Bernie funneled campaign cash to family members

[Jim Lane]

367. Your standard of intellectual honesty, or lack thereof, is duly noted.

In reading future posts of yours, I will bear in mind the "trend" that you have perceived and have on that basis adopted for yourself. In general, if anyone unenthusiastic about Clinton makes any post that is deficient under the normal standards -- honesty, consistency, adherence to evidence, the deprecation of logical fallacies, etc. -- then you will consider yourself freed from normal standards to that extent. In the specific case here, you consider it perfectly acceptable for a DUer to post a serious attack on a candidate for the Democratic nomination, even though there is no evidence for the attack and it is motivated solely by the poster's personal animosity.

While your position is somewhat startling, I appreciate your frank admission of it, which will certainly facilitate my future reading of your posts.