Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Is it time for a Feminist Manifesto for DU? [View all]patrice
(47,992 posts)35. I'm comfortable with this. It's been a while since I looked into the research very deeply, but
I do remember a characterization of meta-research, research on research, being: there is more variation within the genders than there is between the genders.
If we could put all of those data-sets on top of one another and look at what is left, outside of the overlap, we'd still need to remember that it is the nature of rational empiricism that it is always only a prediction of the less than 100% strength of probabilities of different kinds, so even in those two relatively small and unique and improbable data subsets, female "uniqueness" and male "uniqueness", you STILL have to consider the possibility of exceptions for sameness.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But I wonder if leaving it to individual posts to clarify what feminism is, is a clumsy way of
CTyankee
Nov 2012
#2
Yes, so true. We keep saying it over and over in each and every post of sexism. We need some
CTyankee
Nov 2012
#11
Can you give me an example of what that "sexist in and of itself" would look like? I need
CTyankee
Nov 2012
#17
I don't remember the racist stuff but I do remember the Hillary/sexist stuff and as it turned out
CTyankee
Nov 2012
#20
Yes, I agree. But it was used by some pretty fishy types who suddenly showed up on DU.
CTyankee
Nov 2012
#23
Well, apart from the unique Hillary thing in 04 where there was basically some mischief afoot
CTyankee
Nov 2012
#25
Yep. It's about not sinking to that level, and creating a more level playing field.
bettyellen
Dec 2012
#37
I continue to encounter women who say things like, "You know, I understand the need for
patrice
Nov 2012
#26
Humanist is fine. Everybody is human, after all and I have already made a case for Feminism
CTyankee
Nov 2012
#29
Humanist is certainly one term I'd very much like to re-claim and it certainly at least implies the
patrice
Nov 2012
#30
Probably more diversity : similarity, just riffing again on process . . . link:
patrice
Dec 2012
#34
I'm comfortable with this. It's been a while since I looked into the research very deeply, but
patrice
Dec 2012
#35
Thank you for this, but I must go do my budget, so I will look at it later & get back to us ...
patrice
Dec 2012
#45
i am kickin this to get back to it later. i have been so busy in meta and GD i have not been
seabeyond
Dec 2012
#42