Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It was reversed. Back in 2008 and you are correct Hillarys access was not removed. notadmblnd Dec 2015 #1
Obama also didn't make a crisis out of it. Renew Deal Dec 2015 #4
Impossible to say Renew Deal Dec 2015 #2
But see, Hillary won't be having people on her staff facing potential criminal charges leftofcool Dec 2015 #3
Want to bet no charges are filed? How much? Nt Logical Dec 2015 #6
I think we shall wait and see. leftofcool Dec 2015 #8
No charges will be filed. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #12
That's because Hillary's campaign would have cooperated immediately... MohRokTah Dec 2015 #5
Yes, stronger measures like Bernie suing them and they caved! Nt Logical Dec 2015 #7
The Sanders campaign caved in and finally cooperated. MohRokTah Dec 2015 #9
LOL !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #10
I imagine Clinton would handle it in a professional manner. Worked with the DNC instead of telling seabeyond Dec 2015 #11
I do have a hard time imagining Clinton's campaign losing access. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #13
I'm sure we would not have heard about it!! Douglas Carpenter Dec 2015 #14
What Sanders' campaign did was NOT "nothing." SunSeeker Dec 2015 #15
If only Hillary and her people could come forward so quickly about their long, long Douglas Carpenter Dec 2015 #16
It is Sanders who is playing the victim here. SunSeeker Dec 2015 #17
if one ignores all the facts - I suppose one could think that Douglas Carpenter Dec 2015 #18
Project much? SunSeeker Dec 2015 #19
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Imagine if the breach was...»Reply #6