Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders couldn't name one CEO that he would have sent to jail after the economic collapse [View all]Response to TM99 (Reply #3)
KittyWampus This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sanders couldn't name one CEO that he would have sent to jail after the economic collapse [View all]
ProudToBeLiberal
Jan 2016
OP
Why wouldn't he? Isn't one of his attributes the willingness to speak truth to power, regardless
Empowerer
Jan 2016
#33
That same logic could be applied to the bankers you laud Sanders for going after
mythology
Jan 2016
#124
It's the plain common-sense way to have things like this done. Bernie strikes me as having
Cal33
Jan 2016
#134
He can have it any way he wants. It is called having an opinion. I respect him for it...
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#24
Reread my reply. Bernie knows more than he is telling. Your opinion about illogical claims rings true regarding Hillary, though...
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#146
President Sanders will do that after a thorough and independent investigation by his Justice Dep't.
Green Forest
Jan 2016
#149
I take the increased number of attacks on Bernie as a sign the Hillary camp is worried.
reformist2
Jan 2016
#27
Who are people he says committed 'illegal behavior" from his speech today??...
riversedge
Jan 2016
#70
What about when Holder, the fucking attorney general, said that some institutions were too important
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#19
I don't know, I'm not a criminal prosecutor. That is not where my training lies.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#22
There isa a huige difference between criminal prosecution of a corporation and the criminal ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2016
#32
I completely agree, the ratings angencies were probably most responsible for what happened.
MeNMyVolt
Jan 2016
#57
He actually did name Jamie Dimon, but didnt specifically say he should be in jail, even tho we all
litlbilly
Jan 2016
#42
the fact is, they never even get prosecuted at all, so they completely get away with it. Unless,
litlbilly
Jan 2016
#60
I supported Howard Dean in 2004. You can check out my post history from 2003 on DU. Nt
ProudToBeLiberal
Jan 2016
#48
Sorry. Doesn't prove you are liberal. You can be for Hillary without constantly tearing down Bernie
HERVEPA
Jan 2016
#108
I asked for proof you were liberal. Never asked for Howard Dean proof. You misinterpreted my comment
HERVEPA
Jan 2016
#111
He saiut??d there was 'Illegal behavior" and no one went to jail. Who is he talking abo
riversedge
Jan 2016
#74
The writer of this article is a right wing nut You should have just gone to Faux News and
INdemo
Jan 2016
#93
You know as Hillary supporters what you should have done and kept everything at a civil level
INdemo
Jan 2016
#119
I know, right? He also doesn't take their dirty fucking MONEY... unlike Hillary.
AzDar
Jan 2016
#110
Ask him to commit SLANDER. Fucking brilliant, even from a Hillary supporter.
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2016
#122
There were no investigations. Naming names could be considered defamation .
Motown_Johnny
Jan 2016
#125
The President isn't supposed to influence the DOJ by naming people he wants in jail
Babel_17
Jan 2016
#131