2016 Postmortem

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)

60. I guess you convenently forgot where I said it is *one* of the reasons?

Reply to Fawke Em (Reply #39)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 12:52 AM

Jan 2016

Not the main, or only reason

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

109 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sexism and Misogyny exist. FACT. [View all] boston bean Jan 2016 OP

That is true artislife Jan 2016 #1

Actually, it's about half and half. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #37

It would be an awful thing if women were in lock step. Amimnoch Jan 2016 #80

Thanks for that. haikugal Jan 2016 #101

There's never been a Socialist president of either gender. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #2

America rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #25

Do we consider gender over issues until we have had 51% of Presidents be women? n/t JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #26

No rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #27

So you don't think we should vote gender over issues to reach some sort of parity? JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #30

Gender is an issue. okasha Jan 2016 #50

No, gender is a personal attribute, wholly uncorrelated with being an effective leader. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #51

Not what I said. okasha Jan 2016 #53

. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #54

No it is not. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #102

Beg to differ. If we are asked about the things Bernie wants to do, PatrickforO Jan 2016 #77

And there never will be. YoungDemCA Jan 2016 #44

If my candidate cant be the nominee, I want to support Hillary the way I did Obama randys1 Jan 2016 #3

You're a good dude. Ty nt ProudToBeLiberal Jan 2016 #5

Ty randys1 Jan 2016 #7

But I won't be proud to elect another corporatist - no matter that person's gender. eom Fawke Em Jan 2016 #38

So well said mcar Jan 2016 #45

You are a credit to your candidate, BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #84

And women will still support the progressive in the race even if he's an icky boy. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #4

If only Bernie were a woman.... woe is Bernie.... boston bean Jan 2016 #8

Just being a woman isn't enough. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #10

Who said it was treasonous? me?? I don't think so. boston bean Jan 2016 #12

You raise a good point.... Sheepshank Jan 2016 #93

K&R. It is sad that some want us to feel ashamed to say that *one* of the reasons lunamagica Jan 2016 #6

Did you support Palin? Fawke Em Jan 2016 #39

I guess you convenently forgot where I said it is *one* of the reasons? lunamagica Jan 2016 #60

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #64

Would you see that "better, brighter future" if Carly Fiorina became President? Jim Lane Jan 2016 #43

Didn't you read that it was ONE of the reasons? Why do you people overlook that? lunamagica Jan 2016 #63

I am a woman and I think that Bernie Sanders would have more of a positive impact... demmiblue Jan 2016 #9

I 100% disagree. boston bean Jan 2016 #11

I will agree to disagree, then. demmiblue Jan 2016 #16

Fine, I already did disagree with you. Didn't expect my words to change your mind. boston bean Jan 2016 #17

Okay. n/t demmiblue Jan 2016 #18

It won't help me, at all! Fawke Em Jan 2016 #40

I'm a woman too and ITA 100%. He's on my side. She isn't. Simple as that. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #13

+ a zillion n/t MissDeeds Jan 2016 #19

+10 840high Jan 2016 #31

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #70

Are you really sure about it BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #87

I am. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #90

Hillary's vote on late term abortions - yes, pure pandering at the expense of women! CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #92

Yes, I am, and I'm sick of the condescension from Hillary fans. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #91

If you are getting "condescension" from my BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #95

"Globally, no candidate has done more for women's rights than Secretary Clinton" lunamagica Jan 2016 #15

^^^THIS^^^ boston bean Jan 2016 #23

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #65

EXCEPT when it comes to supporting a living wage for women. notadmblnd Jan 2016 #103

^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #20

I used to hire people. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #14

Of course it exists. Beacool Jan 2016 #21

I agree with both of you in that regard. demmiblue Jan 2016 #24

Wow. That is fucked up. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #29

Gah... I just looked at his/her profile. demmiblue Jan 2016 #33

They're a Hillary supporter, why would they block one of their own? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #34

Perhaps because Hillary Group hosts okasha Jan 2016 #52

Hillary group waited on me to post and then blocked me. So, it cuts both ways. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #55

And your post was contrary to the SOP. okasha Jan 2016 #56

No. sorry it was not. You are wrong. I did NOT violate the SOP. Science has nothing to do with it. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #57

There have been many posts mindwalker_i Jan 2016 #22

Yes, they do exist, agreed up to this point. sadoldgirl Jan 2016 #28

Thank you. 840high Jan 2016 #32

Poverty is a women's issue. Prism Jan 2016 #35

Define "Wall Street politician" YoungDemCA Jan 2016 #46

Most important word in your post is "realistic"! George II Jan 2016 #48

Indeed. Skidmore Jan 2016 #89

Are you even a liberal? Prism Jan 2016 #73

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #68

I have some women friends who are furious at PP right now loyalsister Jan 2016 #36

I guess if their reputation is oh so damaged then poor women will just not seek help there right? leftofcool Jan 2016 #83

During the debates, Hillary was the ONLY Dem candidate BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #88

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2016 #41

It exists all over this board ... LannyDeVaney Jan 2016 #42

She's contrived...she isn't genuine in any way. haikugal Jan 2016 #104

Language used to desribe women on this board prove you to be correct. nt LexVegas Jan 2016 #47

BLASPHEMY! On today's DU, at least. Refreshing and realistic. Thanks. George II Jan 2016 #49

Yes ismnotwasm Jan 2016 #58

K & R, thanks BB, when we are accused of voting for Hillary Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #59

I always wondered what happend to that kid! Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #61

Fact: many Hillary haters love warren! So try something else! Nt Logical Jan 2016 #62

Warren's not running against St. Bernard of Burlington. okasha Jan 2016 #66

What do you have against St. Bernards? Ken Burch Jan 2016 #71

The OP did not say "Hillary haters" hate women. Your post does not follow. ieoeja Jan 2016 #94

Bernie is a girl's best friend!!! Live and Learn Jan 2016 #67

None of us disagree. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #69

Sexism? Obviously. Some people will select a presidential candidate solely by gender. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2016 #72

Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #74

Bernie showed his true spots again tonight on Hayes. Starry Messenger Jan 2016 #75

I almost hope she gets in so in 4 or 8 years you can all see how little difference she will make CBGLuthier Jan 2016 #76

What a concidence, I've said the same thing about Sanders. Amimnoch Jan 2016 #81

I vote for the person not supported by the banks, corporations, the war industry CBGLuthier Jan 2016 #82

I vote for the one that just about EVERYBODY is backing. Amimnoch Jan 2016 #85

Jury Results on the name removed.. this is the kind of thing we're dealing with here.. Cha Jan 2016 #78

I laugh my ass off at all of these "liberals" who wet their pants in abject terror at black folks Number23 Jan 2016 #96

Booom! I'm glad you got to see this, 23.. the prevailing insanity needs to be exposed. Cha Jan 2016 #97

Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2016 #106

yes they exist elana i am Jan 2016 #79

Her supporters either willfully or ignorantly do not get that. djean111 Jan 2016 #86

Sarah Palin decidedly had a chance. Where were you and your sermon then? DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #98

Why do you bring Palin up here? sheshe2 Jan 2016 #100

Then you're on my side, and at cross-purposes with the OP. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #105

Actually no. sheshe2 Jan 2016 #107

Don't be sorry, at least not if it's insincere. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #108

"You guys attacking her?" sheshe2 Jan 2016 #109

Yeah? Splinter Cell Jan 2016 #99