Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sexism and Misogyny exist. FACT. [View all]BlueMTexpat
(15,689 posts)87. Are you really sure about it
being that simple? Check out his most recent interview (1/7/16) with Chris Hayes and decide for yourself.
Hillary unquestionably has an exceptional track record on women's rights and it is one that resounds throughout the world.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do we consider gender over issues until we have had 51% of Presidents be women? n/t
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#26
So you don't think we should vote gender over issues to reach some sort of parity?
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#30
No, gender is a personal attribute, wholly uncorrelated with being an effective leader.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#51
If my candidate cant be the nominee, I want to support Hillary the way I did Obama
randys1
Jan 2016
#3
But I won't be proud to elect another corporatist - no matter that person's gender. eom
Fawke Em
Jan 2016
#38
And women will still support the progressive in the race even if he's an icky boy.
beam me up scottie
Jan 2016
#4
K&R. It is sad that some want us to feel ashamed to say that *one* of the reasons
lunamagica
Jan 2016
#6
Would you see that "better, brighter future" if Carly Fiorina became President?
Jim Lane
Jan 2016
#43
Didn't you read that it was ONE of the reasons? Why do you people overlook that?
lunamagica
Jan 2016
#63
I am a woman and I think that Bernie Sanders would have more of a positive impact...
demmiblue
Jan 2016
#9
Fine, I already did disagree with you. Didn't expect my words to change your mind.
boston bean
Jan 2016
#17
I'm a woman too and ITA 100%. He's on my side. She isn't. Simple as that.
CharlotteVale
Jan 2016
#13
Hillary's vote on late term abortions - yes, pure pandering at the expense of women!
CharlotteVale
Jan 2016
#92
"Globally, no candidate has done more for women's rights than Secretary Clinton"
lunamagica
Jan 2016
#15
No. sorry it was not. You are wrong. I did NOT violate the SOP. Science has nothing to do with it.
Hiraeth
Jan 2016
#57
I guess if their reputation is oh so damaged then poor women will just not seek help there right?
leftofcool
Jan 2016
#83
Sexism? Obviously. Some people will select a presidential candidate solely by gender. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Jan 2016
#72
I almost hope she gets in so in 4 or 8 years you can all see how little difference she will make
CBGLuthier
Jan 2016
#76
I vote for the person not supported by the banks, corporations, the war industry
CBGLuthier
Jan 2016
#82
Jury Results on the name removed.. this is the kind of thing we're dealing with here..
Cha
Jan 2016
#78
I laugh my ass off at all of these "liberals" who wet their pants in abject terror at black folks
Number23
Jan 2016
#96
Booom! I'm glad you got to see this, 23.. the prevailing insanity needs to be exposed.
Cha
Jan 2016
#97
Sarah Palin decidedly had a chance. Where were you and your sermon then?
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2016
#98