- in legislation - and I now do it in all my own work.
Doing a quickie search at CanLII for "they shall" for an example finds this up top:
Sex Offender Information Registration Act, SC 2004, c 10
Consolidated Statutes of Canada — Canada (Federal)
... 5. (1) When a sex offender reports to a registration centre, they shall provide the following information to a person who collects information at the registration centre: ... (3) If a sex offender is required to report to a registration centre designated under this Act, they shall report in person. ... (2) If a sex offender is required to report to a registration centre designated under this Act, they shall report in person or in accordance with regulations made under paragraph
The meaning remains obvious, despite the technically incorrect grammar.
I've never thought it was really reasonable to try to change a language in such an extreme way as to invent a new word and try to get people to use it, especially for something as common and ingrained as a personal pronoun. Lots of people have always said "they" to refer to an unspecified third person, despite how all our elementary school teachers battled to get us not to do it (indicating the need for such a pronoun in the first place).
To get rid of he and she in English to refer to specific individuals ... if we wanted to ... that's something that is generations in the future.
Meanwhile, good on Sweden for all the voluntary stuff going on in all sectors of the society -- the corporate and associational sectors mentioned there are certainly excellent nuts to crack.
I'm not entirely sure that mixed bowling isn't going to disadvantage women, though ... and I'm afraid that gender neutral washrooms really and truly do. Women don't have equal social power, even in Sweden, and in places like bars and even schools and workplaces, women having no choice but to share intimate quarters like washrooms with men who may be strangers is not really appropriate, to my mind.
= new reply since forum marked as read