Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: DWS Is Rat F-ing Our Party And Bernie At The Same Time - Scheduling Debates For Low Viewership [View all]whatthehey
(3,660 posts)100. Sure - will you admit I'm right publicly if I provide?
If not you can Google it yourself easily enough.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
DWS Is Rat F-ing Our Party And Bernie At The Same Time - Scheduling Debates For Low Viewership [View all]
KamaAina
Dec 2015
OP
This OP is your's, regardless of how you frame it. Repost, or original with a link.
MeNMyVolt
Dec 2015
#101
Saturday night before Christmas is a shitty time for a debate. You know it. I know it.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#4
Moving this up....The 3 broadcast networks set the date. There are all sorts of negotiations
Gloria
Dec 2015
#105
You and I both know that if the plan is to get viewers you don't schedule your show
rateyes
Dec 2015
#69
18 million viewers or 6 million viewers. Who's message got to more of the American people?
think
Dec 2015
#48
It was a pretty simple question but it is understandable why you'd choose to avoid it.
think
Dec 2015
#63
The fact that Saturday night was a shitty night for this event is NOT up for debate.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#66
And how is it that I "lose"? For that matter, what is it that I "lose"?
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#45
The people who wanted to see it saw it. Those that didn't want to see it didn't.
George II
Dec 2015
#71
How does that differ from what I said? You really think that someone who isn't interested.....
George II
Dec 2015
#80
Indeed. The GOP got much higher ratings due to way better scheduling. Anyone who's being honest
think
Dec 2015
#25
They won't because we're in primary season and even if something is the blatant
PatrickforO
Dec 2015
#31
Yes, but in a caucus can't the caucus goers pick their 2nd desired choice?
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#20
Jon you are correct about the Iowa caucuses. If your candidate isn't viable, you move to
emulatorloo
Dec 2015
#56
And you're qualified to tell the other poster he/she doesn't know his/her own heart?
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#59
I now see how it can be read either way. Can you see the same? I know you can--you're a wordsmith.
DisgustipatedinCA
Dec 2015
#68
And while some are distracted fighting the hapless Republicons the real enemy is looting
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#33
"The game is rigged and you pieces of trash better sit down and start eating that shit up"
BlueJazz
Dec 2015
#34
when she was on stephanie miller show she laughed when hackable voting machines were
saturnsring
Dec 2015
#82
The last GOP debate got 18 million viewers. The last Dem debate got 6 million viewers.
think
Dec 2015
#44
You can be for or against Hillary, for or against Bernie... but DWS is a LOSER and a cancer.
Still In Wisconsin
Dec 2015
#89