Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary would START minimum wage negotiations BELOW a "living wage". [View all]Zynx
(21,328 posts)8. They believe that Sanders will lead such a voter turnout wave that they will take Congress, too.
Of course, that's absolutely preposterous. There's almost no evidence to suggest the nonvoters are strictly closet Democrats.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep, at the same time she claims she wants to "be the champion" of the living wage movement.
Scuba
Dec 2015
#2
and its a huge blind spot for her supporters. this woman has never been poor.
roguevalley
Dec 2015
#5
Her "care" for the poor is like Marie antoinette's. She is willing to let us eat cake.
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#7
Her public position is for a 65% increase in the Minimum Wage and she's a monster?
Zynx
Dec 2015
#15
They believe that Sanders will lead such a voter turnout wave that they will take Congress, too.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#8
If you give up on any policy that won't be approved by Republican congress...
thesquanderer
Dec 2015
#52
If she only campaigns for $12 per hour, then $12 per hour is her starting wage in negotiations.
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#70
In terms adjusted for cost of living $12/hr is pretty much the highest in the entire world.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#11
What I said is actually true. Adjusted for cost of living, no major country is above $12.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#16
...What? That's not even a rational argument. The European countries and Australia
Zynx
Dec 2015
#24
Yes, and that can be handled separately. You don't do that through the minimum wage.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#22
It just means our min wage needs to be higher so people can afford health care
peacebird
Dec 2015
#27
Doesn't it make more sense to have those programs instead of having every single employer
Zynx
Dec 2015
#49
Which policy is easier to pursue? Higher social benefits or a massively higher minimum wage?
Zynx
Dec 2015
#74
I think you would find that we support a very similar level of a guaranteed living for people.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#78
You read wrong. $12 would be the highest minimum wage in history adjusted for inflation.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#110
I think you somehow ignored the fact that I called for radically redistributive policies.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#80
Well, you know the old "set expectations low" so you can go higher. Backwards, IMO
libdem4life
Dec 2015
#89
I actually had a serious argument and you just dismissed it. I would like to say I'm surprised.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#73
Here come the hand it to the "locals", aka State's Rights. Voting Rights, too?
libdem4life
Dec 2015
#65
There is a moral difference between variances in the cost of living and basic human rights.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#71
I don't the "moral difference". Ever bought a tank of propane? There are all of two
libdem4life
Dec 2015
#85
Where do you get that from? While I'm waiting, here is Sanders' position on the minimum wage....
George II
Dec 2015
#12
Not "start negotiations" with Rethuglicans -- "start increases to get to $15". Clever deflection
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#31
I'd like to see the US minimum wage linked to the cost of health care. Since we can't seem to ...
BlueJazz
Dec 2015
#21
Can we expect her to evolve in the negotiations, settle for $6.35 and proclaim it a victory?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2015
#26
I think her plan is minimum of $12 in podunk America, more in high cost areas. Whatever it is, she
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#33
Read the title and you will know what "something" is. Sorry I didn't spell it out for ypu.
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#46
Fine, get nothing. Sanders won't get $12 or even $9 in rural areas. But he can claim he tried.
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#56
Look at what time Sanders has accomplished. Now look at Clinton. If nothing else, Clinton can
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#123
She'll get the job done. I've supported one George McGovern in my life. Not wasting a vote on anoth
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#125
winning at any cost? doesn't matter how one plays the game? am I understanding you correctly?
Hiraeth
Dec 2015
#126
Saving this comment in case Hillary gets elected...sheesh what a depressing prospect.
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#117
Of Course she would - it helps Wall Street. And the rest of us should be grateful
Ferd Berfel
Dec 2015
#72
The last thing we need is another, start in the middle, and settle for less, negotiator. nt
Snotcicles
Dec 2015
#83
...AND THAT is BEFORE the inevitable 3rd Way Triangulation and "compromise" with The Republicans.
bvar22
Dec 2015
#96
Better chance to get $12 passed with a Repub Congress. $30 would be nice too but would never pass.
Lil Missy
Dec 2015
#112