2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: This idea thst Bernie gets elected and all of the venal and craven aspects go away [View all]LWolf
(46,179 posts)That would be foolish indeed. I, though, as a Sanders supporter, have had plenty of opportunity to observe what you claim, and I haven't.
You threw out an accusation without evidence. Which makes that accusation, at best, an effort to lob shit to see if it would stick, and at worst, dishonest.
"Listen?" How ironic. If you'd listened at all to Bernie Sanders, you'd know that he says it over and over and over and over, every time he speaks to people. He can't do it alone; no one can, and if he wins, the fight is just beginning. That's what he's saying, that's what his supporters hear and know, and trying to suggest otherwise suggests, to say it kindly, ignorance.
You are not under "seize" at DU. Nobody is seizing you. I think you might be trying to suggest that you are under "siege."
You are posting in GDP. I don't know if you have a candidate of choice. This is the first of your posts I've ever read. If you are supporting MOM or HRC, that's fine. BUT...if you are going to jump into the GDP arena, you have to be able to handle opposition. That's not a "siege." If you don't want a response, don't attack.
What, exactly, doesn't "serve" me? Calling bullshit when I see it? I'm not the one who started a bullshit OP without evidence. I'm not speaking for anyone but myself.
I don't see rebutting someone's bullshit accusation as a "mistake." And I'd love to see what other "mistakes" you are accusing me of making.