2016 Postmortem

peacebird

(14,195 posts)

46. The OP is updated to include a link to the State Dept pdf of the messages in question

Reply to Bobbie Jo (Reply #35)

Fri Jan 8, 2016, 06:41 PM

Jan 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did Clinton tell an aide to remove classified markings from a document & email it? [View all] peacebird Jan 2016 OP

Depends on who you happen to be supporting Glamrock Jan 2016 #1

Haha that's funny. Is there even such a thing as truth anymore? thereismore Jan 2016 #13

I support Bernie and have no idea if this is true or not. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #67

I've never heard of this source before, either. If this report is credible, it will turn up winter is coming Jan 2016 #2

Laura Ingram is one of their writers. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #3

Ah... Well that would explain it then. I will delete- update- no delete cuz its on CNN peacebird Jan 2016 #8

Ah, well there's a deal breaker Bobbie Jo Jan 2016 #35

The OP is updated to include a link to the State Dept pdf of the messages in question peacebird Jan 2016 #46

Since your google seems to be broken... zappaman Jan 2016 #4

Its very, very important to post anti_Hillary articles first Sheepshank Jan 2016 #25

Is LI the only one reporting this? InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #31

CNN,CBS also have it peacebird Jan 2016 #47

State Department has the actual email: bunnies Jan 2016 #5

Shit. That is not good. n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #14

For some reason the link won't open for me ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #18

Maybe I don't speak diplomat speak; but ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #28

Sorry, but, to me, it looks like Hillary's goose is cooked. At least we all still have Bernie! to fall back on. InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #32

I haven't heard of them but CNN has it on their website. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #6

Since its on CNN, i will leave the thread. peacebird Jan 2016 #10

I suggest you edit the OP to add a direct link to the State Dept pdf. n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #33

Done just now, thanks! peacebird Jan 2016 #43

You mean "CNN says that a Republican says it's disturbing" millbrooky Jan 2016 #45

The New York Times states that this was released from the State Dept. and a PDF Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #49

Best, most unself-aware Hillary Clinton quote from article: TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #50

Well if that Koch-head Chuck Grassley (R-liar) said it is "disturbing" I must take this seriously emulatorloo Jan 2016 #51

CBS has the story on their website. TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #7

Wingnut sites have the copy of the email, BUT not the contents 4139 Jan 2016 #9

The State Department is a "wingnut site"? bunnies Jan 2016 #12

I didn't mean them... Hadn't seen the direct link to State when I wrote it. 4139 Jan 2016 #16

She never thought THIS would become public. leveymg Jan 2016 #11

She is assuming that her status makes her untouchable. peacebird Jan 2016 #19

That is what really scares me about the prospect of her becoming President and CIC. leveymg Jan 2016 #20

She'll hock our futures, but never put her own wealth at risk. peacebird Jan 2016 #21

That's another reason to hope she fails again. leveymg Jan 2016 #22

Hope she fails to secure the nomination, because she is unelectable in the general peacebird Jan 2016 #23

Rec'd because I just served on a jury for an alert to censor and hide. polly7 Jan 2016 #15

sigh. Apparently it is already on CNN and CBS.... peacebird Jan 2016 #17

The media will chew Hillary up with these kind of controversial stories being raised every day... why not go with a safer choice? Bernie! InAbLuEsTaTe Jan 2016 #48

peacebird - please edit post to link to direct source. Found on dept of state foia site ghurley Jan 2016 #24

Ok, thanks. Have editted OP to include State Dept link peacebird Jan 2016 #41

The woman is a disaster. bowens43 Jan 2016 #26

If the accusation is true; i.e., that Secretary Clinton ordered the change razorman Jan 2016 #27

You may newblewtoo Jan 2016 #30

ok i'll bite... restorefreedom Jan 2016 #36

That's kind of what I was thinking, although I do not generally subscribe razorman Jan 2016 #59

lol....it does attribute some planning abilities to them restorefreedom Jan 2016 #66

This is why you have to carefully parse her statements. morningfog Jan 2016 #37

Apparently it does not really matter whether razorman Jan 2016 #61

A political excuse, not a legal one Yupster Jan 2016 #64

A very conservative source for propagands. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #29

Updated OP to include link to State Dept pdf showing the exchange. peacebird Jan 2016 #44

There is no indication, none, that the contents of the email were classified Godhumor Jan 2016 #34

That's what I was thinking. eom. 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #38

The why the instruction to remove indentifying heading? morningfog Jan 2016 #39

The header is where it indicates to send Secure Godhumor Jan 2016 #40

No- the headings indicate classification level not how to send Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #57

No, the heading also indicated security of communication level Godhumor Jan 2016 #60

If I'm instructed to change markings on documents tammywammy Jan 2016 #42

Clinton-Cardin call recalled no classified elements to the conversation. BlueStateLib Jan 2016 #52

Incorrect. Once it's marked classified it's considered such until officially downgraded Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #55

We don't know how it was marked, just that they were trying to send it to Clinton TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #56

They wouldn't be going to the trouble of using the secure fax Lee-Lee Jan 2016 #58

I assume her aide would have known to send it nonsecure if it was OK to go that route, rather than TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #62

Who are the 'they' having trouble with the insecure fax? HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #53

We don't know how it was officially marked, or exactly what it contained. TwilightGardener Jan 2016 #54

Secure faxes have a device on each end to encrypt the data jeff47 Jan 2016 #65

Yes, if this is all -inside- the state dept, it may be HRC could change a classification HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #68

It does seem odd that talking points would be protected. Perhaps they were FOUO. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #69

I believe this is a felony Prism Jan 2016 #63

Did Clinton hire Cuban drug smugglers to kill Vince Foster? baldguy Jan 2016 #70

Very interesting! cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #71

Lifezette is still up but the FOIA page is gone.... Curiouser & curiouser..... peacebird Apr 2016 #72