Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Did you see this? [View all]redqueen
(115,186 posts)73. That one surprises me less than the anti-abortion shit allowed to stay here.
At least we had made a little headway with respect to abortion, once upon a time.
With porn and men's entitlement to women (and girls, too, obviously) we have never made one step in the progressive direction.
Oops I take that back... There are now a few states finally acting to curb revenge porn.
We need MacKinnon's and Dworkin's law re: porn enacted. Allow any woman harmed by porn to sue for damages. If pornsick people are so damned sure that no one is ever harmed by porn they should have absolutely no problem with it. Only problem is, pornographers know the truth, they have no cognitive dissonance to soothe with delusion... and they will fight that law with everything they have.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not when one denies choice to others. That is the definition of anti choice.
boston bean
Nov 2013
#2
post 7. you are wrong. again. and niceguy, every one of your posts have NOT supported
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#8
yes they can hold their position and be democrats. and yes, du can say.... we do not hold that
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#7
Some people just think women aren't entitled to as much of a right to bodily autonomy as a corpse is
redqueen
Nov 2013
#9
yup. on my hide, i was told i was supposed to talk to skinner about schoolgirls soiled panties
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#84
That was a ridiculous response by Skinner. And pitbullgirl's question was exactly on
Squinch
Nov 2013
#16
Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt and ask him if he was kidnapped
Squinch
Nov 2013
#20
And that one was PPR'd. But I am still reeling about the fact that the position here is that,
Squinch
Nov 2013
#22
And not understanding that it's just as bad as saying racists are OK, as long as they're polite.
Squinch
Nov 2013
#27
I too am extremely disturbed. I don't want to associate with a group or site that
boston bean
Nov 2013
#30
It is a biggie because it is so fundamental, and it is clear that there is simply no understanding
Squinch
Nov 2013
#34
Yeah, but the opinions of MRA types don't signify to me. I need to chew on this.
Squinch
Nov 2013
#46
Wow! THat's actually pretty cool. It's highly possible that you could meet your great, great
Squinch
Nov 2013
#51
No I can't imagine they would have lasted more than a day until admin got back on duty.
boston bean
Nov 2013
#37
Yes. Unless I see something that rescinds that point of view, my star will not be renewed.
Squinch
Nov 2013
#17
look people, we had a thread of mostly men say a woman who is 9 months preg should be denied a glass
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#54
That really should be a huge wake up call to anyone who thinks that misogyny is a right-wing thing.
redqueen
Nov 2013
#70
exactly redqueen. they do fool so many, because those people need things to stay the same, but....
seabeyond
Nov 2013
#71
The forced organ donation even in the face of other health problems is an apt analogy.
Squinch
Nov 2013
#62
Overtly rude is exactly what it is. It's offensive. No matter how nice someone says it.
boston bean
Nov 2013
#60
I can't see how someone who is anti-abortion (for everybody, not just for herself)
MadrasT
Nov 2013
#68