2016 Postmortem

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)

36. ok i'll bite...

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 06:09 PM

Jan 2016

as much as biden tends to go off at the mouth, i hold suspicious any purported "randomness" of his regret. and if this is gonna go bad for clinton, of course someone tipped off biden. the ptb do NOT want bernie as the nom, so they will try and draft biden at the convention and all hell will break loose

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Clinton tell an aide to remove classified markings from a document & email it? [View all] peacebird Jan 2016 OP

Depends on who you happen to be supporting Glamrock Jan 2016 #1

Haha that's funny. Is there even such a thing as truth anymore? thereismore Jan 2016 #13

I support Bernie and have no idea if this is true or not. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #67

I've never heard of this source before, either. If this report is credible, it will turn up winter is coming Jan 2016 #2

Laura Ingram is one of their writers. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #3

Ah... Well that would explain it then. I will delete- update- no delete cuz its on CNN peacebird Jan 2016 #8

Ah, well there's a deal breaker Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #35

The OP is updated to include a link to the State Dept pdf of the messages in question peacebird Jan 2016 #46

Since your google seems to be broken... zappaman Jan 2016 #4

Its very, very important to post anti_Hillary articles first Sheepshank Jan 2016 #25

Is LI the only one reporting this? InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #31

CNN,CBS also have it peacebird Jan 2016 #47

State Department has the actual email: bunnies Jan 2016 #5

Shit. That is not good. n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #14

For some reason the link won't open for me ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #18

Maybe I don't speak diplomat speak; but ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #28

Sorry, but, to me, it looks like Hillary's goose is cooked. At least we all still have Bernie! to fall back on. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #32

I haven't heard of them but CNN has it on their website. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #6

Since its on CNN, i will leave the thread. peacebird Jan 2016 #10

I suggest you edit the OP to add a direct link to the State Dept pdf. n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #33

Done just now, thanks! peacebird Jan 2016 #43

You mean "CNN says that a Republican says it's disturbing" millbrooky Jan 2016 #45

The New York Times states that this was released from the State Dept. and a PDF Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #49

Best, most unself-aware Hillary Clinton quote from article: TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #50

Well if that Koch-head Chuck Grassley (R-liar) said it is "disturbing" I must take this seriously emulatorloo Jan 2016 #51

CBS has the story on their website. TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #7

Wingnut sites have the copy of the email, BUT not the contents 4139 Jan 2016 #9

The State Department is a "wingnut site"? bunnies Jan 2016 #12

I didn't mean them... Hadn't seen the direct link to State when I wrote it. 4139 Jan 2016 #16

She never thought THIS would become public. leveymg Jan 2016 #11

She is assuming that her status makes her untouchable. peacebird Jan 2016 #19

That is what really scares me about the prospect of her becoming President and CIC. leveymg Jan 2016 #20

She'll hock our futures, but never put her own wealth at risk. peacebird Jan 2016 #21

That's another reason to hope she fails again. leveymg Jan 2016 #22

Hope she fails to secure the nomination, because she is unelectable in the general peacebird Jan 2016 #23

Rec'd because I just served on a jury for an alert to censor and hide. polly7 Jan 2016 #15

sigh. Apparently it is already on CNN and CBS.... peacebird Jan 2016 #17

The media will chew Hillary up with these kind of controversial stories being raised every day... why not go with a safer choice? Bernie! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #48

peacebird - please edit post to link to direct source. Found on dept of state foia site ghurley Jan 2016 #24

Ok, thanks. Have editted OP to include State Dept link peacebird Jan 2016 #41

The woman is a disaster. bowens43 Jan 2016 #26

If the accusation is true; i.e., that Secretary Clinton ordered the change razorman Jan 2016 #27

You may newblewtoo Jan 2016 #30

ok i'll bite... restorefreedom Jan 2016 #36

That's kind of what I was thinking, although I do not generally subscribe razorman Jan 2016 #59

lol....it does attribute some planning abilities to them restorefreedom Jan 2016 #66

This is why you have to carefully parse her statements. morningfog Jan 2016 #37

Apparently it does not really matter whether razorman Jan 2016 #61

A political excuse, not a legal one Yupster Jan 2016 #64

A very conservative source for propagands. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #29

Updated OP to include link to State Dept pdf showing the exchange. peacebird Jan 2016 #44

There is no indication, none, that the contents of the email were classified Godhumor Jan 2016 #34

That's what I was thinking. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #38

The why the instruction to remove indentifying heading? morningfog Jan 2016 #39

The header is where it indicates to send Secure Godhumor Jan 2016 #40

No- the headings indicate classification level not how to send Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #57

No, the heading also indicated security of communication level Godhumor Jan 2016 #60

If I'm instructed to change markings on documents tammywammy Jan 2016 #42

Clinton-Cardin call recalled no classified elements to the conversation. BlueStateLib Jan 2016 #52

Incorrect. Once it's marked classified it's considered such until officially downgraded Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #55

We don't know how it was marked, just that they were trying to send it to Clinton TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #56

They wouldn't be going to the trouble of using the secure fax Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #58

I assume her aide would have known to send it nonsecure if it was OK to go that route, rather than TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #62

Who are the 'they' having trouble with the insecure fax? HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #53

We don't know how it was officially marked, or exactly what it contained. TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #54

Secure faxes have a device on each end to encrypt the data jeff47 Jan 2016 #65

Yes, if this is all -inside- the state dept, it may be HRC could change a classification HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #68

It does seem odd that talking points would be protected. Perhaps they were FOUO. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #69

I believe this is a felony Prism Jan 2016 #63

Did Clinton hire Cuban drug smugglers to kill Vince Foster? baldguy Jan 2016 #70

Very interesting! cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #71

Lifezette is still up but the FOIA page is gone.... Curiouser & curiouser..... peacebird Apr 2016 #72