2016 Postmortem

WillyT

(72,631 posts)

157. GOOD !!!

Reply to Ichingcarpenter (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 10:04 PM

Dec 2015

& Rec !!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

190 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Lawsuit has been filed!! [View all] Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 OP

I'm a Bernie supporter but I'm mmonk Dec 2015 #1

Why are you sad? (nt) bigwillq Dec 2015 #4

Probably because it's alleged that the campaign DID download information. nt MADem Dec 2015 #7

Not quite that simple. mmonk Dec 2015 #13

I agree that everything has not been revealed, but what they are revealing on ABC is horrible. MADem Dec 2015 #65

Please think logically. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #80

I agree with you GitRDun Dec 2015 #87

Who is 'reporting' that they reported? MADem Dec 2015 #91

Evidence Gathering 101! An important step in an effort to discover their exposure JimDandy Dec 2015 #126

I asked an actual question--and you replied with Junior Detective Snark. Why? MADem Dec 2015 #137

Perhaps because they got all they needed or wanted, and they were on the verge..... George II Dec 2015 #111

"...on the verge..." Fawke Em Dec 2015 #120

But that's how it works on the movies! Scootaloo Dec 2015 #177

SNORT. I really did laugh out loud at this! Fawke Em Dec 2015 #178

... Scootaloo Dec 2015 #179

OMG! Is that a Commode Door! Fawke Em Dec 2015 #180

I think you need to stop rofl-ing. MADem Dec 2015 #184

I think that company just violated federal law. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #185

That's not what the former supervisor of the computer crimes division at the Justice Department MADem Dec 2015 #187

Okay silenttigersong Dec 2015 #182

To be clear angrychair Dec 2015 #97

K&R (nt) Babel_17 Dec 2015 #112

What was the reason for four people to do dozens of keyword searches over a four hour period? MADem Dec 2015 #140

... questionseverything Dec 2015 #154

I can repeat the question if you didn't understand it the first time. MADem Dec 2015 #159

They admitted it. tecelote Dec 2015 #45

No. They DOWNLOADED material, they didn't just "look at it and report it," they stole a copy, MADem Dec 2015 #63

Turn on ABC!! WOW !! YIKERS>>> A B C !!! pangaia Dec 2015 #66

I'm going to just memorialize that. MADem Dec 2015 #69

Thanks for the heads up.. I corrected my typo from ABEC to ABC. pangaia Dec 2015 #72

I am not watching it either Samantha Dec 2015 #103

Well, too late now, anyway--but it lives online, I'm sure. MADem Dec 2015 #144

Upon information and belief is a legal term I have typed thousands of times Samantha Dec 2015 #156

And you can have one percent information and 99 percent belief. MADem Dec 2015 #161

Then, why did they report it in the past. tecelote Dec 2015 #68

I don't think this is as much about Bernie as his STAFF. MADem Dec 2015 #76

It already HAS bitten the DNC. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #104

And those can be "brigaded" as well. MADem Dec 2015 #145

You ask, "If nothing was nefarious, why the uproar?"... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #121

Ah, but what you are trying to do is called "Changing the subject" and it's a common tactic when MADem Dec 2015 #150

No I did not change the subject... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #155

Well, those cases petered out. They're regarded by most people--save those with a desire to "get" MADem Dec 2015 #162

Which makes my point... ljm2002 Dec 2015 #164

Perhaps it makes mine--Sanders will have his day in court, and the court just may MADem Dec 2015 #166

can't WAIT for DISCOVERY!!! nashville_brook Dec 2015 #176

I would guess party division. Such a waste. Gregorian Dec 2015 #16

It is. I don't see how anyone reading this could think this is a good thing for Sanders Number23 Dec 2015 #22

let this old lady tell you something, infants. This is what a REAL dem roguevalley Dec 2015 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author Mika Dec 2015 #29

And let this "infant" tell you something, self described "old lady" Number23 Dec 2015 #30

We're shaking in our wheelchairs !! pangaia Dec 2015 #70

you should. consider guiilt by association. schultz makes no bones but whatever makes you happy. :D roguevalley Dec 2015 #125

Wait,, I'm on your side... pangaia Dec 2015 #146

That's great! Exercise is good for the mind and body. Number23 Dec 2015 #169

I get plenty of exercise at the gym, on my bike and walking in the woods, thank you. pangaia Dec 2015 #174

That's wonderful too. Number23 Dec 2015 #175

Did you bother to read the lawsuit? chervilant Dec 2015 #71

The DNC breached their contract. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #106

No, they didn't. He's suspended, not terminated. MADem Dec 2015 #147

self described hillarian, this is going to blow up in their faces. She had two months to fix this roguevalley Dec 2015 #124

Yep, senz Dec 2015 #143

Are you having trouble keeping track? Number23 Dec 2015 #170

Are you speaking for yourself? You are a "self described hillarian" and you sport that avatar? MADem Dec 2015 #183

Hey senz Dec 2015 #138

Oh, I'm all for it. Gregorian Dec 2015 #33

I'm with you, "old lady." Jester Messiah Dec 2015 #48

+100000000000000! UglyGreed Dec 2015 #49

This old lady liberal Dem is with you all the way! n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #73

hugs, Hepburn. One of my old uncle's best friends was Hubert Humphrey roguevalley Dec 2015 #128

Happiest of Holidays to you, my dear Rogue! Hepburn Dec 2015 #131

My heroes. We have a shoe pin for Adlai. :D LOVED that man and roguevalley Dec 2015 #132

My first memory was working in 1960 for JFK Hepburn Dec 2015 #133

Yes. redwitch Dec 2015 #123

"Real Dems?" He couldn't be bothered with us for a third of a century. Whatever. nt MADem Dec 2015 #136

Like I said, they need an army of pick axes to find them, they're so deep in denial Number23 Dec 2015 #171

We've been devided for ages. Liberals are the red headed step child to third wayers. haikugal Dec 2015 #53

There ya UglyGreed Dec 2015 #57

I add my "AMEN!" Hepburn Dec 2015 #88

I hear you loud and clear UglyGreed Dec 2015 #101

Oh, SNAP! chervilant Dec 2015 #90

You are sad, I'm laughing at the IRONY.. OLDMADAM Dec 2015 #139

I wonder if the $120,000 paid to the Iowa Democratic Party is just for the Iowa database? LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #2

" rights of termination to cases of prolonged and volunt ary breach." Gregorian Dec 2015 #3

Excellent! He cannot treat this type DWS action with kid gloves. Shows he is not going to be bullied peacebird Dec 2015 #5

You know what? Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #8

Agree totally peacebird Dec 2015 #11

Why, he wasn't in it to win? pocoloco Dec 2015 #127

I don't think they'll win, particularly since it is coming out that they DOWNLOADED information. MADem Dec 2015 #6

Your time Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #9

OK. MADem Dec 2015 #81

DWS lied. The database contractor states plainly there was NO EXPORT, NO SAVE. peacebird Dec 2015 #15

Apparently there were dozens of keyword searches and downloads. nt MADem Dec 2015 #79

So Hillarys 2008 tech guy is completely incompetent? He didn't know data could be exported or saved? peacebird Dec 2015 #83

Look, I am uninterested in going far afield with who's who in this zoo. Someone from the Sanders MADem Dec 2015 #96

Let's get an INDEPENDENT investigation. Not Hillary's former tech guy & campaign manager peacebird Dec 2015 #105

I've no problem with that. nt MADem Dec 2015 #151

LOL. They have said and will say ANYTHING to cover their asses. We need a full independent audit of mhatrw Dec 2015 #18

They have evidence VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #31

Of course they have evidence. Clinton's Cronyforce vendor created the security breach and sat back mhatrw Dec 2015 #38

Thats not a crime my dear... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #40

LOL. A Clinton staffer wrote the program and has full unfettered access to the database! mhatrw Dec 2015 #50

Compiling evidence of negligence isn't a crime, either cprise Dec 2015 #61

Yeah I'm wondering if they weren't pulling a 'sneakers' type move Volaris Dec 2015 #114

This happens regularly in tech cprise Dec 2015 #163

Well at least some branch of journalism has some standards.. Volaris Dec 2015 #167

Apparently four Sanders people ran keyword searches and downloaded material. MADem Dec 2015 #67

They were caught defending themselves against a corrupt vendor. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #108

Really--and the way you "defend yourself" is to start looking for marketing info in Clinton's files? MADem Dec 2015 #148

Yes. You see what they can do with your data by seeing what you can do with their data. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #158

Come on. That's just absurd. Sorry, Not for a second do I buy that as an excuse. nt MADem Dec 2015 #160

Burnie shoots himself in the foot again workinclasszero Dec 2015 #10

Actually you better do an internet search Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #12

Thank You for That. Phlem Dec 2015 #64

See my post 15 peacebird Dec 2015 #17

Let's get those facts on the table then. nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #19

Paragraph 14 Hepburn Dec 2015 #14

Yeah but, paragraph 16) Gregorian Dec 2015 #20

That is true, but the issue is Hepburn Dec 2015 #23

I'm just playing. I agree. Gregorian Dec 2015 #39

The DNC looks dirty on this... Hepburn Dec 2015 #62

I'm sending this to my friends that have worked or been in contract. Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #25

Anything to get off this hook right? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #27

We shall see Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #34

I am a retired lawyer. Hepburn Dec 2015 #35

Thank you that's what my reading of the contract meant Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #41

You did a good job on understanding what is going on. Hepburn Dec 2015 #47

Daniel Sheehan...the Pentagon Paper and Karen Silkwood among other Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #52

Thanks for this analysis, Hepburn. elleng Dec 2015 #46

Heya...love the law, but love being retired! Hepburn Dec 2015 #51

I love it too, and do NOT love being retired! elleng Dec 2015 #54

I am fairly current, but mostly CA law. Hepburn Dec 2015 #59

IL admission, elleng Dec 2015 #74

Lead me on to it! Hepburn Dec 2015 #78

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251913855 elleng Dec 2015 #89

Hey, Ellen...thanks! Hepburn Dec 2015 #92

You're welcome, and I agree, elleng Dec 2015 #95

Thank you elleng Autumn Dec 2015 #115

You're welcome, Autumn. elleng Dec 2015 #116

What is your opinion on this asked down thread by another poster? Autumn Dec 2015 #117

DNC's still messing up. elleng Dec 2015 #119

Wow. That is scary, I fear the DNC may have just given the White House to the GOP in 2016 Autumn Dec 2015 #122

Dems specialize in such, elleng Dec 2015 #129

Boy did the some respond to this post besides Ichingcarpenter Dec 2015 #75

It surely is a major case! elleng Dec 2015 #107

Really? Where is the federal jurisdiction ? Gothmog Dec 2015 #58

First and second paragraphs: elleng Dec 2015 #98

Hahahaa.. VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #28

The "theft" of what exactly? What was "stolen"? How did this "theft" hurt Clinton or help Sanders? mhatrw Dec 2015 #42

They try in vain everyday to prove otherwise. nt. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #152

kick! Segami Dec 2015 #21

He better lawyer up! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #26

+1 stonecutter357 Dec 2015 #60

A cursory reading would suggest that they have cause for reinstatement... OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #32

What basis for redress for Clinton campaign? elleng Dec 2015 #37

For you and my other interlocutor: OilemFirchen Dec 2015 #85

Redress? How did the access of data the vendor failed to secure hurt Clinton or help Sanders? mhatrw Dec 2015 #43

i bet during the trial we will find more wrongdoing from the Sander's campaign ProudToBeLiberal Dec 2015 #36

LOL. A Clinton staffer wrote the program and has full unfettered access to the database! nt mhatrw Dec 2015 #44

Here is a clue: Hepburn Dec 2015 #55

It is poorly drafted and there is no federal jurisdiction Gothmog Dec 2015 #56

Call me prescient but about a week ago I started getting the Cleita Dec 2015 #77

Well, Bernie went and started one for ya! bigwillq Dec 2015 #84

This infighted, he did this, she did that elmac Dec 2015 #82

This situation will not even influence the primary bigwillq Dec 2015 #86

Low turnout do to disenfranchised voters elmac Dec 2015 #99

Think again. nt Duppers Dec 2015 #94

We will see elmac Dec 2015 #102

And THIS is how Bernie will handle the RNC Duppers Dec 2015 #93

anybody else catch this? Lazy Daisy Dec 2015 #100

If this situation gets worse elmac Dec 2015 #109

My thoughts exactly PFunk1 Dec 2015 #110

Bernie could be seen as the conquering hero. Motown_Johnny Dec 2015 #118

Clinton's top donors would rather have a republican than a Sanders n/t arcane1 Dec 2015 #130

IMO, you are correct. Hepburn Dec 2015 #134

I saw that, seems top me it says this vendor has a history of problems HereSince1628 Dec 2015 #113

Petulant whinge Tarc Dec 2015 #135

Bully for him. Isn't he the man. seabeyond Dec 2015 #141

I give it to no later than Monday noon before it's laughed out of court. eom MohRokTah Dec 2015 #142

Go Bernie. Truth to power. dinkytron Dec 2015 #149

I suspect this is going nowhere. DCBob Dec 2015 #153

Oh sure .... senz Dec 2015 #168

Yeah, maybe the whole thing should've been taken care of in-house. frylock Dec 2015 #173

I'm afraid Sanders' staff pulled the rug out from under him. MADem Dec 2015 #189

I think the four illegal downloaders could face charges. MADem Dec 2015 #181

I love hearing from Yahoo, who are yahoos. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #186

Awww, sorry--that isn't "Yahoo." It's ASSOCIATED PRESS, offered through that portal. MADem Dec 2015 #188

Bernie is our next president. Fawke Em Dec 2015 #190

GOOD !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #157

The "Clubhouse" kept the data from both candidates and The Second Stone Dec 2015 #165

Well, Bernie finally got Karma13612 Dec 2015 #172