Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Showing Original Post only (View all)Is This Famous Photo Fueling Rape Culture? [View all]
This much better piece was linked from the Lounge thread. Thought I'd post it here in case anyone missed it.
I don't think the photo itself fuels rape culture. I do think that a lot of the reactions to it display rape culture really well, though, and that failing to point out and discuss this kind of thing does fuel rape culture.
http://lawsonry.com/2012/08/is-this-famous-photo-fueling-rape-culture/
...
Friedman herself said that the kiss happened so fast and wasnt a big deal, but lets not forget that this was a time in America when women were socialized into property-like gender roles. When George laid Greta over in his arms and she describes him as very strong, certain images of the controlling nature of male socialization and the devaluation of women stemming from that period come to mind. Need a refresher?
...
Considering the social atmosphere at the time, its not that far-fetched to assume that Greta and every other woman who was kissed that day might have thought the same thing that the sailors kissing them were excited, strong, and not asking for permission. If you read the NYPs unraveling of the story, they point out that George admitted to drinking so much that he doesnt even remember grabbing and kissing Greta. But does this make it reprehensible?
Some argue that the celebration was tantamount to New Years Day, where everyone expects to give and receive kisses from willing strangers who are excited to ring in the new year. This, however, doesnt excuse the obvious lack of consent from all accounts. After all, just because you surprise me with a clenching non-consensual kiss and I dismiss it as you just being excited, does that make it any less non-consensual, forced, and selfish on your part?
Others say that its just the way things were back then and that sometimes, you just grabbed a girl and kissed her.
...
...
Friedman herself said that the kiss happened so fast and wasnt a big deal, but lets not forget that this was a time in America when women were socialized into property-like gender roles. When George laid Greta over in his arms and she describes him as very strong, certain images of the controlling nature of male socialization and the devaluation of women stemming from that period come to mind. Need a refresher?
...
Considering the social atmosphere at the time, its not that far-fetched to assume that Greta and every other woman who was kissed that day might have thought the same thing that the sailors kissing them were excited, strong, and not asking for permission. If you read the NYPs unraveling of the story, they point out that George admitted to drinking so much that he doesnt even remember grabbing and kissing Greta. But does this make it reprehensible?
Some argue that the celebration was tantamount to New Years Day, where everyone expects to give and receive kisses from willing strangers who are excited to ring in the new year. This, however, doesnt excuse the obvious lack of consent from all accounts. After all, just because you surprise me with a clenching non-consensual kiss and I dismiss it as you just being excited, does that make it any less non-consensual, forced, and selfish on your part?
Others say that its just the way things were back then and that sometimes, you just grabbed a girl and kissed her.
...
And on that note, about "the way things were back then", I love this post in the comments:
"In the context of that era" is a roundabout way of saying "back then it was okay to do this to women." Anything that disrupts a firmly held belief is going to be considered "reaching," and I'm okay with that. When we're comfortable looking back on cherished American history through a feminist lens we'll have made positive intellectual traction.
In other words, what some people would describe as 'the good old days'.
Another linked piece, this from the NYP, shows an interesting quote. While talking about the moment when Greta saw the picture and realized it was her:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/kiss_is_just_kiss_x8pgRGiSNtEL9zbSO3TTiP/2
Greta, by now married with children, had the same reaction as George: She knew it was her. The seams in my stockings were perfectly straight I was always careful about that, she says. And it was my figure, and my hairdo. I was carrying this little tapestry purse that I owned.
Her husband, now deceased, noticed something else: The odd angle of the womans left thumb. According to Verria, Gretas husband said, You know, when you get very tense, your arm stiffens up and your thumb sticks out just like that.
Greta, by now married with children, had the same reaction as George: She knew it was her. The seams in my stockings were perfectly straight I was always careful about that, she says. And it was my figure, and my hairdo. I was carrying this little tapestry purse that I owned.
Her husband, now deceased, noticed something else: The odd angle of the womans left thumb. According to Verria, Gretas husband said, You know, when you get very tense, your arm stiffens up and your thumb sticks out just like that.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
this is where i sit with that. having to show signs of struggle, is the issue we are having today
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#4
As I said, if it had occurred in any other setting but one so unprecedented, I'd agree
hlthe2b
Oct 2012
#6
thank you. i will clarify. the wonderful thing about du3, we can edit.... and often.
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#11
how could there be malicious intent if men had the right to a woman and a woman was to submit?
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#20
that was then. this is now. If she was not offended why should I be now some 50 odd years later.
Tuesday Afternoon
Oct 2012
#21
What really amazes me are so many of the reactions to anyone who dares to discuss it.
redqueen
Oct 2012
#26
"Now we can at least ask that question" that does not seem to be correct and i am curious
seabeyond
Oct 2012
#30
Colletive wailing against the idea that this was a boundary violation and is not OK
MadrasT
Oct 2012
#33