Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
15. Couldn't find the link for that on a quick search (it is out there, on my honor)
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 11:15 AM
Dec 2015

But, there is this from politico:

For now, the Clinton campaign remains in favor of keeping the number of debates low, say people familiar with Brooklyn’s thinking, to avoid squandering her advantage as the best-known Democrat in the race — and to limit the opportunities for her rivals to rattle her on television


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-dnc-debates-2016-wasserman-schultz-213667

Or how about 2008 when she advocated for fewer debates:



I think her position is somewhat clear. Others may differ.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The problem with the cons...»Reply #15