2016 Postmortem

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)

169. yup...I called it and you are taking the defensive posture

Reply to cali (Reply #164)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 03:01 PM

Jan 2016

it's ok.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

184 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No, I don't stand with Planned Parenthood in their endorsement of Hillary [View all] cali Jan 2016 OP

Why not post in the original thread. This seems like a callout OP. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #1

Not meta at all. djean111 Jan 2016 #3

Again, why not reply in the original thread... MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #6

It is not up to you to condescendingly decide when and where people post. djean111 Jan 2016 #9

Didn't say it was up to me. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #11

Because that other thread is exploitative bullshit that should not control discussion of Planned Bluenorthwest Jan 2016 #17

But that is the purpose of an endorsement. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #18

Absolutely you put skin in the game... in the down and dirty game of politics... Bubzer Jan 2016 #40

You think there are Democrats who will stop supporting PP... MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #42

Interesting that you think yourself the gatekeeper of what makes a person a Democrat. Bubzer Jan 2016 #45

Bully for you. Keep pumping that non-support of PP. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #50

Oh, I do support PP... I don't support hillary Bubzer Jan 2016 #53

Enough of this nonsense. All Bernie supporters support PP. senz Jan 2016 #107

you got any snacks at YOUR party SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #101

Why do you care? Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #27

+1000 George II Jan 2016 #64

You are absolutely right. I wanted people to see this. So? cali Jan 2016 #120

Maybe Cali didn't know she needed to get your approval for this sort of thing. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #159

Are you really telling women we can't respond with our own thread? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #4

Of course not. The first three sentences of the OP are perfect, IMO. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #10

That's not your call, and how do you know so much about meta? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #12

I've been reading this board since '03. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #13

Didn't you get the memo? leftofcool Jan 2016 #114

Except that poster was the one attempting to silence cali by trying to get her thread locked. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #117

That would work for mel pennylane100 Jan 2016 #138

Probably a long term lurker uppityperson Jan 2016 #14

I probably hold the DU record for lurking. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #20

Amen brother Glamrock Jan 2016 #21

Yep stevil Jan 2016 #38

To you and Glamrock above. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #47

Mediawhoresonline.. . That's also where I got my link to DU, so long ago. oasis Jan 2016 #78

I think a lot of old-time DUers did. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #86

Republicans were the target of DU attacks waaaaay back when. oasis Jan 2016 #87

Because the loudest who remain on this site are not Dems. MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #89

Thanks MeNMyVolt. Have a great 2016. (eom) oasis Jan 2016 #100

The DLC, 3rd Way, Bill Clinton (especially Trade Policies), triangulation, bvar22 Jan 2016 #183

Hmmm~ sheshe2 Jan 2016 #70

You forgot to ask first. pangaia Jan 2016 #58

Oops! Forgot my place for a minute! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #59

Because it's important to me. cali Jan 2016 #75

Isn't a post calling out a post for calling out another post or thread "meta"? JDPriestly Jan 2016 #105

I worked for PP and Hillary with others have been great Friends lewebley3 Jan 2016 #178

Well said, cali. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #2

yeah that poll thread this refers to and the other similar ones were pretty fucking scummy. m-lekktor Jan 2016 #5

Yep. Slimy azmom Jan 2016 #15

Preach it. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #22

How many times have we seen sarge43 Jan 2016 #31

I agree, it is a slimy, underhanded, dishonest tactic. senz Jan 2016 #106

K&R I also support PP, but not the candidate they endorsed. Scuba Jan 2016 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author MeNMyVolt Jan 2016 #8

Its called projection tularetom Jan 2016 #16

Jury Results .... TheFarS1de Jan 2016 #72

Yup, I said something similar in the thread this is referring to mindwalker_i Jan 2016 #19

Fully agree Old Codger Jan 2016 #23

I feel exactly the same way. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #24

well Robbins Jan 2016 #25

Got it in one! Bubzer Jan 2016 #44

I think it's wrong Armstead Jan 2016 #26

It was a silly move and it has potential to alienate some of the groups funders. I suppose they get Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #30

do Sanders and OM donors to PP get a refund? Armstead Jan 2016 #35

I can't say I disagree. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #39

I hate to think that way but this pisses me off Armstead Jan 2016 #43

Yeah, that was the League of Conservation Voters Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #96

The wealthy liberals club Armstead Jan 2016 #98

What's the difference between this and the head of the DNC endorsing one candidate? -none Jan 2016 #182

They won't get another penny from me Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2016 #63

I stand with Planned Parenthood and their endorsement of Clinton. Nt NCTraveler Jan 2016 #28

This thread is pretty funny. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #29

Ever had an abortion? cali Jan 2016 #33

Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #37

Yuck it up. You have no shame. morningfog Jan 2016 #79

I'll always support Planned Parenthood... Wounded Bear Jan 2016 #32

I want to see a female President also... Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #49

Liz would be a good one, I believe... Wounded Bear Jan 2016 #88

You believe a Senator is more powerful than a President? Divernan Jan 2016 #116

I didn't say that... Wounded Bear Jan 2016 #137

Can't wait til the Human Rights Campaign invariably endorses the Establishment candidate Prism Jan 2016 #34

You know it. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #41

Hillary came forth with support for LGBT folks when her pollsters told her it was advantageous Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #51

And Bernie has supported them for decades. Fawke Em Jan 2016 #95

Let's see now. I support PP. I don't support Hillary, SheilaT Jan 2016 #36

Neither do I. I am a staunch defender of Planned Parenthood, but the leadership got this one wrong. Still In Wisconsin Jan 2016 #46

We do too. We've contributing to PP for decades. And, will continue to do so. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #48

Me neither. nt truebluegreen Jan 2016 #52

Me neither! Duval Jan 2016 #56

You don't get to decide that, the leadership of PP did.... Historic NY Jan 2016 #54

Got it, Cali! K&R Duval Jan 2016 #55

The endorsement of Planned Parenthood is a major endorsement for the Clinton campaign Gothmog Jan 2016 #57

K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #60

One more group I will no longer support! emsimon33 Jan 2016 #61

I hope you're being sarcastic. n/t tammywammy Jan 2016 #66

Should've stayed on the sidelines.... andrewv1 Jan 2016 #67

^^ This ^^ senz Jan 2016 #108

That will go down as one of the stupidest moves any organization could make. andrewv1 Jan 2016 #62

What "man"? George II Jan 2016 #65

Trying to get cali to call out someone so you can prod her into another hide? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #68

Figure it out. cali Jan 2016 #74

I agree, only a "man" in quotes would engage in such morningfog Jan 2016 #82

But we don't even know what the man is that is referred to - no link, no quote, just....... George II Jan 2016 #83

I know. The OP knows. You know. morningfog Jan 2016 #84

Yep. Game playing. cali Jan 2016 #85

Maybe trying to get your post hidden. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #97

Sorry, no I don't. George II Jan 2016 #94

You aren't that dumb, George. jeff47 Jan 2016 #142

That seems to be the only thing you ever say to me. Read the OP and my comments. George II Jan 2016 #143

That's because it's about 75% of what you do on DU these days. jeff47 Jan 2016 #145

Isn't that precisely what your function/objective is in this discussion? Care to comment on the.... George II Jan 2016 #150

No one has forgotten the Oath Daddy George Took at the other site. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #161

GOod lord. Since you want to play that dumb, I'll assume it is not an act. morningfog Jan 2016 #172

How do we know all that you said? As I've pointed out (several times), there was no direct... George II Jan 2016 #173

Because we aren't fucking stupid. morningfog Jan 2016 #175

Alert results kwassa Jan 2016 #180

Thanks for posting the results! morningfog Jan 2016 #181

Damn, 100 recs already. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #69

Thanks, Scottie cali Jan 2016 #90

Don't mention it! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #93

I feel you Babel_17 Jan 2016 #71

She isn't even all that strong on reproductive rights eridani Jan 2016 #73

Thank you for posting this. Good points, very pertinent. senz Jan 2016 #110

yeah, it's not a matter of neutrality or of pandering, but of understanding MisterP Jan 2016 #184

I'll always support them (and I mean support as in $$$) BlueJazz Jan 2016 #76

Ignore the passive aggressive trolls. morningfog Jan 2016 #77

nope. Not on this and never from men. cali Jan 2016 #80

Understood. Give them hell. morningfog Jan 2016 #81

Both men and women have opinions treestar Jan 2016 #91

Boohoo to you. cali Jan 2016 #92

And when a man tries to pit women against each other for sport we get to call that out. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #99

DSB did not do that. treestar Jan 2016 #139

That's your opinion, not a fact. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #152

If she wants to differ with PP she gets to do that treestar Jan 2016 #165

No she's not wrong, that poster admitted he was exploiting PP for "fun". beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #167

K&R nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #102

that kind of logic seems more like right wing thinking. Kali Jan 2016 #103

Same here. Planned Parenthood should not have endorsed any candidate. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #104

You're right that they shouldn't have jeopardized their relationship senz Jan 2016 #111

Bernie has HRC so scared, she forced PP into this premature endorsement. Divernan Jan 2016 #118

tell it Cali tell it retrowire Jan 2016 #109

I'll alert the media. nt arely staircase Jan 2016 #112

really. Amimnoch Jan 2016 #113

Meltdown? The meltdown in this thread is all Hillary supporters cali Jan 2016 #121

You're being an emotional uppity woman again, cali. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #122

Obnoxious and snotty. Amimnoch Jan 2016 #124

And uppity, don't forget that while you're chastising me! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #125

Your words not mine. Amimnoch Jan 2016 #126

Showing how I think of myself? No, thank YOU for proving my point! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #127

I was # 7 me b zola Jan 2016 #129

Thanks. Some folks really want me gone. cali Jan 2016 #130

It was on me, the third failed alert since last night. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #132

You and BMuS have been strong, consistant voices that won't be cowed me b zola Jan 2016 #133

Ah, the swarm is up early I see. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #131

There should be some remedy for being stalked me b zola Jan 2016 #134

Congratulations me b zola! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #135

Thank You BMuS! me b zola Jan 2016 #136

Nope, we're quite happy with the endorsement. Amimnoch Jan 2016 #123

And I congratulate Hillary's campaign and supporters on it. cali Jan 2016 #128

Translation: Bernie did not get the coveted PP endorsement and now PP is just disgusting leftofcool Jan 2016 #115

Wow. You translate "I've supported PP for decades. I will continue supporting them" as cali Jan 2016 #119

Pretty much...otherwise why the OP? nt Sheepshank Jan 2016 #140

Seriously, the op makes it clear that I support PP. Furthermore, I don't cali Jan 2016 #146

of course you begrudge the endorsment Sheepshank Jan 2016 #147

Wow. Disgusting to tell me I begrudge the endorsement cali Jan 2016 #148

if you don't begrudge then it's sour grapes Sheepshank Jan 2016 #149

So saying I support PP and congratulating Hillary and supporters on the endorsement is cali Jan 2016 #153

in what way is it germane? nt Sheepshank Jan 2016 #154

You are a man telling a woman who has repeatedly expressed support for cali Jan 2016 #155

yeah...well I think narrow minded assumptions are gross Sheepshank Jan 2016 #156

More dissembling from you. Ugh. I have in no way griped about PP cali Jan 2016 #160

you griped. It is what it is Sheepshank Jan 2016 #163

Bwahaha. Keep digging. Keep making shit up. cali Jan 2016 #164

yup...I called it and you are taking the defensive posture Sheepshank Jan 2016 #169

Wow, I'm just dumbfounded by the comments directed your way. George II Jan 2016 #158

Still supportive of Planned Parenthood dragonfly301 Jan 2016 #141

"Innocuous" and "fun" progressoid Jan 2016 #144

I support their mission but I can no longer support their organization. hay rick Jan 2016 #151

I'm a Hillary supporter but let's get real. Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #157

Thanks. I actually have no problem with anyone trumpeting the endorsement cali Jan 2016 #162

THese two are not mutually exclusive. I support PP but cannot support Hillary Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #166

If you've supported them for decades BainsBane Jan 2016 #168

It's right there in the op. Period. cali Jan 2016 #170

I understand this concept may be alien here BainsBane Jan 2016 #176

Yawn ismnotwasm Jan 2016 #171

I support Planned Parenthood. I do not support this . Autumn Jan 2016 #174

A strange endorsement. Bernie is also a strong supporter of reproductive freedom, and FAR less Doctor_J Jan 2016 #177

Its easy understand if you were not a Sanders supporter lewebley3 Jan 2016 #179