, there is no hope. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #140
Go Big or Go Home Dcoast Nov 2015 #78
Worry About Your Own Candidate Gamecock Lefty Nov 2015 #79
LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE!!! n/t tazkcmo Nov 2015 #154
Because they are corporate conservatives by comparison SHRED Nov 2015 #83
How very Third Way of them. AtomicKitten Nov 2015 #86
How do you get it? What is Bernie's plan to make it happen? Rose Siding Nov 2015 #88
Mass mobilization aka political revolution Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #132
So I've heard but that's pretty vague Rose Siding Nov 2015 #146
That sounds like a Republican response, not a Democratic response. Dont call me Shirley Nov 2015 #90
Right. If Slovenia can do it, so can we. grahamhgreen Nov 2015 #97
Don't fret about that Gman Nov 2015 #100
DLC/Third Wayers said the same thing about gay marriage in 2007-2008, and earlier. Zorra Nov 2015 #103
How? upaloopa Nov 2015 #106
Bullshit. Buzz Clik Nov 2015 #107
She or her supporters are on the wrong side of this. Duval Nov 2015 #116
Wow...just frickin' wow... Hepburn Nov 2015 #119
It is until Congress is made up of people treestar Nov 2015 #120
You mean majority? darkangel218 Nov 2015 #128
Because evan the democrats treestar Nov 2015 #145
Yah sure. Lol darkangel218 Nov 2015 #147
It is true. That is why no public option treestar Nov 2015 #155
Think what you want. darkangel218 Nov 2015 #156
I was just about to start a thread with the exact same title. Hillary want us to settle for less. reformist2 Nov 2015 #134
I mean look, it's true we can't pass single payer right now, that's why we need to organize Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #144
K&R! Segami Nov 2015 #143
HRC Supporters Are Doing The Bidding Of Their Ideological Masters cantbeserious Nov 2015 #151
Didn't we vote for pie in the sky in 2008 and 2012? Baitball Blogger Nov 2015 #157
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary supporters are ca...»Reply #65