Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary would START minimum wage negotiations BELOW a "living wage". [View all]Zynx
(21,328 posts)15. Her public position is for a 65% increase in the Minimum Wage and she's a monster?
Oh, okay.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yep, at the same time she claims she wants to "be the champion" of the living wage movement.
Scuba
Dec 2015
#2
and its a huge blind spot for her supporters. this woman has never been poor.
roguevalley
Dec 2015
#5
Her "care" for the poor is like Marie antoinette's. She is willing to let us eat cake.
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#7
Her public position is for a 65% increase in the Minimum Wage and she's a monster?
Zynx
Dec 2015
#15
They believe that Sanders will lead such a voter turnout wave that they will take Congress, too.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#8
If you give up on any policy that won't be approved by Republican congress...
thesquanderer
Dec 2015
#52
If she only campaigns for $12 per hour, then $12 per hour is her starting wage in negotiations.
JDPriestly
Dec 2015
#70
In terms adjusted for cost of living $12/hr is pretty much the highest in the entire world.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#11
What I said is actually true. Adjusted for cost of living, no major country is above $12.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#16
...What? That's not even a rational argument. The European countries and Australia
Zynx
Dec 2015
#24
Yes, and that can be handled separately. You don't do that through the minimum wage.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#22
It just means our min wage needs to be higher so people can afford health care
peacebird
Dec 2015
#27
Doesn't it make more sense to have those programs instead of having every single employer
Zynx
Dec 2015
#49
Which policy is easier to pursue? Higher social benefits or a massively higher minimum wage?
Zynx
Dec 2015
#74
I think you would find that we support a very similar level of a guaranteed living for people.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#78
You read wrong. $12 would be the highest minimum wage in history adjusted for inflation.
DanTex
Dec 2015
#110
I think you somehow ignored the fact that I called for radically redistributive policies.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#80
Well, you know the old "set expectations low" so you can go higher. Backwards, IMO
libdem4life
Dec 2015
#89
I actually had a serious argument and you just dismissed it. I would like to say I'm surprised.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#73
Here come the hand it to the "locals", aka State's Rights. Voting Rights, too?
libdem4life
Dec 2015
#65
There is a moral difference between variances in the cost of living and basic human rights.
Zynx
Dec 2015
#71
I don't the "moral difference". Ever bought a tank of propane? There are all of two
libdem4life
Dec 2015
#85
Where do you get that from? While I'm waiting, here is Sanders' position on the minimum wage....
George II
Dec 2015
#12
Not "start negotiations" with Rethuglicans -- "start increases to get to $15". Clever deflection
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#31
I'd like to see the US minimum wage linked to the cost of health care. Since we can't seem to ...
BlueJazz
Dec 2015
#21
Can we expect her to evolve in the negotiations, settle for $6.35 and proclaim it a victory?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2015
#26
I think her plan is minimum of $12 in podunk America, more in high cost areas. Whatever it is, she
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#33
Read the title and you will know what "something" is. Sorry I didn't spell it out for ypu.
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#46
Fine, get nothing. Sanders won't get $12 or even $9 in rural areas. But he can claim he tried.
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#56
Look at what time Sanders has accomplished. Now look at Clinton. If nothing else, Clinton can
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#123
She'll get the job done. I've supported one George McGovern in my life. Not wasting a vote on anoth
Hoyt
Dec 2015
#125
winning at any cost? doesn't matter how one plays the game? am I understanding you correctly?
Hiraeth
Dec 2015
#126
Saving this comment in case Hillary gets elected...sheesh what a depressing prospect.
JonLeibowitz
Dec 2015
#117
Of Course she would - it helps Wall Street. And the rest of us should be grateful
Ferd Berfel
Dec 2015
#72
The last thing we need is another, start in the middle, and settle for less, negotiator. nt
Snotcicles
Dec 2015
#83
...AND THAT is BEFORE the inevitable 3rd Way Triangulation and "compromise" with The Republicans.
bvar22
Dec 2015
#96
Better chance to get $12 passed with a Repub Congress. $30 would be nice too but would never pass.
Lil Missy
Dec 2015
#112