2016 Postmortem

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)

2. No Bernie has not... And most likely won't.

Reply to Cali_Democrat (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 24, 2015, 04:33 PM

Dec 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

114 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders DID NOT agree to a KROLL AUDIT -- hat tip 99th_Monkey [View all] grasswire Dec 2015 OP

He did agree to an audit. Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #1

No Bernie has not... And most likely won't. Agschmid Dec 2015 #2

READ THE OP grasswire Dec 2015 #3

The OP does not support the claims being made Gothmog Dec 2015 #105

Speaking of proof ... exactly what "proof" do you have, other than ONE Politico sentence 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #6

My point is that Bernie agreed to an audit and never objected to the company carrying out the audit Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #10

PRESUMPTION grasswire Dec 2015 #15

you are the one making up the story Sanders objected to the company. KittyWampus Dec 2015 #68

The presumption is that... PosterChild Dec 2015 #78

Where is the objection by the Sanders campaign? Gothmog Dec 2015 #106

another PRESUMPTION grasswire Dec 2015 #16

We have to prove a negative to you now? Seriously? KittyWampus Dec 2015 #69

I like how grasswire replied to neither of your posts in this subthread. JunkyardAngel83 Dec 2015 #91

more likely 2pooped2pop Dec 2015 #21

as we know agreeing to anything in principle is exactly like stupidicus Dec 2015 #25

True. nt senz Dec 2015 #60

I wonder why Sanders supporters would be suspicious of dirty tricks. The Oligarchy rhett o rick Dec 2015 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author Purrfessor Dec 2015 #53

The OP is arguing that he agreed to that particular audit, as another OP proclaimed. artislife Dec 2015 #71

I noticed that too. Wilms Dec 2015 #4

Exactly!! and thank you for pointing that out. This lie needs to be stopped 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #7

He will be asked at some point soon. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #5

It is NOT a CT to assert that a Kroll audit is like assigning the Fox to guard the Henhouse. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #11

just like the msm 2pooped2pop Dec 2015 #22

As the race gets closer I am afraid we'll see more and more dirty tricks. The Oligarchy has rhett o rick Dec 2015 #35

+ 1 Sums it up. senz Dec 2015 #61

Rest assured, the oligarchs will stop at nothing. RufusTFirefly Dec 2015 #64

Thanks grass wire. That's how I read it to. haikugal Dec 2015 #8

I can't imagine that the Sanders campaign would like Kroll at all. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #9

Yes. Kroll is a corporatist "fixer", full of spooks-for-hire to "prove" whatever ... 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #12

That seems fair. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #43

Why is DWS/DNC living in the 20th century? aspirant Dec 2015 #13

DURec for the TRUTH. bvar22 Dec 2015 #14

Audit truthers. Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #17

it just gets more and more ridiculous. Any company that was chosen would be suspect KittyWampus Dec 2015 #70

Mmm hmm. JunkyardAngel83 Dec 2015 #92

yep grasswire Dec 2015 #19

Yeah, he did agree. If he didn't agree, he would have piped up by now. MADem Dec 2015 #18

We simply do NOT yet know. I have NO reason to believe Sanders has agreed to Kroll. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #24

see my post #20 nt grasswire Dec 2015 #28

That could be the case. The fact that the lawsuit has not been dropped suggests that. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #34

Should Bernie's lawsuit proceed ... NanceGreggs Dec 2015 #65

If Bernie was going to withdraw the lawsuit, I think he would have done it by now 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #74

They have nothing to do with each other. NanceGreggs Dec 2015 #75

Your speculation is duly noted. nt 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #76

I've been a court reporter ... NanceGreggs Dec 2015 #80

Your claims to perfect knowledge about the future are duly noted. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #89

I made no claim to perfect knowledge about the future. NanceGreggs Dec 2015 #90

What a weird (unsupported, and apropos of pretty much nothing) accusation! MADem Dec 2015 #108

People sometimes think ... NanceGreggs Dec 2015 #111

LOL!!!!!!! MADem Dec 2015 #113

This is the 21st Century. You're trying to suggest that Sanders and his people have known who MADem Dec 2015 #29

Your surmisals are just that. 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #30

Again, "Berrrnie" is not an idiot. He can hire an independent auditor to work with MADem Dec 2015 #44

Agreed. Bernie is not an idiot 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #48

For your theory to be correct, you have to either figure that Sanders has the WORST MADem Dec 2015 #50

Based on current evidence, I am currently with you. nt SusanCalvin Dec 2015 #67

Agreed. JunkyardAngel83 Dec 2015 #93

You are pretending that no one knows that DWS and the DNC will do anything to get HRC rhett o rick Dec 2015 #36

Look, when a candidate is losing, and losing badly, unable to grow his constituency, MADem Dec 2015 #37

The behavior of DWS and the DNC is typical of the corruption brought on by the Goldman-Sachs rhett o rick Dec 2015 #38

Let us count the buzzwords. MADem Dec 2015 #46

So you spend time talking down Sanders supporters Furrfu Dec 2015 #54

That's a spurious, lame and false accusation. MADem Dec 2015 #58

So, Silence means OK? kartski Dec 2015 #26

Rationalization is the key to happiness for some. nm rhett o rick Dec 2015 #39

LOL, bernie isn't a victim, and he certainly isn't afraid to speak out.... PosterChild Dec 2015 #82

In this case? Absolutely. MADem Dec 2015 #97

Until Bernie says he agreed to Kroll, we should not assume that he did. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #41

I think until he gripes about them, we should assume he approves of the choice. nt MADem Dec 2015 #99

I haven't heard that he has dropped his lawsuit yet. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #102

His crowds peaked in summer, once people realized it was the same speech at every stop. MADem Dec 2015 #110

His crowds in Iowa are many times the size of Hillary's. Bernie is focusing on Iowa and JDPriestly Dec 2015 #112

Unlike other candidates, bvar22 Dec 2015 #42

The week passed BEFORE any "holiday." MADem Dec 2015 #98

re: "If he had any objections, surely he would have voiced them by now. " thesquanderer Dec 2015 #95

If he had any objections, and wanted to do something about them, surely he would MADem Dec 2015 #96

I suspect it's a trap for Hill. grasswire Dec 2015 #20

"evidence in hand" BOOM!!!! aspirant Dec 2015 #23

I suspect that is what the staffer who got fired was doing jwirr Dec 2015 #94

yes, he made no effort to conceal tracks grasswire Dec 2015 #104

That is what I was thinking... Kalidurga Dec 2015 #31

but hillarians all seem to agree -- only tinfoil-wearing conspiracy theorists dare question stupidicus Dec 2015 #27

Yes, that seems to be the Hllaryians' lie-of-the-day 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #40

indeed, some alarming stuff it is stupidicus Dec 2015 #49

Would there be an auditor suggested by Sanders? Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #32

A court of law maybe???? JDPriestly Dec 2015 #45

That might just happen, a criminal investigation could follow. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #47

Not knowing all the details, I think it is more a contract dispute. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #55

Try these Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #59

Bernie's team did not illegally access the information. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #63

and when the firewall was down-Sanders little elfs went snooping riversedge Dec 2015 #101

If you found your neighbor's stuff on the floors and in the drawers at your house, JDPriestly Dec 2015 #114

oh snap grasswire Dec 2015 #52

The FBI would be acceptable to me Renew Deal Dec 2015 #83

This is not a criminal case. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #86

5 other firms have already been named as more "independent" choices for auditor 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #56

One of those on the "more appropriate" list gave Clinton a 325k speaking fee... Agschmid Dec 2015 #62

Yes, let's scratch that one. It wasn't my list, I borrowed it. Thanks for good catch 99th_Monkey Dec 2015 #66

A very cursory look at those agencies reveals some problems. MADem Dec 2015 #72

Me either. Agschmid Dec 2015 #77

Named by who? Random people on the Internet? Renew Deal Dec 2015 #84

People who don't realize one of those crews gave a quarter million to the RNC... ~! nt MADem Dec 2015 #109

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Dec 2015 #51

K&R Paka Dec 2015 #57

HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Dec 2015 #73

The ONLY legitimate alternative this bullshit so called objective audit.... PosterChild Dec 2015 #79

Is there any evidence that the auditor is questionable? Renew Deal Dec 2015 #81

absolutely grasswire Dec 2015 #85

Perhaps it was Karl n/t Oilwellian Dec 2015 #87

No, there isn't. Which is probably why Sanders didn't complain. MADem Dec 2015 #100

so you are fine with the DNC doing this important investigation.... grasswire Dec 2015 #103

They're not "doing this important investigation." They hired a firm with enormous international MADem Dec 2015 #107

Kick NT pablo_marmol Dec 2015 #88