Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary should have never spoke at Citibank. Criminal banksters should be shunned, not legitimized. [View all]Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)73. We wait with baited breath for the equivalent of:
"we have given you people all you need to know".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary should have never spoke at Citibank. Criminal banksters should be shunned, not legitimized. [View all]
ljm2002
Dec 2015
OP
then I guess I should do the same with the two little jobs I use to supplement my income. Lie about
roguevalley
Dec 2015
#74
As Elizabeth Warren said, "If you don't have a seat at the table, you're probably on the menu".
Fuddnik
Dec 2015
#19
Grammar nazi - it should be "should have never spokeN". But yeah, her cozy relationships with
kath
Dec 2015
#21
I've done that. Maybe not in a headline to an OP, (don't do many OPs)but certainly when quoting an
kath
Dec 2015
#35
It's really not whether we "use" banks. It's more whether they "use" us - as in the sense of "own".
erronis
Dec 2015
#37
I think it's fair to say that the anti-bankster rhetoric is a little too robust. So I'd agree
Turn CO Blue
Dec 2015
#71
LOL. Good on Hillary for reaching out to big bankster criminals they are people and
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#59
That way she gets to attack "Wall Street" without actually naming any names. It's pathetic.
reformist2
Dec 2015
#62
No, it doesn't work that way. You can't hand a large check to anyone without paying taxes.
pnwmom
Dec 2015
#85