2016 Postmortem

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)

67. Bullshit misleading OP that should be deleted.

Reply to Attorney in Texas (Original post)

Wed Dec 9, 2015, 09:39 PM

Dec 2015

Have some honor.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

3 Points: Rubio is likeliest Repub nominee. Sanders beats Rubio by 4%. Rubio beats Clinton by 3%. [View all] Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 OP

In the poll you cite as evidence Sanders leads Rubio, Clinton leads Rubio as well. LMAO. nt LexVegas Dec 2015 #1

You're trying way too hard, Texas Lawyer...nt SidDithers Dec 2015 #2

Whereas the Clinton campaign is not trying hard enough. Ironic. Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #4

How hard should they VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #11

Probably they should work on the untrustworthiness issues. That would help. Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #14

Apparently trustworthy enough VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #16

So we know Rubio is untrustworthy in the eyes of some repubs...is your advice for him or Bernie? Sancho Dec 2015 #45

So hard core ideological socialists don't trust Sanders because he's not radical or purist enough Armstead Dec 2015 #52

I think that everyone needs to see from other's viewpoint... Sancho Dec 2015 #54

I'm not criticizing the author. Armstead Dec 2015 #55

I believe the young author has been very specific about his distrust - and it's not just ideological Sancho Dec 2015 #63

Seriously, you're presenting data in a way that's misleading. Whether that's intentional or not... SidDithers Dec 2015 #40

Excellent evisceration of this dishonest OP. nt SunSeeker Dec 2015 #64

Its intentional. DCBob Dec 2015 #66

Can you explain how Sanders is viable in a general election contest? Gothmog Dec 2015 #42

It's been given numerous times by me and others Armstead Dec 2015 #53

You are ignoring the role of money in the campaign Gothmog Dec 2015 #58

Interesting food for thought, but firebrand80 Dec 2015 #3

Jeb! has a good opposition research file on Rubio that will be used before NH Gothmog Dec 2015 #43

I heard that mistress story was nonsense firebrand80 Dec 2015 #46

It is still a little early to leak all of the good oppo research Gothmog Dec 2015 #56

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #5

If you are so sure, there is money to be had in the betting markets for people with your confidence Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #7

Interesting. What do the same handicappers say about Sanders odds? nt LexVegas Dec 2015 #8

Not much. I don't think anyone disputes that Clinton is the favorite and Sanders is the underdog. Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #10

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #59

6% to win the nomination; 2% to win the GE brooklynite Dec 2015 #37

Opposition research will bite Rubio brush Dec 2015 #20

There are definitely lots of rumors, but none of that smoke has lead to any flames so far (I hope Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #22

Hello. bigwillq Dec 2015 #13

Cruz is more likely than Rubio and a 3rd party sufrommich Dec 2015 #6

Cruz would be the most right-wing candidate ever nominated and he's pretty despised in his own party Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #9

He's running a carefully crafted campaign,he's ahead in Iowa,he appeals to sufrommich Dec 2015 #18

Agreed on all points. He still might be too far right and too disliked to win (at least I hope so) Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #21

If Trump has proved anything,it's that the sufrommich Dec 2015 #24

Maybe. Certainly the most enthusiasm is well right of the establishment. If Paul Ryan is the current Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #30

I think a Trump 3rd party run is too much like wishful thinking on our part. Kentonio Dec 2015 #51

It could be wishful thinking. I'm depending on sufrommich Dec 2015 #61

Do you use the same misleading dishonest tactics as an attorney? DCBob Dec 2015 #12

Do you mean the tactic of making a statement and supporting it with evidence? Then, yes. Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #15

Your "evidence" is suspect. DCBob Dec 2015 #19

You have links to the current polling, links to the polling aggregation and links to betting markets Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #23

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #49

Margin of error both ways. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #17

Polls have margins of error. Poll aggregation and betting markets do not come with a margin of error Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #26

We MUST get together behind Sanders. Hepburn Dec 2015 #25

More "we must nominate Sanders" baloney? MaggieD Dec 2015 #27

You're comparing NH for Bernie vs GE for Clinton. Easy way to ignore Sanders is down vs Rubio, too Godhumor Dec 2015 #28

I'm giving you links to all of the polling which is reported on Real Clear Politics and all of it is Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #32

You didn't give links to the aggregator Godhumor Dec 2015 #33

The link on the words "consistent trend" in the phrase "this most recent poll result is part of a Attorney in Texas Dec 2015 #36

You linked to NH for Bernie not National Godhumor Dec 2015 #38

Your kidding, right? AngryParakeet Dec 2015 #29

Yeah, said the same thing in post 28 Godhumor Dec 2015 #31

I suggest an even more dramatic spread... cosmicone Dec 2015 #34

Two reasons why those numbers don't bother me... brooklynite Dec 2015 #35

See post 28. OP didn't post an apples to apples comparison Godhumor Dec 2015 #41

Party candidate matchups are pointless at this stage Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #39

So you planning on fixing the OP at some point? Godhumor Dec 2015 #44

Here I can fix OP for you, since you've gone silent. Vs Rubio both Dem. candidates are neck and neck Godhumor Dec 2015 #47

Seriously he's double digits behind tell me again how he gets to beat anybody FloridaBlues Dec 2015 #48

Can you make a smart strategic decision? Android3.14 Dec 2015 #50

Own up and self delete or fix the OP and links. Seriously. Godhumor Dec 2015 #57

+1 MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #60

Am I to understand Sanders supporters now trust "corporate" polls? brooklynite Dec 2015 #62

Utterly dishonest OP. No wonder you renamed the links. That's the tell. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #65

Bullshit misleading OP that should be deleted. taught_me_patience Dec 2015 #67

I put no trust in predictwise Flying Squirrel Dec 2015 #68