Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
17. I agree with it, but you CAN'T be a "visually assaulting terrorist" and a "colluding slave"
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 12:37 PM
Jul 2014

Last edited Thu Feb 24, 2022, 03:01 PM - Edit history (9)

at the same time.

Unfortunately, Hooks made her very legitimate argument a casualty of her own rhetorical overkill. Are you really "controlling your sexualization" if you wouldn't have a musical career without it -- that is, if you really DID have to rely on your musical talents for a living?

You see, I had this argument over thirty years ago about Madonna. I distinctly remember hearing Shining Star on the radio and wondering, "How the hell did SHE get a record contract?" My neighborhood wouldn't be wired for cable for a few more years, so the first time I actually laid eyes on her, she was on the cover of Time magazine -- with the headline "Why She's Hot."

She was hot because her male fans wanted her, while her female fans wanted to be her because males wanted her. They all said, "But it's different with her -- sure she has more sex appeal than talent, but it's HER sex appeal! Doesn't that make her a feminist?" I said, "No -- it makes her a pimp. And being your own pimp doesn't make you any less of a whore."

Beyonce isn't doing anything that Madonna through Miley Cyrus haven't -- including trying to pass it off it as feminism. If you sift through the ashes of Hooks's "friendly fire," you'll find that she mentioned "capitalist patriarchy." That's what Beyonce and her video pop tart "ancestors" have enslaved themselves to -- and it is most certainly NOT a "black thing."

More


rocktivity

I just saw that! ismnotwasm Jul 2014 #1
She is amazing. In_The_Wind Jul 2014 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #4
Take that Bill O'Reilly! mfcorey1 Jul 2014 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2014 #7
Lol. Thanks for the chuckle. This thread needed it. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #8
I really don't 'get' why every one fawns over her LittleGirl Jul 2014 #5
I like her because she is a strong woman who generally takes a stand for what is right. PeaceNikki Jul 2014 #6
That's great LittleGirl Jul 2014 #9
I think mercuryblues Jul 2014 #10
Yawn -- consider the source rocktivity Jul 2014 #11
What do you think of hooks's deconstructive argument that if Bey is actually in control of her image redqueen Jul 2014 #12
I tend to agree with it. It is why Third Wavers Support her. It is ironic. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #13
I do as well redqueen Jul 2014 #14
you are more tolerant than I, redqueen. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #15
What she is, beyond being a powerful woman ismnotwasm Jul 2014 #18
That she intrigues you, is fine by me, ism. She bores me. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #20
I agree with it, but you CAN'T be a "visually assaulting terrorist" and a "colluding slave" rocktivity Jul 2014 #17
I definitely agree with your analysis. redqueen Jul 2014 #19
it's NOT a "black thing." ... About now, I wish one of our black sisters would make an appearance Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2014 #21
Madonna is also a consummate business woman ismnotwasm Jul 2014 #22
Why did you call the criticism from hooks two months ago "the context"? redqueen Jul 2014 #16
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Beyonce Shuts Down Women ...»Reply #17