Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

History of Feminism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 01:22 PM Jun 2012

Do you believe that religion is the historical root of misogyny? [View all]

And is this historical root of misogyny also the root of homophobia/transphobia?

If not, what other primary plausible historical reasons are responsible for the prevalence of misogyny throughout the ages?

I found this article posted below to be interesting and the premise to be valid, and am looking for more good reference material on ideas concerning the historical roots of misogyny, and would appreciate it if anyone could post this type of material if they know of some offhand.

Thanks.

Misogyny and Homophobia

There was and continues to be a profound connection between misogyny and homophobia in our culture. Misogyny is defined as a fear and hatred of women. It manifests itself psychologically in the repression of everything in the psyche that is tradition- ally connected with the feminine. Among other things, this includes all emotions, feelings of compassion, all spiritual feelings, all dependency, and all need of community. In the future I would prefer to refer to misogyny with the word “feminaphobia.”

Over sixty years ago, G. Rattrey Taylor in his classic book Sex in History (New York: Vanguard Press 1954, Chap. 4, pp.72ff.) attempted to expose some of the culturally conditioned attitudes on sexuality. He found a universal phenomenon in cultures based on a patriarchal principle. These cultures with few exceptions tend to combine a strongly subordinationist view of women with a repression and horror of male homosexual practices. The institution in today’s culture which continues to hold on to the clearest expression of that form of patriarchy, including its homophobia, is the Roman Catholic Church.

In contrast, those cultures based on a matriarchal principle are inclined to combine an enhancement of the status of women with a relative tolerance for male homosexual practices. Taylor concludes that the tradition of the Christian West has been fundamentally based on patriarchal culture. This may help to explain certain striking anomalies from an ethical viewpoint in that tradition.

One of the most remarkable of these anomalies is the almost complete disregard of lesbianism in western Christian tradition. Although the Holiness code in the Old Testament, for example, explicitly condemns under penalty of death male homosexual practices and female bestiality, no mention is made of female lesbian practices. (This should not be surprising when we recall that King David had reputedly a harem of nearly a thousand women.) Apart from a disputed reference to unnatural female acts by Paul in Romans 1:26, there is no other reference to female lesbian activity in Scripture and scarcely any at all in all the other documents of Christian tradition.

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nope. It seems to me religion just codified and sanctioned it. redqueen Jun 2012 #1
That's what I think, too. It's an historical expression of misogyny, not its cause. n/t pnwmom Jun 2012 #5
So, if I understand what you are saying correctly, Zorra Jun 2012 #7
Yep. redqueen Jun 2012 #10
i dont know that would be true. i dont know that in caveman time that structure would be either seabeyond Jun 2012 #11
Yeah, probably with the advent of agrarian society... redqueen Jun 2012 #15
Yes, I agree that it began with Tumbulu Jun 2012 #23
so true, so true, so true..... i love this. this is why i had a hard time seabeyond Jun 2012 #25
Thanks sea, I don't raise meat sheep though Tumbulu Jun 2012 #29
thank you for more info. seabeyond Jun 2012 #30
This makes a lot of sense. snot Jun 2012 #27
I agree. That seems to be the most reasonable explanation. Zorra Jun 2012 #17
I believe the Abrahamic, religions are the root of misogyny, Kalidurga Jun 2012 #2
Probably not but it's certainly been used by bigots to justify them. Warpy Jun 2012 #3
Yes libodem Jun 2012 #4
I take exception to the article's statement that: pnwmom Jun 2012 #6
That's a very valid point, IMO. nt Zorra Jun 2012 #8
I think that religions adopted misogyny Tumbulu Jun 2012 #9
male is completely dependent on the female for the life everlasting of the species seabeyond Jun 2012 #12
thanks sea Tumbulu Jun 2012 #28
good for you. me, not so much. lol. nt seabeyond Jun 2012 #31
The bible seemed to help with the adoption of misogyny quite a bit... Little Star Jun 2012 #14
But the Christian Bible and all the other writings reflect only Tumbulu Jun 2012 #21
Yep! Little Star Jun 2012 #22
A distinct possibility. And that would add a whole 'nother dimension to Zorra Jun 2012 #19
My 2 cents snot Jun 2012 #13
Good post & I agree. CrispyQ Jun 2012 #26
LGBT, Feminists, Homophobia & The Patriarchy... Little Star Jun 2012 #16
Well said. I agree, unequivocably. nt Zorra Jun 2012 #18
Dualism is the root of misogyny and.... chaska Jun 2012 #20
Yes, major religions in general have/are misogynist . MerryBlooms Jun 2012 #24
Whether they started it or not, they continue to propagate it. PassingFair Jun 2012 #32
No, it just does what it's good at. laconicsax Jun 2012 #33
Yes ismnotwasm Jun 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Do you believe that relig...»Reply #0