Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: We literally can't afford Hillary... [View all]Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)32. I'm not poking fun either.
I don't know enough about this person to make any sort of judgment call.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How much salary do you think Hillary will be receiving over what Sanders would be receiving?
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#1
Hillary is not expecting to make as much money as president and therefore is willing to
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#10
It is the levers of power Hillary would have access to as president, not the twice monthly paycheck.
-none
Dec 2015
#13
That's a cute narrative, but nobody runs for president for the salary -- not Bernie either.
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#16
Who is responsible for Sanders not having the same relationship, after all he has been
Thinkingabout
Dec 2015
#17
He himself is responsible for not having the same relationship, and proud of it
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#21
I hope so too. Standard fare for Hillary supporters and this one in particular.
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#28
I have interacted before. I always got the impression I was being trolled. n/t
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#33
Unfortunately, it is not the case that this person in purposely missing the point.
pangaia
Dec 2015
#82
It is ok, this one is going into my little file of bizarre interactions w/ Hillarians. n/t
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#100
Anyone Who Suggests Such A Thing Is Clearly Blind To The Facts... Especially
CorporatistNation
Dec 2015
#23
I think she is expecting to make a lot of money. Goldman-Sachs is very generous. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#46
What a sad commentary on the state of politics today... Hillary should be ashamed.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Dec 2015
#80
Not worried about changes to your social security are you? Some above the 90% may not need it.
DhhD
Dec 2015
#19
This is not one of their better tactics but they are willing to use them all. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#47
This is hilarious. There is ZERO chance this is a true story. Sorry, don't believe you.
stillwaiting
Dec 2015
#44
They knew they had access to something they were not to have access, they took the material. Theft.
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#89
They did searches to ascertain what material they were capable of accessing.
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#104
When some takes something that does not belong to them and arent allowed it is theft. Not hard.
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#116
Define "something that does not belong to them and aren't allowed" in the context of
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#119
And to what site do you think that the Sanders campaign saved the Hillary campaign data?
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#103
I hope he is here (as well as *there*), posting without the TWM just to screw with us.
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#101
Aside from the fact that 85% of donations go to "overhead" which means PAY DAY..
bvar22
Dec 2015
#77
But of course. When Newt Gingrich wrote a book, Rupert Murdock was willing to
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#72
Senator Sanders "An Unblemished FIFTY YEAR RECORD Of Working On Behalf of Average Folks"
CorporatistNation
Dec 2015
#27
And her "just stop it" to the banks really caused them to take notice. (sarcasm) The
Duval
Dec 2015
#40
Sander didnt have a grown up job until 40's. I'm sure all us po schmucks were allowed that prilivege
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#66
Charge the corporation, Speak to the people for free. That works, as a non corporatist, right?
seabeyond
Dec 2015
#63
Once again, it is clear that to some, Democrats should wear sackcloth and ashes...
Hekate
Dec 2015
#64
If she wins, how much will the State of the Union speech cost the tax payers?
LiberalArkie
Dec 2015
#122