Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

redqueen

(115,113 posts)
Fri Feb 14, 2014, 05:06 PM Feb 2014

Can we stop referring to women as "damaged"? (HOF THREAD) [View all]

I know it's probably just me, but that word cuts. It hurts. And it's not fair.

Those women who don't react the way one might expect in certain circumstances (circumstances that I won't detail, as most in this group will hopefully know what kinds of circumstances I'm referring to here)... they could have been abused. Or traumatized. Given the odds, it's undoubtedly a very safe bet that that is most likely the case. But "damaged"? What is the value in using that word?

We don't refer to men who have experienced trauma as "damaged" so can we please stop doing that to women? Is this an unreasonable request?

And if I ever hear "damaged goods" ...

Why anyone would use that term, or any woman repeat it as if it's not loaded, hurtful, and fucked up as all hell... I will simply never understand.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Can we stop referring to ...»Reply #0