Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why Hillary Clinton Won’t Prevent the Next Economic Recession [View all]nc4bo
(17,651 posts)13. To his credit, MO'M has some policies on his website that addresses some of these concerns.
Elevate Focus on Economic Crimes at the Department of Justice
After the financial meltdown, the DOJ fell down on the job of prosecuting financial institutions for breaking the law. Rather than focusing on more time-consuming investigations and criminal prosecutions, they resorted to a fines-only approach of cracking down on law-breaking.
To date, not one single Wall Street CEO has faced criminal prosecution. Compare this stat to the aftermath of the 1980s savings-and-loan scandal when hundreds of individuals were criminally prosecuted. Changing the culture at the DOJ will start at the top, but it should also be given the resources to investigate and prosecute financial crimes in-house.
Governor OMalley will:
Create a Standalone Economic Crimes Division Within DOJ. To increase the focus on investigating and prosecuting financial crimes, Governor OMalley will create a Division of Economic Crimes within DOJ that is separate and co-equal to the criminal division. The economic crimes unit should have an independent budget and be staffed with top prosecutors and FBI agents.
PROPOSAL: ENFORCE REAL PENALTIES FOR FINANCIAL CRIMES
Since the financial crash, the federal governments key enforcement agencies have sent a message to the largest financial institutions that they are too big to jail and somehow above the laws that apply to every other entity and individual in America.
Rather than enforcing penalties that would have real deterrent effects, enforcement agencies have relied almost exclusively on settlements as a punitive measure. As a result, banks like JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Barclays, UBS, and the Royal Bank of Scotland have continued to break the law, because they know that they will face nothing more than a slap on the wrista fine paid with shareholder money that can often be deducted from their taxes as a business expense.
Require Law-Breaking Banks and their Executives to Admit Guilt, Face Real Consequences
While the DOJ and SEC have touted the large fines theyve imposed on law-breaking financial institutions, they have failed to implement any policies that will serve as real deterrents against continued law-breaking.
After the financial meltdown, the DOJ fell down on the job of prosecuting financial institutions for breaking the law. Rather than focusing on more time-consuming investigations and criminal prosecutions, they resorted to a fines-only approach of cracking down on law-breaking.
To date, not one single Wall Street CEO has faced criminal prosecution. Compare this stat to the aftermath of the 1980s savings-and-loan scandal when hundreds of individuals were criminally prosecuted. Changing the culture at the DOJ will start at the top, but it should also be given the resources to investigate and prosecute financial crimes in-house.
Governor OMalley will:
Create a Standalone Economic Crimes Division Within DOJ. To increase the focus on investigating and prosecuting financial crimes, Governor OMalley will create a Division of Economic Crimes within DOJ that is separate and co-equal to the criminal division. The economic crimes unit should have an independent budget and be staffed with top prosecutors and FBI agents.
PROPOSAL: ENFORCE REAL PENALTIES FOR FINANCIAL CRIMES
Since the financial crash, the federal governments key enforcement agencies have sent a message to the largest financial institutions that they are too big to jail and somehow above the laws that apply to every other entity and individual in America.
Rather than enforcing penalties that would have real deterrent effects, enforcement agencies have relied almost exclusively on settlements as a punitive measure. As a result, banks like JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Barclays, UBS, and the Royal Bank of Scotland have continued to break the law, because they know that they will face nothing more than a slap on the wrista fine paid with shareholder money that can often be deducted from their taxes as a business expense.
Require Law-Breaking Banks and their Executives to Admit Guilt, Face Real Consequences
While the DOJ and SEC have touted the large fines theyve imposed on law-breaking financial institutions, they have failed to implement any policies that will serve as real deterrents against continued law-breaking.
Sen. Sanders hasn't filled out his plan (I wish he would though). Sanders has always spoken up against Wallstreet and I do trust him to protect us from their greed....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
19 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary HAS to say she is against Glass Steagall. Her hubby got rid of it, and to support is admits
ViseGrip
Dec 2015
#1
the DLC wasn't just there to boost the Dixiecrats and the Reagan Dems who wanted boots on the
MisterP
Dec 2015
#2
Glass-Steagall is important to the individual depositor because it protects our money.
jwirr
Dec 2015
#8