Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
32. You mean like Hillary also favoured state's rights with regards to gun control?:
Tue Jan 5, 2016, 06:17 PM
Jan 2016
Let states & cities determine local gun laws

Q: Do you support the DC handgun ban?

A: I want to give local communities the authority over determining how to keep their citizens safe. This case you’re referring to is before the Supreme Court.

Q: But what do you support?

A: I support sensible regulation that is consistent with the constitutional right to own and bear arms.

Q: Is the DC ban consistent with that right?

A: I think a total ban, with no exceptions under any circumstances, might be found by the court not to be. But DC or anybody else [should be able to] come up with sensible regulations to protect their people.

Q: But do you still favor licensing and registration of handguns?

A: What I favor is what works in NY. We have one set of rules in NYC and a totally different set of rules in the rest of the state. What might work in NYC is certainly not going to work in Montana. So, for the federal government to be having any kind of blanket rules that they’re going to try to impose, I think doesn’t make sense.

Source: 2008 Philadelphia primary debate, on eve of PA primary , Apr 16, 2008

http://www.ontheissues.org/2016/Hillary_Clinton_Gun_Control.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hmmm. In my opinion, that's not likely. NurseJackie Jan 2016 #1
And why would he not? nc4bo Jan 2016 #2
He has said that guns are important to rural voters, and he has a mixed record. pnwmom Jan 2016 #4
Mixed record means different things to different people. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #27
He voted against the Brady bill and for the bill that repealed pnwmom Jan 2016 #30
a 2 second news google search indicates that all three have already supported him restorefreedom Jan 2016 #3
Indeed. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #6
well done! always good to diversify the sci fi characters. restorefreedom Jan 2016 #13
Speaking of sci-fi, I like to pretend ops like this are episodes of MST3K. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #18
eggggggscellent...that could help restorefreedom Jan 2016 #24
In that case, I have a question of THE UTMOST importance: DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #49
Well duh. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #51
Wrong answer, Newt Hitler. I like Mike! DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #54
Nooooooooooooooo! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #58
That's not what I asked. I asked if the candidates will urge voters pnwmom Jan 2016 #7
not going there restorefreedom Jan 2016 #20
That STILL isn't what Pwnmom asked ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #42
as i said further downthread restorefreedom Jan 2016 #45
There are plenty of Democrats that are pro-gun ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #62
in a d vs r race, the choice would appear to be obvious restorefreedom Jan 2016 #65
Not for those pledging to NOT vote, should the candidate of their choice not get the nomination. n/ 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #66
i honestly have not seen one post vowing to not vote restorefreedom Jan 2016 #68
Okay ... I doubt the veracity of your statement, as there have been far too many ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #70
individual people saying they won't vote? restorefreedom Jan 2016 #72
You mean like Hillary also favoured state's rights with regards to gun control?: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #32
Oopsie! CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #44
Those pesky facts again! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #53
They never learn. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #60
that was from her annie oakley period questionseverything Jan 2016 #76
Yep, back when she mocked Obama for his gun control stance. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #96
I find it cowardly? pangaia Jan 2016 #36
that too. nt restorefreedom Jan 2016 #48
I wonder how many Clinton supporters will continue to ignore jeff47 Jan 2016 #5
No shit. This OP had me scratching my head. It's like they ignore current reality and rewrite it Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #8
Bernie announced his support of Obama taking executive actions -- a different thing. pnwmom Jan 2016 #17
He didn't announce support for the idea of urging voters not to vote for pro-gun candidates. pnwmom Jan 2016 #10
Keep me meme alive!!!!!!! (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #14
!!! nc4bo Jan 2016 #19
Bwahahahah! CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #33
LOL! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #21
are you actually implying Hillary will not support pro-gun Democrats from Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #93
Perhaps you should consider what congress would look like if ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #43
Or, maybe Jeff47 has a modicum of intelligence and could plainly see that the OP is an attack. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #50
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #59
You really need to get your story straight. jeff47 Jan 2016 #75
My "story" is straight ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #80
K, I'll happily bring this up the next time you complain about people not backing jeff47 Jan 2016 #82
Please do! I have never complianed about "impure" candidates ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #84
One of the biggest problems in terms of guns. PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 #9
I think all three candidates agree with the Pres on this. n/t MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #11
yea! logic and reason still exist! restorefreedom Jan 2016 #22
When has Bernie ever urged voters not to vote for pro-gun candidates? pnwmom Jan 2016 #25
When has Hillary? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #41
shhhhhh...don't bring up logical and factual counter arguments....l restorefreedom Jan 2016 #46
And what the hell is a "pro-gun" candidate? Is Hillary "anti-gun"? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #52
only at this exact moment in time, for the purposes of this thread.. restorefreedom Jan 2016 #63
No way is Annie Oakley opposed to the 2nd amendment. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #64
i thought that was caribou barbie... restorefreedom Jan 2016 #67
Only one candidate is pro-death penalty as well. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #69
yeah, the dp thing really bothers me restorefreedom Jan 2016 #71
Bernie was the first to come out in support. But you already knew that. nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #12
rejecting pro-gun candidates? dlwickham Jan 2016 #16
He said he'd support executive action. He didn't say he'd urge voters pnwmom Jan 2016 #23
since most progun candidates are rabid republicans, restorefreedom Jan 2016 #26
Not all. Bernie voted against the Brady bill, pnwmom Jan 2016 #28
That's a whole lot of half-truths packed into one post. jeff47 Jan 2016 #37
The liability laws applied to gun SELLERS, too, and they were overturned pnwmom Jan 2016 #56
And yet again you're wrong. jeff47 Jan 2016 #73
The gun dealer who sold the gun to James Holmes couldn't be sued for damages pnwmom Jan 2016 #77
And you're wrong yet again. jeff47 Jan 2016 #81
This does nothing to disprove what I said about the James Holmes case -- thanks to the pnwmom Jan 2016 #83
Yes, actually it does. jeff47 Jan 2016 #87
It was impossible for the parents of the victims of James Holmes, and everyone pnwmom Jan 2016 #88
No, it was quite possible - they did it. jeff47 Jan 2016 #89
Don't you even read your own links? pnwmom Jan 2016 #90
Apparently, you don't actually read the links. jeff47 Jan 2016 #91
It was DISMISSED. If there was a trial, I can't find it. All I can find is that it was dismissed, pnwmom Jan 2016 #92
It was dismissed for failing to show any negligence. jeff47 Jan 2016 #104
Outstanding research, jeff! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #94
Not really research. It's just actually paying attention to the issue jeff47 Jan 2016 #105
facts just do not matter for some Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #85
That is completely false. Vattel Jan 2016 #97
Still completely false. Vattel Jan 2016 #98
Link please. I provided some and you haven't. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #99
It is all in the judge's order of dismissal. Vattel Jan 2016 #100
Thank you for the document. You failed to read it. Please see pages 6 - 10, pnwmom Jan 2016 #101
I am trying to inform you of the facts here. You should be less careless Vattel Jan 2016 #102
And he spent 5 pages going over the PLCAA because it, all by itself, pnwmom Jan 2016 #103
Not quite. PLCAA all by itself could not have formed the basis for the dismissal Vattel Jan 2016 #106
yes, yes. pangaia Jan 2016 #40
he just said he will continue what obama does restorefreedom Jan 2016 #47
I get your nuance on this, so I think the question is fair. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #29
I agree. pnwmom Jan 2016 #31
Hillary and Obama also noted the difference between rural and urban gun use: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #34
I don't know about you, but to me it almost seems like Hillary and Bernie Vattel Jan 2016 #79
They're not. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #95
FAIL! fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #15
Why don't you just come out and say what you REALLY mean? pangaia Jan 2016 #35
Could you provide links to Clinton and O'Malley saying they will urge voters jeff47 Jan 2016 #38
It would be consistent with their past gun positions and inconsistent with Bernie's. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #57
So no, you don't actually have any quotes, you just wanted to bash Sanders again. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #74
so no quotes Duckhunter935 Jan 2016 #86
It's a good and fair question. lovemydog Jan 2016 #39
Obama doesn't want to take guns away from rural voters. So I see no conflict. Vattel Jan 2016 #55
Where does Annie stand on this? Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #61
Annie says it's a hard knock life. lovemydog Jan 2016 #78
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I wonder if all three can...»Reply #32