2016 Postmortem

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)

56. It's twoo! The internet polls pwoove it!

Reply to Segami (Original post)

Sun Dec 20, 2015, 09:49 PM

Dec 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders: DNC Trying to 'PROTECT' Hillary Clinton From Her Primary Rivals [View all] Segami Dec 2015 OP

Howard Dean told MSNBC this morning RandySF Dec 2015 #1

The corp-controlled media likes Clinton. rhett o rick Dec 2015 #5

But this thread blames DWS RandySF Dec 2015 #7

It's crystal clear that DWS favors Clinton as does the corp-media which chose to donate to rhett o rick Dec 2015 #9

Because Third Way is not the Democratic Party. senz Dec 2015 #33

And didn't Dean endorse Hilary? Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #18

And all the campaigns are involved in setting schedule. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #21

Really? Two of them wanted more debates, and the other stated it was "open to more" Scootaloo Dec 2015 #29

That is only partially true. zeemike Dec 2015 #30

Really? So they think the Republicans should get so much more and at better times? highprincipleswork Dec 2015 #42

Then why have the Republicans been able to have several debates on weeknights? n/t totodeinhere Dec 2015 #51

That's the way I remember it, too. I haven't watched in years because I always knew far in advance libdem4life Dec 2015 #2

Almost every online pole after every debate, TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #3

Post removed Post removed Dec 2015 #8

Clinton supporters don't? TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #10

not to my knowledge dlwickham Dec 2015 #11

They just swindle billions from the American public. TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #12

we do? dlwickham Dec 2015 #22

But Sanders supporters do, to your knowledge? eggplant Dec 2015 #17

how else would he get 80%+ support in an on-line poll dlwickham Dec 2015 #24

Greater support, I would presume Scootaloo Dec 2015 #31

No, because scientifically designed surveys of random voters -- not self-selected fans -- pnwmom Dec 2015 #62

We're talking about this online polls, pnwmom Scootaloo Dec 2015 #64

I just explained why online polls are worthless. They aren't predictive of anything. nt pnwmom Dec 2015 #69

Why not? You understand the internet, obviously. artislife Dec 2015 #36

Well, I guess that's a shitload of supporters then, huh? highprincipleswork Dec 2015 #43

Come on Sanders, ... no one is trying to hold down viewership... that's bunk. I remember in 2008... uponit7771 Dec 2015 #4

I'm in Iowa and I see plenty of ground game... CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #39

I was speaking of SC and the southern states, I don't see any ground game from Sanders there uponit7771 Dec 2015 #47

And of course, you wouldn't... CoffeeCat Dec 2015 #60

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #6

. stonecutter357 Dec 2015 #13

Bernie didn't apologize for the DNC's punitive actions against him, nor the vendor's negligence Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #16

And he was promptly ignored. draa Dec 2015 #25

Well, everyone knows American's prefer a conservative, Wall Street Democrat anyway. jalan48 Dec 2015 #14

What's the margin of error? NurseJackie Dec 2015 #15

K & R Dont call me Shirley Dec 2015 #19

Is math a lost art nowadays? Tarc Dec 2015 #20

The time poll says that it's to be taken as a measure of inthusiasm on the internet. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #34

As opposed to outthusiasm? Tarc Dec 2015 #58

... Scootaloo Dec 2015 #59

Individual enthusiasm that can't be used to predict public-in-general enthusiasm. n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #63

Maybe you ought to call Time and fill them in on your astounding revelations Scootaloo Dec 2015 #65

They already know it. It's just some of their readers that think what they want to think, pnwmom Dec 2015 #66

I'm saying what the page with the poll said, on time.com Scootaloo Dec 2015 #67

Uh-huh. "From engaged people on the Internet" does not mean "from the general public at large." pnwmom Dec 2015 #68

The exact quote from time.com: Scootaloo Dec 2015 #70

Before I started "creeping on" you? My, aren't you sensitive? n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #71

Shoo. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #72

Nah. n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #73

Hillary is 3-0 on debate stage. DWS is protecting Bernie. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #23

Where can I get what you're smoking? TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #26

Reality is free. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #28

If you vote Sanders Health Care can be too. TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #32

Just because Bernie can't name a price doesn't mean its free. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #41

Can you cite any statement from the Sanders campaign about making doctors government employees? Scootaloo Dec 2015 #46

Are they not govt employees in the UK? JaneyVee Dec 2015 #54

Can you cite any statement by the Sanders campaign about making doctors government employees? Scootaloo Dec 2015 #57

I don't care how doctors feel about becoming govt employees. TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #49

And no one will want to be a doctor with that attitude. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #55

You sound like a Republican ... ThePhilosopher04 Dec 2015 #61

That's absurd! TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #74

I have had free reality before zeemike Dec 2015 #40

Almost too real. LOL! TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #50

From Hillary HQ, of course. senz Dec 2015 #35

LOL! TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #38

Well, we know you're totally free of bias Scootaloo Dec 2015 #37

You remind me of another poster who has gone missing... JaneyVee Dec 2015 #44

Oh? Who's that? Scootaloo Dec 2015 #45

It's pretty f'ed up when you chose to protect an adult against their own wishes, clearly stated!!! highprincipleswork Dec 2015 #48

The Sanders and O'Malley campaigns have known this from the start. senz Dec 2015 #27

Remember this, there are more people and many of them are not members Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #52

I seriously doubt it. HRC doesn't need the help. n/t Lil Missy Dec 2015 #53

It's twoo! The internet polls pwoove it! NuclearDem Dec 2015 #56