Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton’s insane plan for a no-fly zone [View all]AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)9. So WWIII is on the table?
Cuz TERROR!!!1! Move over Christy, you got company!
She is trying to appeal to Republicans by taking right wing fringe positions on certain issues, like war. Sanders appeals to a subset of disillusioned Republicans tired of making $7 per hour.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She is just chomping at the bit to get a chance to play with her soldiers......
bowens43
Dec 2015
#1
A good read for people who don't understand why Hillary's support of a NFZ is disturbing.
beam me up scottie
Dec 2015
#4
WHY Hillary's Casual Assertion of Advocating A No FLY Zone Has Not Received the ATTENTION...
CorporatistNation
Dec 2015
#31
I don't get the idea of a no fly zone to take out ISIS since they don't have planes.
Vinca
Dec 2015
#6
I suspect the American public has less stomach for more war than the media would like us to believe.
Scuba
Dec 2015
#11
I hope this post gets hundreds of replies. I can't imagine something that would be more
Vattel
Dec 2015
#14
She says, "I do not think it would come to that", regarding shooting down Russian planes.
TwilightGardener
Dec 2015
#15
This right here is why I don't know if I will be able to figure out a way to actually vote for her
Purveyor
Dec 2015
#26
That would certainly qualify as another major war. It would likely be our last.
leveymg
Dec 2015
#36
This is nuts, and the media is protecting her on foreign policy. This is a bad idea.
ViseGrip
Dec 2015
#29
Option 3: Money talks. She's promoting the best interests of her stockholders.
sorechasm
Dec 2015
#40
If they were to honestly acknowledge this, they'd probably have to stop supporting her
jfern
Dec 2015
#42