Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
1. Game, set, match.
Fri Sep 28, 2012, 11:19 AM
Sep 2012
Sex-positive feminists who pursue the idea of women having a lot of sex consistently as the expression of their empowerment, freedom, and rebellion against misogynistic control of female sexuality, without giving due respect to voluntary sexual inactivity, fail to realize that not only are they creating a new, unhealthy paradigm of sexuality for women–one that ironically circles back around to feed into rape culture–but that they are also affirming mainstream masculinity’s compulsory sexuality tenet that plays a part in men’s misogynistic treatment of women. The kind of compulsory sexuality that feminists recognize as overtly anti-woman is the kind that demands women be sexually available to all men, at all times, for the sake of pleasing the men. The kind of compulsory sexuality sprouting from sex-positive feminism is actually more along the lines of masculinity’s compulsory sexuality: creating shame around not having sex, rather than having sex.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Game, set, match. MadrasT Sep 2012 #1
i thought it was in this article, but i could not find it when perusing. seabeyond Sep 2012 #4
Amazing outsideworld Sep 2012 #2
you are welcome. seabeyond Sep 2012 #5
Very interesting ismnotwasm Sep 2012 #3
years of marriage.... seabeyond Sep 2012 #6
Basic Instincts MysticLynx Oct 2012 #10
could get people addressing their basic need of 'need' seabeyond Oct 2012 #11
Simplistic basic drives? ChaoticTrilby Oct 2012 #12
i hadnt thought of it in this manner. interesting. lack of desire is how i defined asexual. seabeyond Oct 2012 #13
No offense meant MysticLynx Oct 2012 #14
No worries! ChaoticTrilby Oct 2012 #15
We still flirt ismnotwasm Sep 2012 #7
Yet troubled marriage boards are full of them One_Life_To_Give Oct 2012 #8
i think back to younger ages, and there was not this all incompassing awesome seabeyond Oct 2012 #9
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Male Asexuality and Its C...»Reply #1