Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

ismnotwasm

(42,674 posts)

16. When I was taking psych courses

Reply to redqueen (Reply #15)

Thu Sep 19, 2013, 04:59 PM

Sep 2013

One of my instructors was a Freudian analyst. He said that since common people couldn't afford Freud, Freud treated monied-to-royalty people's. it skewed what he could actually say, which is where some of his "hysteria" diagnosis came from. The professor said that Freud couldn't exactly put out that Earl so and so was raping his daughter, so he made diagnosis for the daughter

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Yes this is rape culture [View all] ismnotwasm Sep 2013 OP

k and r and 3. . 2. . . 1. . niyad Sep 2013 #1

sexual attraction to children is not normal or some choice period Arcanetrance Sep 2013 #2

3..., 2..., 1... R. Daneel Olivaw Sep 2013 #3

There are people actually trying to redefine hebephilia and pedophilia as a "kink" redqueen Sep 2013 #4

I have no problem shaming those assholes ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #5

Sorry apologists, but some preferences are not normal. Deep13 Sep 2013 #7

"Children, however, have always been off limits" - Not particularly true. Gravitycollapse Sep 2013 #8

What? (STRONG TRIGGER WARNING!) redqueen Sep 2013 #11

Historical standards are generally more strict about this than modern standards. Deep13 Sep 2013 #14

Interesting. redqueen Sep 2013 #15

When I was taking psych courses ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #16

That is interesting. Thanks. Nt seabeyond Sep 2013 #17

Yep. He went back and changed what he'd originally written. redqueen Sep 2013 #29

Not surprising, that was well into the modern era. Deep13 Sep 2013 #21

Actually, the idea that the Victorian era was characterized by sexual repression is a myth. redqueen Sep 2013 #28

But was the porn really all that representative? Deep13 Sep 2013 #30

I'm telling you, the repression was a myth. redqueen Sep 2013 #31

right. you said it well. nt seabeyond Sep 2013 #32

I'd like to read on that. Deep13 Sep 2013 #33

You are misquoting me. Deep13 Sep 2013 #12

This ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #13

that is where the problem lies. so much of the facts are ignored or denied to tell the story that seabeyond Sep 2013 #18

Interesting analysis BainsBane Sep 2013 #20

thanks Deep13 Sep 2013 #22

feelings and actions are very different things. Deep13 Sep 2013 #6

if it is like we argued with the 3 or 4 men that came in saying it was a biological urge and could seabeyond Sep 2013 #9

Culturally, it's shameful how we sexualize and fetishize women and children. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #10

Astounding how many people argued that pedophilia was natural BainsBane Sep 2013 #19

Ya. And I never thought much of clooney. Pitt, ya. Clooney? No way. BUT, seabeyond Sep 2013 #23

I'm a Vin Diesel kind of girl myself ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #24

Really? BainsBane Sep 2013 #25

That's why I deliberately used a trailer shot of Riddick 3 ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #26

Yep, yep and yep. redqueen Sep 2013 #27