2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Ring of Fire Video about Hillary Clinton's Legacy As Secretary of State [View all]chknltl
(10,558 posts)I admire your work and recognize that in any debate I would be horribly outmatched anyway. I listen in often to Ring Of Fire. When Mike Papantonio(sp?-now I am being lazy because I am at home on my computer), described himself politically his definition distinctly caught my attention. He almost sounded angry when he made the claim that he was not a Democrat-that he was instead an Independent. Now barring definitions of the Political description 'Progressive', I would agree with you that Mike is every bit the Progressive you say he is but the problem I am having is the fact that most of us ARE 'barring definitions' when it comes to the word Progressive. I swear my intention is not to be a nit-picker but how would we describe Pap-is he a Bernie Sanders Progressive or a Teddy Roosevelt Progressive or would he not even describe himself as a Progressive at all? The fact that he describes himself as an Independent works for me, I'm more OK with calling him what he calls himself than calling him something I think he is.