Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great work gumshoe! morningfog Jan 2016 #1
I'm reminded EdwardBernays Jan 2016 #2
Two plus two is four. nt Cali_Democrat Jan 2016 #7
Cali for the love of Pete HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #16
Have you ever seen an article about Hillary being a Goldwater girl and Republican, Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #45
yep. n/t 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #51
Do they actually support Hillary or just hate Bernie? morningfog Jan 2016 #60
Congrats on 500 posts! bigwillq Jan 2016 #29
She does seem to have little regard for brown children around the globe...nt artislife Jan 2016 #35
Sounds legit. I vaguely remember this. Thought it was odd. cheapdate Jan 2016 #3
Saw nothing about that here Autumn Jan 2016 #4
Thats disturbing. nt LexVegas Jan 2016 #5
Back for more with this canard? Ya'll seem desperate. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #6
No emulatorloo Jan 2016 #8
Oh, you are such a delightful and generous person! sadoldgirl Jan 2016 #9
The only way to take pablum Art_from_Ark Jan 2016 #17
hmmm uponit7771 Jan 2016 #10
Oh, sorry dearrie, I forgot to ask sadoldgirl Jan 2016 #11
Trashed... litlbilly Jan 2016 #12
yep ... taking out the trash. then reading what quality is left. Hiraeth Jan 2016 #62
Me too:) litlbilly Jan 2016 #69
Probably not KingFlorez Jan 2016 #13
Connections, likely yes Paulie Jan 2016 #73
So if I read your outrage correctly catnhatnh Jan 2016 #14
Okay, so how long ago was Hillary Clinton (as an adolescent) a "Goldwater Girl"? George II Jan 2016 #19
How about a far more relevant question, like how long ago she backed "regime change" jeff47 Jan 2016 #36
Is that the topic we're discussing? The subject is Sanders' view of the cause of cervical cancer. George II Jan 2016 #38
It's as relevant as you bringing "Goldwater girl" to the thread. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #40
How? Are you trying to goad me into a hide? George II Jan 2016 #41
Nope, that's your shtick. jeff47 Jan 2016 #42
. George II Jan 2016 #44
"Okay so how long ago was Hillary Clinton..." LOL! cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #53
How can the article Sanders wrote thirty years ago be debunked? Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #47
That's not all. He wrote some pretty flaky stuff. MADem Jan 2016 #59
This is hilarious. I laughed til I cried underthematrix Jan 2016 #15
Could have been a big factor, his abject lack of understanding of women's issues. George II Jan 2016 #18
Not content to be positive about the PP endorsement? nt geek tragedy Jan 2016 #20
how many decades ago was this? Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #21
1972 is the only year the NY Times article gives Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #25
so he wrote that admittedly strange article about 43-44 years ago? Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #27
Yes. NT Eric J in MN Jan 2016 #31
He also cited medical literature from the time. jeff47 Jan 2016 #37
My own mother (1924-2007) used to believe shit like that, so blamed herself for ... Hekate Jan 2016 #22
He did years ago. The OP didn't quite bring that up, since it would hurt her attack. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2016 #33
more likely the RW anti-Mrs. Clinton attacks mixed with years of Republican PP attacks. Sunlei Jan 2016 #23
Ah... he goes to the standard, blame the mom, too. Isn't that nifty. Give it up girls, mom's fault. seabeyond Jan 2016 #24
Or maybe you've scraped through the metal at the bottom of the barrel. pa28 Jan 2016 #26
Oh there is a whiff of desperation in the air, indeed... Purveyor Jan 2016 #28
The more they hit the volume at 11 the happier I get artislife Jan 2016 #39
May I have 10,000 marbles, please? bvf Jan 2016 #54
Hee! artislife Jan 2016 #55
Please post link to article Sanders referred to in Psychosomatic Medicine. /nt philly_bob Jan 2016 #30
Why would you expect there to be an online version of a medical article from the 70s? n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #65
Foolishly, I thought that OP had some source. philly_bob Jan 2016 #75
THE MEME MUST NOT DIE!!!! jeff47 Jan 2016 #32
So, is the belief that chances of prostate cancer are reduced by daily orgasm silly, too? Triana Jan 2016 #34
lemme know if you ever get an answer. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #58
None yet . . . Triana Jan 2016 #74
The best thing about this OP? artislife Jan 2016 #43
2008 is NOT 2016, and Sanders is most definitely NOT Obama. George II Jan 2016 #46
But Hillary is still Hillary. artislife Jan 2016 #48
I doubt they made their decison because Sanders believed a New Age crackpot theory about cancer. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #49
Or perhaps because someones daughter 840high Jan 2016 #56
LOL, did not get fitted for a tin foil hat this election. My oriniginal premise stands. nt Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #67
Well - she was hired. 840high Jan 2016 #71
The notion that could be the only possible reason is laugable. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #72
why didn't you mention tht this article is 43-44 years old and he based Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #50
"cut it out" SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #52
"there is no evidence that orgasms have anything to do with cancer" - ah, not entirely true. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #57
And maybe Debbie Wasserman Schultz advocating throwing medical marijuana users in prison Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #61
trash thread JI7 Jan 2016 #63
If PP believes that Bernie still believes that - then PP is not too bright, IMO. djean111 Jan 2016 #64
The decision by the leadership of PP was purly politically motivated and the good rhett o rick Jan 2016 #66
It sounds stupid now TexasBushwhacker Jan 2016 #68
Planned Parenthood wouldn't care about something so stupid n/t Enrique Jan 2016 #70
ah yes elana i am Jan 2016 #76
your desperation is more and more evident with every post. whether or not she gets the nomination bowens43 Jan 2016 #77
Did something really bad happen today to produce Warren Stupidity Jan 2016 #78
"HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN IS ***NOT*** NERVOUS, YOUSE GUYS!!!!" Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #79
My doctor told me much the same thing when I had cervical cancer. Although she libdem4life Jan 2016 #80
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Maybe Bernie's controvers...»Reply #1