Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: No surprise: Tech sites aren't buying DNC hysteria on breech [View all]TheBlackAdder
(28,355 posts)85. I am an IT officer for a major financial firm that white labels partner-client data. This is serious!
.
If you are handling accounts for internal clients, and perform services for partner-firms--
SECURITY BREACHES are NOT TOLERATED--AT ALL!
The fact that there have been multiple exposures of other client's information should warrant an immediate termination of the contract. Is is quite apparent that the vendor, and the DNC do not take the issue of data security seriously!
If you logged onto your bank account or credit card system and saw someone else's account information:
WOULD YOU KEEP THAT ACCOUNT OR CANCEL IT, KNOWING SOMEONE ELSE MIGHT BE SEEING YOUR INFORMATION?
.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Did you see the activity logs published by Time? Check it out - they took data, LOTS of it.
George II
Dec 2015
#83
I am an IT officer for a major financial firm that white labels partner-client data. This is serious!
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2015
#85
Any business that would not have a contingent BR plan in place, isn't trustworthy.
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2015
#103
It still doesn't explain why staffers accessed specific data about early voting states.
Metric System
Dec 2015
#2
Proof. No one would believe that Bernie staffers could access it without proof. And when you get the
LiberalArkie
Dec 2015
#6
The Sanders guy didn't "passively browse", he searched for early state voter data........
George II
Dec 2015
#40
Will an Independant audit be able to discover conclusively whether or not the Clinton Campaign
Dustlawyer
Dec 2015
#45
Maybe t.hey just querried for information in general, and some of it was Hillary's
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#62
And yet they added "bernie" to all the user names so everyone would know who it was.
arcane1
Dec 2015
#22
Common in IT. "Made the news" Someone has to fall on the sword. SH@T happens.
LiberalArkie
Dec 2015
#7
"We have no information at all on whether anybody from the Clinton side was doing the same thing"
arcane1
Dec 2015
#23
They were ready like clockwork. Even here there were cries of "crimes" within minutes.
arcane1
Dec 2015
#17
Keep in mind you're talking to somebody who is blaming this breach on Clinton
mythology
Dec 2015
#51
then it's likely that your neighbours will wander in to see if you've had a heart attack
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Dec 2015
#102
They found a hole the Clinton campaign might have been using all along. They reported it. nt
Electric Monk
Dec 2015
#65
This is the case where Debbie, The Chairwoman, wants to make Bernie look bad, since she
rladdi
Dec 2015
#82
As time goes by, I am distrusting Clinton more and more each day. Where was her campaign
DhhD
Dec 2015
#84
LOL. I can't believe that Bernie fans can even convince themselves of this nonsense.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#86
Not to mention the fact that it was Clinton cronies who caused the breach to begin with. nt
mhatrw
Dec 2015
#100
Oh, they're just silicon valley weenies who dont want to "cooperate" on encryption & web censorship.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2015
#114