Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders is not a final candidate for Time person of the year despite winning readers' poll [View all]ljm2002
(10,751 posts)35. "Time ignored Bernie's internet keyboard warrior army"...
...now I ask you, was that nice?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders is not a final candidate for Time person of the year despite winning readers' poll [View all]
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2015
OP
Trump actually belongs on that list the same way Hitler would have in his time, for same reason
randys1
Dec 2015
#2
Time/Warner would rather honor a Fascist or a Terrorist, than a Socialist running against HRC
99th_Monkey
Dec 2015
#6
Hillary only got 1.4% of the popular poll for Time cover. Embarrassing to say the least
99th_Monkey
Dec 2015
#31
So what does that have to do with Bernie not being named a finalist by Time
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2015
#36
But in terms of suggesting that his 10 percent should have caused the editors' to include
onenote
Dec 2015
#64
what's funny is that you seem to think that voters in Time's poll are the magazine's readers
onenote
Dec 2015
#87
Hard not to be snarky when someone digs in against reality and facts as much as you have.
onenote
Dec 2015
#90
Thank you for that news, onenote. "16% for Miley Cyrus".. wow, readers sure like to pump up
Cha
Dec 2015
#76
people who read Time might care about more than politics, specifically the Democratic primary race.
Raine1967
Dec 2015
#72
I doubt there's much correlation between Time Magazine's readership and voters in its online poll
onenote
Dec 2015
#82
exactly right. it's no secret that the readers' poll is a "fun" poll with no impact on the editors
onenote
Dec 2015
#56
He has given hope to millions of Americans and people from other countries.
Live and Learn
Dec 2015
#105
So journalists should ignore the bad in the world and only acknowledge the good?
onenote
Dec 2015
#30
Only if you can't deal with the reality that sometimes bad people have more influence
onenote
Dec 2015
#39
Here's an appropriate spot to impart some wisdon from a fine J-School prof:
OilemFirchen
Dec 2015
#45
If you have a loayal cadre of followers willing to vote a gazilion times
Agnosticsherbet
Dec 2015
#95
Are people who support Hillary Clinton online, Hillary's "internet keyboard warrior army"? NT
Eric J in MN
Dec 2015
#53
It's sad that despite claiming millions of members, Hillary's Army spends their days snoozing.
reformist2
Dec 2015
#100
Interesting that the OP should bring out such vitriolic anger and petty insults.
Sheepshank
Dec 2015
#61
I vote for #BlackLivesMatter! "putin" really? course they will make some around very
Cha
Dec 2015
#73
So Time was really only looking for hits on their web site to sell more advertising.
Vinca
Dec 2015
#77
Why would they pick someone who doesn't come close to meeting the POTY standard
onenote
Dec 2015
#88
I wondered what all of that wailing was about! It was the sound of a thousand keyboard warriors
Number23
Dec 2015
#102
What is not surprising is how many DUers don't think peoples votes should matter. nt
Live and Learn
Dec 2015
#106