Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Rape Culture: 3 Reasons Most Men Are to Blame For Misogyny [View all]ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)24. Here, I'll help
Human rape: revising evolutionary perspectives. more
by Melissa Emery Thompson
The role of biology in understanding human rape has been the subject of heated and not always scientific debate.Our study of pervasive sexual aggression in thehuman species can and should be informed by our less emotion-laden analyses of sexual dynamics in closely related species,and warrants objective analysis of scientific predictions within the context of our complex sociocultural environ-ments.In this chapter,I explore hypotheses proposing that some types of hu-man rape function as sexual coercion.Rape by any definition consists of verbalor physical coercion to engage in sexual activity.However,in the context of this book,and from an evolutionary perspective,sexual coercion is more restric-tively viewed as a component of sexual selection.As such, rape is suggested to be a male reproductive strategypart of a continuum of behaviors,comprising harassment and intimidation,in addition to forced copulation (Clutton-Brock and Parker 1995).Smuts and Smuts (1993) defined sexual coercion as male use of force,or its threat, to increase the chances that a female will mate with the aggressor or to decrease the chances that she will mate with a rival,at some cost to the female. There are significant obstacles to a scientific analysis of rape, including discrepancies in subjective assessment and reporting of rapes by victims. Empirically,however,a larger issue concerns categorization of a range of coercive sexual behaviors into the single behavioral category of rape.From a legal and social perspective, this practice is understandable. In terms of evaluating functional hy-potheses,however,the available data suggest that at least two distinct types of rape should be recognized, depending on the preexisting social relationship
by Melissa Emery Thompson
The role of biology in understanding human rape has been the subject of heated and not always scientific debate.Our study of pervasive sexual aggression in thehuman species can and should be informed by our less emotion-laden analyses of sexual dynamics in closely related species,and warrants objective analysis of scientific predictions within the context of our complex sociocultural environ-ments.In this chapter,I explore hypotheses proposing that some types of hu-man rape function as sexual coercion.Rape by any definition consists of verbalor physical coercion to engage in sexual activity.However,in the context of this book,and from an evolutionary perspective,sexual coercion is more restric-tively viewed as a component of sexual selection.As such, rape is suggested to be a male reproductive strategypart of a continuum of behaviors,comprising harassment and intimidation,in addition to forced copulation (Clutton-Brock and Parker 1995).Smuts and Smuts (1993) defined sexual coercion as male use of force,or its threat, to increase the chances that a female will mate with the aggressor or to decrease the chances that she will mate with a rival,at some cost to the female. There are significant obstacles to a scientific analysis of rape, including discrepancies in subjective assessment and reporting of rapes by victims. Empirically,however,a larger issue concerns categorization of a range of coercive sexual behaviors into the single behavioral category of rape.From a legal and social perspective, this practice is understandable. In terms of evaluating functional hy-potheses,however,the available data suggest that at least two distinct types of rape should be recognized, depending on the preexisting social relationship
http://www.academia.edu/291597/Human_rape_revising_evolutionary_perspectives
There's all kinds of peer reviewed papers and opinion laden books on this topic. I simply wanted to know if you are spouting an uninformed opinion, or if you've put a little effort into it. It's a serious topic, but an interesting debate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No one is making the claim it's all men they're just saying men are the cause of the culture
Arcanetrance
May 2013
#5
It would be nice if they did more than listen and actually took action in their own lives
Arcanetrance
May 2013
#11
Do you remember the incident in which US servicemen urinated on Afghan corpses?
LanternWaste
May 2013
#73
kick ass excellent article. "Few men actively fight against the system of rape."
seabeyond
May 2013
#68
??? i would actually have to make a statement in order to promote, as you suggest. nt
seabeyond
May 2013
#45
I don't disagree with anything written here, but I wonder how effective the phrasing and
geek tragedy
May 2013
#23
Well Jonathan Katz and Robert Jensen have been trying the soft sell for years with little progress.
redqueen
May 2013
#27
I can definitely see your point. I don't mean that the manly stuff should be validated, only
geek tragedy
May 2013
#49