Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: As of now, I am no longer a Democrat. [View all]Armstead
(47,803 posts)13. I think you're jumping 20 steps
IF it turns out that they stiored and used this information and IF it turns out that their actions had the support of Sanders and his top leadership (outside of the person or potentially otehr persons) you might have a point. But a lot of IFs you're are coming to premature conclusions on.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
141 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Personally, I think it's unlikely that he gave any orders or knew in advance.
NurseJackie
Dec 2015
#12
Moreover, he has been a Democrat since he began running for the Democratic nomination.
merrily
Dec 2015
#77
Time published the logs of their intrusion. They made up at least two new sign-ons...
George II
Dec 2015
#40
Considering the response was to a poster who routinely insults and belittles DUers
mythology
Dec 2015
#136
I thought about that now that the D is tarnished with the thievery of Bernie's campaign.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#9
It has also devolved into an entity that attracts and promotes people with whom I don't
Doctor_J
Dec 2015
#20
The level of drama on display around here the last few days is rather stunning.
JoePhilly
Dec 2015
#29
Probably but I'm a latte-swilling liberal working out of Starbucks this morning.
randome
Dec 2015
#38
Very sneaky! I hope Cali doesn't take the bait!11!!!1!!!1!11!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2015
#80
What sneaky? If the democratic party is "sleazy and corrupt" seems to me that some one that
boston bean
Dec 2015
#83
The OP already made clear she won't be voting for Hillary if she's the nominee....
Cali_Democrat
Dec 2015
#108
This Citizen Transitioned In 2004 To Progressively Independent After Volunteering For Martin Frost
cantbeserious
Dec 2015
#55
Big deal. I haven't been a Dem since 2008 and it doesn't change a damn thing. Unless of course you
seaglass
Dec 2015
#57
Karl Rove's approach was to attack the opponent's strength. Bernie's strength compared to Hillary is
TryLogic
Dec 2015
#69
I keep hearing about dems jumping ship, there must be loads of new party members backfilling to
Ed Suspicious
Dec 2015
#76
I live in a very blue state that would most likely go for Hillary if she's nominated.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2015
#104
I used to think that way, missed the election where our local school board levy failed by 11 votes
uppityperson
Dec 2015
#115
I agree. But my larger point was whenn 40% decide their individual vote won't count
uppityperson
Dec 2015
#119
To This Citizen - The Fight Is Between The 99% And The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks That Fund
cantbeserious
Dec 2015
#105
Since you asked (nicely) because I've had this hope that somehow the party will change if it has to.
PFunk1
Dec 2015
#137