Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Tom Rinaldo

(23,191 posts)
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:17 AM Jan 2016

There is No National Leader Other than Sanders Ready to Directly Confront the Uber Rich's Power [View all]

It really boils down to that. Greed is this nation's cardinal sin; the lust for power and possessions, the addiction to conspicuous consumption, the hoarding of precious resources for the egotistical pride of ownership. Greed has become so ubiquitous that it is no longer recognized as unethical, let alone immoral, to embrace it. Most of the super rich believe that they deserve everything that they have, that they have in some way earned it all. And that they are fully entitled to acquire even more regardless of how much human suffering caused by basic deprivation multiplies around them. The standard by which their actions are now judged isn't ethics, it isn't morality, the standard is legislatively defined legality, and even that standard is applied loosely. Loopholes in the law are rarely simple errors, they are almost always intentional evasions of the professed intent of the actual law, ordered by and paid for by those who profit from evading it, made legal through the magic of campaign donations and the boutique hand crafted statures that the uber rich hire lobbyists and lawyers to write for them.

Working people can no longer afford to pay the tab for the limitless sense of entitlement that the ultra wealthy in America are infected with. When we say enough is enough they fundamentally can't grasp that cry because the word "enough" literally has no meaning to them. There is no such thing as enough in their world view, more is always better when it comes to them. And it all seems so very normal to our elites: the way divine rights once seemed normal to royalty, the way slavery once seemed normal to slave owners, and child labor once seemed normal to mill owners.

No doubt many, but by no means all, of the super wealthy work hard in pursuit of their extravagances. No doubt many, but by no means all, of the super wealthy are subject to significant stress in pursuit of their fortunes. But most of the poor work hard in pursuit of basic survival, and are subject to significant stress in a desperate struggle to keep food on their tables and a roof over their heads. What high powered CEO working 60 hour work weeks in the throes of fierce competition faces more stress than a parent who can't assure their child of food or a place to live? And when the wealthy get ill, when life itself lies in the balance, though there may or may not be a cure for what ails them means always exist to pursue any shred of hope in finding one. With the poor though, even when an established treatment holds promise for a cure the means to avail themselves of it frequently is denied. Greed fundamentally dictates the variables in the equation of life and death. It is that simple and that profound.

The last refuge of those who defend the sense of extreme entitlement that the super wealthy take for granted is the concept of some special talents, some special abilities, that make their unique contributions to society worthy of virtually unlimited levels of compensation, even in times of wide spread economic scarcity. How much is the ability to accurately forecast a market trend worth in a year: One hundred thousand, five hundred thousand, five million, five hundred million? Or to repeatedly close complex development deals; ten million, five hundred million, more? How much is a biochemist worth who doggedly pursues a brilliant insight and pioneers a new approach to a cancer treatment? Is it anywhere in the same ball park? Or what about the psychotherapist with the insights and ability to penetrate and sooth a troubled mind before it hardens into that of the next mass murderer? How about those fire fighters who rushed up the second twin tower with their highly disciplined skill set after the first tower had fallen? Are the efforts of one downtown land developer really worth more than the collective contribution of an entire major city fire department?

An oligarchy is blind to questions of basic justice that impedes its sense of privilege. The more powerful it becomes the more power it exerts and the more new power it seeks to accumulate. The difference in the compensation for an average corporate worker and an average CEO continues to grow exponentially while earnings shrink for most Americans, along with the middle class itself. There is nothing about politics as usual that will fundamentally alter this trajectory. This is the status quo of deterioration, the one we have lived with for 40 years - worsening by the decade, that left unchecked ultimately leads to an implosion, an explosion, or both. If and when that occurs it won't really threaten the super wealthy, they have the option of shifting their personal operations to Singapore or wherever else their wealth can buy them all of the perks that they are addicted to. Patriotism in the final analysis means little to a global class of billionaires free to cross most ant border.

Bernie Sanders is alone in the national spotlight right now in speaking unvarnished truth to an increasingly consolidated seat of economic power. Greed is a cancer hollowing out the fiber of our nation and Bernie Sanders has the vision, fortitude, and courage to openly acknowledge and confront it. Our nation needs an attitude adjustment, big time, and not just for the rich; all of us need to examine our consciences. What do we find morally unacceptable, and what will we do politically about it? A day of reckoning is coming, the longer it is put off the more tens of millions will suffer. Explosive change is dangerous and never guarantees a positive outcome. That can be averted, we can still prevail through a peaceful struggle to restore our democracy to one that, in the words of Lincoln,“is of the people, by the people and for the people.” That effort though is far less likely to succeed with leaders who paper over the great economic divide among us, either with platitudes like vows to make America great again or with yet another round of window dressing proposals.

We need a president unafraid to tell it like it really is, in the daily lives of most of our citizens; one willing to take on the full force and fury head on of those who have presided over the virtually complete transformation of our once vibrant democracy into an oligarchy. If not Bernie Sanders now, who then, and when?

78 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fantastic post! tk2kewl Jan 2016 #1
Thank you... Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #2
I wish I could articulate my disgust with such eloquence tk2kewl Jan 2016 #3
Terrible post: more pie in the sky about Sanders lewebley3 Jan 2016 #9
So none of things Tom describes are problems for you? tk2kewl Jan 2016 #10
Sanders not the solution: Sanders doesn't have any political lewebley3 Jan 2016 #14
I will simply note this Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #18
If Sanders had potential: he would not have started at 73 lewebley3 Jan 2016 #19
It's fascinating just how little you care about policy. jeff47 Jan 2016 #22
Policy comes from the members of the party; for ex Senator Boxer lewebley3 Jan 2016 #25
ROFL. jeff47 Jan 2016 #31
He started at 73 because zalinda Jan 2016 #24
What would Sanders know about the job of the Executive Branch lewebley3 Jan 2016 #26
He was mayor of Burlington zalinda Jan 2016 #32
Perhaps you shiouldread about Sanders management skiills as Mayor Armstead Jan 2016 #35
"Sanders doesn't have not management skills"? Ken Burch Jan 2016 #56
pragmatic centrism has gotten us to where we are... tk2kewl Jan 2016 #38
Wrong: The GOP has gotten us where we are and ideologues lewebley3 Jan 2016 #40
you're entitled to your opinion tk2kewl Jan 2016 #42
Real change like gutting welfare, gutting financial regulations jeff47 Jan 2016 #17
They are single issues lewebley3 Jan 2016 #27
And we're not supposed to note the pattern? jeff47 Jan 2016 #29
The pattern is obvious: the powerful play while the powerless pay. winter is coming Jan 2016 #44
+1000 noiretextatique Jan 2016 #28
HRC is doing fine. She'll be okay. underthematrix Jan 2016 #51
We hope lewebley3 Jan 2016 #62
I think the HRC bashers are frustrated and getting underthematrix Jan 2016 #77
Outstanding! Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #4
K&R Segami Jan 2016 #5
Great post, Tom. Ron Green Jan 2016 #6
...! KoKo Jan 2016 #7
You do write MuseRider Jan 2016 #8
Glad to be on the same side of this as you also, but I look forward to post primary season Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #50
Beautifully written! Thank you! fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #11
Very well said, Tom! blondie58 Jan 2016 #12
Absolutely agree!!! SoapBox Jan 2016 #13
K & R ! TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #15
Most Excellent Post !!! - K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #16
Excellent post! in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #20
Awesome post Tom! Playinghardball Jan 2016 #21
There are far too many "democrats" who suck up to the rich. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #23
I am not sure ymetca Jan 2016 #30
Thanks, Tom. Good work and spot on. Jack Rabbit Jan 2016 #33
this is utterly brilliant. You've captured so well what I've been observing for many years. Thanks. NRaleighLiberal Jan 2016 #34
K&R CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #36
Once again nail on head Armstead Jan 2016 #37
Kick rec Teamster Jeff Jan 2016 #39
K & R. Excellent, excellent post. historylovr Jan 2016 #41
K &R azmom Jan 2016 #43
Terrific post; thanks Tom!!!! Scuba Jan 2016 #45
I diagree. I do not believe Sanders shows one bit of leadership capabilities. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #46
What is his aprproval rating among VT voters, those who know him best? Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #47
Who cares? Vermont is a minor state that is meaningless in a naitonal election. eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #48
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #54
Bullshit. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #55
this person believes... SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #57
The economy IS doing well, it is undeniable. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #60
it is clear that your measure for judging the stability of the economy is much different than many SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #61
Postive job growth for more than 80 months is an undeniably stable economy... MohRokTah Jan 2016 #63
You make my point SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #64
Do you really enjoy ignoring reality? MohRokTah Jan 2016 #65
What is reality? SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #66
Reality is we are in a good economy that keeps getting better. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #67
so silly SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #68
So silly MohRokTah Jan 2016 #70
no more with you SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #71
Because you have no argmuent other than to ignore reality. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #72
be well SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #73
I'll be better after 8 years of more ecomonic expansion under Hillary. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #74
try some Richard wolf SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #75
Try some Paul Krugman. MohRokTah Jan 2016 #76
Eloquently stated, Utopian Leftist Jan 2016 #49
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #52
Excellent, you touched on so many different points that need to be addressed ... slipslidingaway Jan 2016 #53
confront? Locrian Jan 2016 #58
K&R raouldukelives Jan 2016 #59
Unless he doesn't win... brooklynite Jan 2016 #69
Very well written piece Oilwellian Jan 2016 #78
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»There is No National Lead...»Reply #0