Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: 50 Actual Facts About Rape [View all]MyshkinCommaPrince
(611 posts)30. Question...
I hope it is not in poor taste for me to ask a question about how some of the information is stated in the list. I find this bit confusing, which may merely mean that my math skills are worse than I thought.
Chances an incarcerated person is raped in the U.S.: 1 in 10
Increase in chance that LGTB prisoner is raped: 15x greater chance
Was the "15x greater" calculated using the same base value as the 10%? Following links, the 15x value represents a 67% chance, so it's being based on 67/15 = 4.4666667, round up to 5. The article relating to the 10% statistic says "nearly one in 10 prisoners report having been raped", so there is some rounding in the 10%, but jumping from 5 to "nearly 10" is... a big jump. The 10% times 15 would be an overall 150% chance.
Either my math is wonky or the list presents these two items in a potentially misleading manner. Can anyone check my math/reasoning, on this? I definitely don't want to derail anything or diminish the importance of the posted data. If we're trying to inform, it's probably good to seek accuracy, particularly with something as important as this. Obvious inaccuracy is easily attacked by those who might seek to discredit the topic.
Aside from that question, thank you for the information. This helps contextualize the debates we saw here, a week or two ago.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
oh... or the many men that use decrease in rape as an excuse for us women not being angry... we
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#4
Anybody who thinks like that is clearly damaged, and deluded or very angry themselves
ismnotwasm
Dec 2013
#9
When certain members continually dismiss feminists as "prudish" or "sex negative"
BainsBane
Dec 2013
#47
bluntly they use those terms to denigrade womens sexuality. no different from slut shaming. and
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#48
+1. I would add to this that those certain members pretty much act with impunity...
YoungDemCA
Dec 2013
#61
they are being generous saying 2-8%. it is 2-3%. they included "unfounded" in that %. see exactly
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#5
"reluctance of the U.S. military to treat rape as a criminal offense," we heard it in the last round
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#13
i am getting dizzy seeing you here cheering and in the mens group dissing. nt
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#14
I'm for women's rights in all respects. I understand being more than just angry.
In_The_Wind
Dec 2013
#18
Back to where this conversation began: Rape of any woman, child or man is wrong.
In_The_Wind
Dec 2013
#29
They descend on threads like the one on 40 yrs of rape to champion one accused man
BainsBane
Dec 2013
#35
they are reported rapes, minus the rapes downgraded, and the rapes concluded unfounded and the rapes
seabeyond
Dec 2013
#72
Fact 51, if the man who rapes you is important, like Julian Assange, it can't be rape
BainsBane
Dec 2013
#67