2016 Postmortem

jfern

(5,204 posts)

10. His campaign reported the problem just like they did months ago

Reply to R B Garr (Reply #8)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 05:04 AM

Dec 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I guess Sanders staffers are too young to think about Watergate. [View all] RandySF Dec 2015 OP

LOL, the first thing I thought of but mostly R B Garr Dec 2015 #1

Indeed, this was theft of Clinton campaign info. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #2

I guess Hillary supporters are too young to think about Hillary's top secret classifed jfern Dec 2015 #3

There was no top secret info on her servers. Deflection fail. nt SunSeeker Dec 2015 #4

Yes there was jfern Dec 2015 #5

BENGHAZI!!!#!1!1 SunSeeker Dec 2015 #6

You do know people died in Bengjazi? I really don't think their family mambers would find your Live and Learn Dec 2015 #29

Nixon didn't personally burglarize the Watergate 72DejaVu Dec 2015 #39

He authorized it. Listen to the tapes. Live and Learn Dec 2015 #40

Oh no! I denigrated Bernie! 72DejaVu Dec 2015 #44

Who knows? But, I do know it is wrong. nt Live and Learn Dec 2015 #45

May I suggest 72DejaVu Dec 2015 #46

Link jfern Dec 2015 #7

I see this data theft story has you bringing out the big deflection guns. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #13

I'm calling you hypocrites out jfern Dec 2015 #14

Hillary never stole Bernie's campaign info. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #17

Bernie never stole Hillary's campaign information jfern Dec 2015 #20

His National Data Director used 4 accounts to search her campaign info. nt SunSeeker Dec 2015 #23

It just said 4 accounts ran a search during that half hour jfern Dec 2015 #24

So they were searching for the nearest Starbucks? SunSeeker Dec 2015 #25

Maybe just Bernie campaign information jfern Dec 2015 #26

They used 4 accounts to search Clinton campaign information. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #27

The article just said there were 4 accounts that ran searches while the bug was in effect jfern Dec 2015 #28

Actually, we don't know that at all. What we do know is they never reported it like the Bernie Live and Learn Dec 2015 #30

Your attempts to distract from the snoopy Sanders staffer makes you look silly. riversedge Dec 2015 #33

My link involves willful misuse of classified information by a canadate jfern Dec 2015 #35

Stay focused on the content of the OP. riversedge Dec 2015 #37

Hillary Clinton's private server had two 'top secret' emails w4rma Dec 2015 #31

Such an obvious attempt at distraction makes your post look foolhardy. riversedge Dec 2015 #34

No, the FBI is not investigating Clinton. Deflection fail. nt SunSeeker Dec 2015 #47

Again with the bogus transitive properties of R B Garr Dec 2015 #8

His campaign reported the problem just like they did months ago jfern Dec 2015 #10

They accessed the data and got caught. R B Garr Dec 2015 #11

But in the meantime RandySF Dec 2015 #15

They probably didn't know what it was until they clicked on it jfern Dec 2015 #18

Yeah RandySF Dec 2015 #19

The vendor said it was inadvertent jfern Dec 2015 #21

Four user accounts? RandySF Dec 2015 #22

FOUR times they clicked..... riversedge Dec 2015 #36

So if I notice my neighbors back door is open 72DejaVu Dec 2015 #41

So Bernie campaign called the vendor Wed, notified the DNC for months. madfloridian Dec 2015 #9

That's already been done by the Sanders campaign's self righteousness. RandySF Dec 2015 #12

IOKIYAR has been updated 72DejaVu Dec 2015 #42

It sure will. senz Dec 2015 #16

The neoliberal/authoritarian wing of the Democratic Party needs to be taken out of power. w4rma Dec 2015 #32

the break in was not the story, daybranch Dec 2015 #38

OK then 72DejaVu Dec 2015 #43

Just a third-rate data breach. Nye Bevan Dec 2015 #48

I guess they also forgot about the burning of Atlanta in the Civil War Armstead Dec 2015 #49