Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)What should the federal minimum wage be? [View all]
Last edited Sat Jan 2, 2016, 07:52 PM - Edit history (1)
TL; DR: A $12 per hour minimum wage would already be the highest in U.S. history, even accounting for inflation. It would also be the second highest in the world, behind only the tiny enclave of San Marino, in terms of purchasing power. On the other hand, $15 would be so far beyond what's been tried internationally or at home that it risks significant unwanted consequences.One issue of debate in the Democratic primary is raising the minimum wage. The current federal minimum wage is $7.25 an hour. All three of our candidates propose raising this significantly-- Clinton wants to raise it to $12 an hour, while Sanders and O'Malley propose raising it to $15 an hour.
Now, this sounds like an easy one-- isn't $15 more than $12? So Sanders and O'Malley are better, right? Well, not necessarily.
If it were that simple, people should be arguing for $20, or $50, or $100. But nobody is seriously proposing that. What would go wrong if we made it $100? Most directly, the cost of labor would increase so high that businesses would have to lay off all their employees or greatly raise prices. You wouldn't pay your babysitter $100 an hour-- you'd simply stop going out. Restaurants couldn't pay their staff that much-- either they'd be forced to close, or raise their prices hugely to compensate. Same for virtually everyone else. In the end, all the inflation would undo the effect of the new minimum wage, after a fair amount of upheaval.
So we can't simply raise the minimum wage to $100. But how high can we make it?
First, it's comforting to know that there likely is room to raise the minimum wage without economic disruption, despite what conservatives will tell you. In one very influential paper, economists David Card and Alan Krueger found that when New Jersey raised its minimum wage, job growth at fast food restaurants near the border with Pennsylvania was not at all negatively affected, nor was job growth at low-wage restaurants worse than at higher-wage restaurants within New Jersey.
This same Alan Krueger, by the way, was chair of Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, and is considered one of the nation's foremost experts on labor economics and the minimum wage. What does he think? In a New York Times column, he argues that $12 would be a responsible level than will do more good than harm, but that $15 would venture too far be too risky, as it is "beyond international experience".
Probably due to space limitations, Krueger doesn't elaborate on what that means, but I tried to figure a little bit out on my own. The first question is, what do other countries have as their minimum wages? According to Wikipedia, by purchasing power, the world's highest minimum wage is in San Marino, at a equivalent of $12.55. Second is Luxembourg at $11.43, followed by Australia ($11.14), France ($11.01) , and Germany ($10.43). So $12, far from being miserly, would actually be nearly the highest in the world. And $15 would be so high than we're in the realm of potential serious unexpected consequences, in terms of unemployment or inflation.
Another way we might look at things is to see what the hourly wages are right now across the United States. After all, the cost of living varies widely from state to state, and often within the same state. San Francisco, with its high incomes and high real estate prices, could likely easily increase its minimum wage to $15 (in fact, it will do so by July 2018), but the nearby Central Valley might not. Now, here, I couldn't find a source that listed everything in a nice table, but the Bureau of Labor Statistics has a page where you can look up each state one-by-one.
Here are some states which I thought might have high median hourly wages, and some which I guessed would have lower ones.
New York: $19.65
Maryland: $19.63
California: $18.84
Rhode Island: $18.43
New Mexico: $15.29
Alabama: $14.83
West Virginia: $14.14
Mississippi: $13.76
What we see here is that there are entire states whose median hourly wage is less than $15. So far from being something that helps those at the lower end, a $15 minimum wage would affect more than half the workers in those states. With that kind of impact, and so few relevant real-world examples to study, it's really hard to know what effects unemployment or inflation would have there.
Editorializing for a moment:
Edit: Removed this section. I decided it wasn't helpful.
237 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Actually $21 would be fairer. That's what it would be if adjusted for inflation.
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#12
Seems you can't discuss this rationally and I am not surprised because you've taken
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#46
And my point is that $12 is an insult. It's not a living wage. Why not $15?
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#55
Your arguements don't have anything to do with the morality of providing a living wage.
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#66
Show me a study that says that raising the min wage causes unemployment and inflation.
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#82
You disagree with Senator Warren, then. If twelve bucks is an "insult," you're gonna HATE ten
MADem
Jan 2016
#104
Not sure what your point is there--the other poster was calling two bucks more than that
MADem
Jan 2016
#139
I support a $15 min wage. I guess you support a mere $10.10. Sad when Democrats care more
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#129
Do you at least agree that it is possible to set the minimum wage too high?
BlueCheese
Jan 2016
#131
I have never seen any articles claiming that. Maybe you can link me to one. nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#205
"giving excessive resources to those that don't produce...is a recipe for societal collapse"
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2016
#105
Yeah, and then taxpayers are on the hook providing "additional services" to people who work 40+ hrs
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#18
And this is all preferable to simply telling McDonalds, etc. to pay their workers a living wage?
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#78
Ah, Capital Flight.. Like, McDonalds is going to take all their burger-selling operations to Mexico
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#136
I disagree. Maybe that's true in a world of Republicons or Libertarians, but
rhett o rick
Jan 2016
#52
I gave up, it's not worth disussing anything with someone who advocates survival of the fittest.
beam me up scottie
Jan 2016
#138
The system runs on money-if the damn system makes it impossible to be of monetary worth to those
Stargazer99
Jan 2016
#113
Isn't the logical thing, then, to be pushing for greater benefits and not higher mandated wages?
Zynx
Jan 2016
#153
If people want to bleat on and piss/moan over "if 15 why not 20" then fine, make it 20.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#14
Apparently if they have to pay workers too much, McDonalds will pack up and sell their burgers to us
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#140
And then we'll have to give the hordes of unemployed moochers welfare or they'll riot.
beam me up scottie
Jan 2016
#141
I keep hearing this stuff about how Sanders supporters are all soooper-seekrit libertarians
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2016
#27
I'm more interested in a minimum living wage, so something like this...
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Jan 2016
#28
because mississippi and the rest of the fuckwad bullshit rightwing hellholes would have no min.
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2016
#148
Adjusted for purchasing power, because Australia has a higher cost of living, it's around $11.14.
Zynx
Jan 2016
#160
I think we've all seen the graph of stagnant wage compared to relative corporate growth...
MrMickeysMom
Jan 2016
#62
ideally, it should be staggered according to cost of living in different
Douglas Carpenter
Jan 2016
#91
I think we should go for $15, since by the time we actually get the chance to do this
Starry Messenger
Jan 2016
#122
In 1972 this was actually supported by both President Nixon and by Senator
Douglas Carpenter
Jan 2016
#135
$22 an hour? Every single job has to be paid essentially at least $45,000 a year?
Zynx
Jan 2016
#156
Exactly. The guaranteed minimum income has always been proposed as a barebones safety net.
Zynx
Jan 2016
#176
If you're willing to settle for $12, you should start the negotiation at $15 or higher.
Scuba
Jan 2016
#142
So all increases to productivity should go to sit-on-their-ass-and-do-nothing upper management?
99Forever
Jan 2016
#159
No, but the basic point is that you can't provide a uniform adjustment based on productivity.
Zynx
Jan 2016
#161
I'm not. I do work in public policy analysis and I'm concerned about overly simplistic policies.
Zynx
Jan 2016
#181
Wait...what? If an industry goes under because its products aren't desired anymore, that's one thing
Zynx
Jan 2016
#189
Personally insulting people who want the same end goal as you but disagree slightly on means...
Zynx
Jan 2016
#199
You've got me. I'm part of a vast conspiracy to oppress the working and middle class.
Zynx
Jan 2016
#226
This is essentially conservative propaganda and I wish I weren't seeing it on DU. nt
Todays_Illusion
Jan 2016
#171
Respectfully, raising the minimum wage to the highest in the world is not conservative propaganda.
BlueCheese
Jan 2016
#173
Increasing it to the vicinity of $12 is deemed unacceptable. That's a 65.5% increase.
Zynx
Jan 2016
#229
Yes, and that didn't happen. She was asking for a nominal increase and couldn't get that.
EndElectoral
Jan 2016
#197