Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]Armstead
(47,803 posts)49. My point is...
that Clinton and others are basically saying that the affluent (not super rich but well off) would be punished if there were a tax increase on upper incomes that might affect them too. Which is a variation of the GOP mantra.
Nobody likes taxes. But if we are to live in a society with a safety net, public services, national defense and other public benefits and protections, then w all have to pony up to some extent. The possibility of offering improved services in exchange for small increases for some upper middle class shouldn't be used as a way to discourage progress.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
None of the Democratic candidates have proposed what this OP said. So I have no idea who the OP is
still_one
Jan 2016
#1
we had a majority. Not sure what is being referred to, but just venturing out slightly to 2008,
still_one
Jan 2016
#17
Single payer didn't get on the table because the blue dogs had already said the wouldn't vote for it
still_one
Jan 2016
#20
It was put on the table as a compromise...it didn't happen but it was on the table. nt
haikugal
Jan 2016
#23
Single Payer-You still float the idea and give the American people a chance to hear about it.
jalan48
Jan 2016
#43
Excuse me. The republicans did NOT vote for 99% of the Democratic legislation, so your asertion
still_one
Jan 2016
#28
You're right a President can't do any of those things on their own. But...
A Simple Game
Jan 2016
#21
$250k / hr is fine for her and Bill. $600k / year is fine for Chelsea. $15 / hr is too much for us.
Skeeter Barnes
Jan 2016
#2
Wait... I can have a White Elephant instead of a pony? No wonder I support Bernie! n/t
A Simple Game
Jan 2016
#24
Shhh ... 250k IS "a lot"; but, no way near membership of the ownership class ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2016
#10
A small hike for the affluent is NOT a radical screwing of them, especially if....
Armstead
Jan 2016
#26
But even less of the population when you take out deductions and write offs.
Hassin Bin Sober
Jan 2016
#14
Plus sending young Americans to their deaths overseas to protect your investments
Motown_Johnny
Jan 2016
#40