Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: Member Discussion ~ SOP (Statement of Purpose) [View all]iverglas
(38,549 posts)30. I suppose the really problematic ones
will just keep an eye on the forum and seize their opportunities.
The Latest page thing isn't entirely a matter of attracting disruptors. Often, people see something there that catches their eye (especially if it's a slow late night, for instance) and wander over and don't realize what forum they are in. (This used to happen all the time with the Guns forum; some sane person would post a thought in a thread with a topic that looked interesting and immediately be set upon by six or eight "pro-gun" types, then look up at the top of their monitor and go Eek! I'm in the gungeon! and hasten to escape.)
So somebody goes to Latest (I'm the same, I never do) and sees a thread containing something they disagree with ... like, a feminist thought or analysis ... and bungs their thoughts into the thread, never having read the SoP. Their thoughts don't coincide with the SoP. And there we are, distracted by and replying to something that is irrelevant or misogynist or something in between.
Maybe we should just avoid recommending threads in this group's forum.
bad editing fixed
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
don't want to be too fenced in that people aren't saying what they want or need
seabeyond
Apr 2012
#3
I think that the "safe haven" nature of the group could be a little more well-defined.
laconicsax
Apr 2012
#15
Just to clarify, I was in no way suggesting obvious misgoyny/disruption be given "benefit of doubt"
hlthe2b
Apr 2012
#19
I think that is a good idea... so having possibly read your post first, I'm going to pin it...
hlthe2b
Apr 2012
#25
Wouldn't having those posts on that page help people to find this forum and participate?
seabeyond
Apr 2012
#29
we could look, lol. nothing to be done. but sometimes people read subject line
seabeyond
Apr 2012
#33
I'm still not seeing where the problem is that needs to be addressed....
Violet_Crumble
Apr 2012
#40
The hosts of ASAH (Astrology, Spirituality, Alternative Health) have been able to keep
Tumbulu
Apr 2012
#41
maybe more so for people like me who haven't already been fighting the fight for decades.
seabeyond
Apr 2012
#39