2016 Postmortem

pnwmom

(110,273 posts)

32. Because the audit showed that after the data became vulnerable

Reply to arcane1 (Reply #28)

Sun Dec 20, 2015, 09:52 PM

Dec 2015

only the Sanders campaign took the necessary "deliberate steps" to view the data.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Amy Dacey, DNC CEO, says Sanders staffer: tried to delete notes . . . to hide his activities. [View all] pnwmom Dec 2015 OP

Drip...drip....drip... JaneyVee Dec 2015 #1

For some reason the system isn't letting me fix the link, so I'll try it here: pnwmom Dec 2015 #2

The @ symbol is breaking the link. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #4

And the quotes in my subject line were making it impossible to edit at all. pnwmom Dec 2015 #7

It still isn't working, but at least the whole address can be read now. pnwmom Dec 2015 #3

a dnc ceo ... if they said the sky was blue I would roguevalley Dec 2015 #43

interesting dlwickham Dec 2015 #5

That will be blamed on Clinton too. Hoyt Dec 2015 #6

By whom? nt Chef Eric Dec 2015 #9

By conspiracy theorists. n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #10

Such as? nt Chef Eric Dec 2015 #11

You can guess that. pnwmom Dec 2015 #12

:-D NurseJackie Dec 2015 #14

I've seen quite a few conspiracy theories around here. Chef Eric Dec 2015 #54

Nor is accurate to conflate 'imply' and 'infer.' LanternWaste Dec 2015 #64

Thank you for the laughs! Chef Eric Dec 2015 #69

Was this a deliberate attempt to access and view the Clinton campaign's Chitown Kev Dec 2015 #8

They need to do something to get those numbers up, Amimnoch Dec 2015 #39

Keep beating that dead horse. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #13

What happened to the showdown that was supposed to go on last night? pnwmom Dec 2015 #16

Slap, punch, and kick that horse. Liquify it. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #18

Dream on. n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #19

Ouch. That's gonna leave a mark. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #21

Dead horse? New info keeps coming, more staffers suspended. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #17

No reason you shouldn't get some licks in too. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #20

The horse isn't dead. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #22

It is SO dead. You and your cronies rode into the ground. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #23

Me and my cronies? Calm yourself down. JaneyVee Dec 2015 #25

I'll calm down when you stop wearing a dead horse like a crown. cherokeeprogressive Dec 2015 #35

You should inform the many Sanders supporters starting OP's about the same incident KittyWampus Dec 2015 #66

I'd misinterpret it as a dead horse too if validating my bias depended on being inaccurate. LanternWaste Dec 2015 #65

And you just keep covering your ears and pretending they did nothing wrong. RandySF Dec 2015 #52

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz mind-controlled those staffers. It's the only possible explanation. randome Dec 2015 #15

KaBOOOOOOOOOOOM. I knew I missed something. Thanks riversedge Dec 2015 #70

Yes Bernie did well Andy823 Dec 2015 #24

This doesn't make any sense: Vattel Dec 2015 #26

It makes sense to me. They could see the staffer(s) had taken important campaign data pnwmom Dec 2015 #27

I guess they were so stupid that they thought they had to withhold data from the Sanders campaign Vattel Dec 2015 #29

Since Weaver was denying the truth -- that data had been taken -- why should they have trusted pnwmom Dec 2015 #30

Did they need to withhold their data to get an assurance in writing? Of course not. Vattel Dec 2015 #31

It appears that they did, since the Sanders campaign didn't produce it till Friday night. n/t pnwmom Dec 2015 #33

Obvious fail. Vattel Dec 2015 #34

And why only one campaign, if all campaigns' data was vulnerable? arcane1 Dec 2015 #28

Because the audit showed that after the data became vulnerable pnwmom Dec 2015 #32

Sanders called for an independent audit of the entire history of this IT relationship. GREAT!!! highprincipleswork Dec 2015 #36

Sanders, through his own campaigns actions,... NCTraveler Dec 2015 #37

OK, let them respond with a full independent audit of the whole history with this IT firm. highprincipleswork Dec 2015 #38

I'm interested in investigating the theft of Clintond data. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #40

I'm sure you are. But notice how one-sided that is. highprincipleswork Dec 2015 #44

What are you talking about? NCTraveler Dec 2015 #48

There were two known breaches of a firewall that is supposed to be solid and protected. highprincipleswork Dec 2015 #53

The DNC did agree to it. Going on right now by Kroll leftofcool Dec 2015 #59

No, there is only one known BREACH of a firewall -- that done by the Sanders' campaign. pnwmom Dec 2015 #68

Really? kenfrequed Dec 2015 #51

The timeline given angrychair Dec 2015 #41

The link you were citing has been superseded by newer information pnwmom Dec 2015 #47

It has angrychair Dec 2015 #49

Let's stop hear in from the people who failed to safeguard the data and get a full independent audit Bjorn Against Dec 2015 #42

There has already been an audit arranged, to be done by a mutually agreed upon independent co. pnwmom Dec 2015 #46

WHY did the staffers do what they did? I don't believe for a second Sanders knew what they were merrily Dec 2015 #45

There's an article about Uretsky at philly.com. Chef Eric Dec 2015 #55

thanks, but i will wait for the results of the independent audit restorefreedom Dec 2015 #50

KICK! Cha Dec 2015 #56

This is one of the reasons Sanders is going scorched earth. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #57

This isn't scorched earth. You'll know it if it happens. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #60

He is no longer standing for things, just against them. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #61

Scorched earth would involve Ms. Clinton answering lots of uncomfortable questions. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2015 #62

Thats what I was thinking. He needs to claim victim R B Garr Dec 2015 #63

Put to bed until there is an "independent" audit rather than he said/she said. EndElectoral Dec 2015 #58

Donna Brazille said there was evidence of files R B Garr Dec 2015 #67