Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

In reply to the discussion: FYI to group members. [View all]

hlthe2b

(114,782 posts)
4. I echo this sentiment from BostonBean. That said (on the issue of alert stalking)....
Mon Apr 8, 2013, 11:44 AM
Apr 2013

It is clear that HOF is being stalked by a few DUers in this regard (just as it seems clear that the Gun Control Reform Activism group is likewise being targeted by its detractors). I am concerned about the ramped up alerting on posts/threads here.. However, in order for us to be able to make a case to admins, I think we need to be able to demonstrate a pattern of thread/post locks and alerts that were absent of any cause or justification.

Our issues are inherently emotion-laden and it is very difficult not to display understandable anger in response to some of the ugly comments and targeted posts found elsewhere on GD. But, I'd like to suggest that we take a pause before hitting the post button and consider if our point can be made sans any language that can be construed by any fair-minded jury member (or admin) as "lock-worthy"...

Maybe also take a look at whether our point is clear or might be misconstrued as saying something we totally had not intended as well, since I increasingly see that occurring--and not simply by those who have a stake in twisting what is said. Please know that I am saying this as much to myself as anyone else, as I know I have a tendency to be misunderstood or to unintentionally antagonize when I post reflexively in response to something that "triggers" and this caused me considerable DU frustration not long ago.

If we do so and a pattern of unsubstantiated alerts continues, we can accumulate the evidence that admins will have to take to heart in determining what action should be taken.

Please take this as no more than my personal suggestion. I do not wish to convey that I have the answers. I would just like to take away some of the "ammunition" being used against us. Know that although I have not addressed the reasons why some may feel cynicism that admins would take action, I do fully understand why many may feel this way. However, in protecting this group, we need to be aware of those who would love nothing more than to seek its disbanding. We can NOT give admins reason to agree.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

FYI to group members. [View all] boston bean Apr 2013 OP
ya know. not everyones mommy. that is what it is feeling like. nt seabeyond Apr 2013 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Apr 2013 #2
I really appreciate that seaglass. boston bean Apr 2013 #3
I echo this sentiment from BostonBean. That said (on the issue of alert stalking).... hlthe2b Apr 2013 #4
why dont you just ask for the moon, from me, lol. i hear ya. will try. though 2 or 3 posts hidden seabeyond Apr 2013 #5
I know, sea... But I used to add qualifiers adnauseum when I thought someone was hlthe2b Apr 2013 #8
Your post would make sense if there was any hope that the owners would Sheldon Cooper Apr 2013 #6
Please know I am in no way suggsting self-censor of WHAT we say... merely hlthe2b Apr 2013 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author boston bean Apr 2013 #7
I hear what you are saying H boston bean Apr 2013 #9
I hear you too and don't disagree in general... hlthe2b Apr 2013 #10
that's on Skinner, not us. boston bean Apr 2013 #11
good advice nt BainsBane Apr 2013 #13
I like to Shake It Out ! DURHAM D Apr 2013 #14
I'm really looking forward to hearing this later... redqueen Apr 2013 #16
and all of the ghouls come out to play..... seabeyond Apr 2013 #17
I think we might have found the HOF anthem! hlthe2b Apr 2013 #18
When we do achieve that mass of evidence BainsBane Apr 2013 #15
I'm not so sure about that... hlthe2b Apr 2013 #19
It looks like someone else has decided to go to ATA BainsBane Apr 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Apr 2013 #21
It's a joke. boston bean Apr 2013 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Apr 2013 #25
An exhaustive list of all the meta/HoF-stalking threads there redqueen Apr 2013 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Apr 2013 #27
and that would simply be the OPS. then find individual posts and wow. lol. they really have nothin' seabeyond Apr 2013 #28
No, there's always the 'which celebrity would you date' thread. redqueen Apr 2013 #29
lol. betcha you are wrong and they are talking about us in those posts also. and no, seabeyond Apr 2013 #30
that would warrant a good number of BainsBane Apr 2013 #23
that alerter should go back to his "Who's the hawtest celebrity" discussions. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2013 #24
Lawd ismnotwasm Apr 2013 #31
!!!!!!!! redqueen Apr 2013 #32
Glad you like ismnotwasm Apr 2013 #33
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»FYI to group members.»Reply #4