Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
20. I apologize for any offense
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 10:21 PM
Apr 2012

I am on your side. My argument is strictly rhetorical. But the rhetoric makes a difference. Here, at DU, we all use rhetorical devices to get our point across and I do not disassociate myself from that. I do it, too.

But I have a problem with this particular coinage. The word history has no gender specific root, to gentrify it has no purpose other than to make a gender neutral word into a gendered word.

I am being, as I often am on these forums, a bit of a pedant.

If you take offense to that, I grovel at your feet and apologize. I just think the word is silly, and I firmly believe that if people used it in popular culture it would be received precisely as that.

The more important argument is the lack of accuracy of women's part of history. That is the one battle we should all be fighting. My field is science and mathematics and the story of women there is both compelling and wonderful, in spite of them having to fight against gender bias.

But the history tells the real stories of these women. Like the first scientist to win two Nobel Prizes, Marie Curie. Of Henrietta Leavitt who worked for decades at the Harvard observatory and discovered one of the most important astronomical discoveries of all time and was directly responsible for Edwin Hubble, decades later, using her data for finding that the universe was expanding. Of Caroline Herschel, an astronomer of exquisite talent who worked with her brother, William Herschel and made astounding discoveries in the nineteenth century. Just in science, I could go on and on. Try Hypatia, another favorite of mine. Or Hildegard of Bingen. (Both of which were polymaths.)

There are countless women like these, women who have made profound differences in history. We only have to tell their stories, which are compelling and often played out under difficult cultural situations. It is these histories which make the case for feminism, not silly rhetorical games.

Tell the stories, the real stories, their histories. They are all the more compelling because of their gender. Why diminish that by calling it something else, especially something as silly as herstory. This is the real history.

Thanks.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the Canadian government has adopted "they" as third person singular iverglas Apr 2012 #1
I'm still trying to digest this article.... Little Star Apr 2012 #2
one does have to hand it to them, though iverglas Apr 2012 #4
It is a difficult problem to solve longship Apr 2012 #3
well, herstory ;) iverglas Apr 2012 #5
I think I made a case against "herstory" longship Apr 2012 #6
I think that maybe herstory has to do with boston bean Apr 2012 #7
let me try again iverglas Apr 2012 #8
Etymology of "history" longship Apr 2012 #10
excuse me iverglas Apr 2012 #11
I will let "herstory is history written from a feminist perspective" speak for itself longship Apr 2012 #13
do what you like iverglas Apr 2012 #16
I apologize for any offense longship Apr 2012 #20
you might have noticed the name of this forum is History of Feminism boston bean Apr 2012 #17
you are missing the point it talking specifically and not being asked to used generally. firstly seabeyond Apr 2012 #14
I agree 100% longship Apr 2012 #18
i dont use the word. if i am hearing right, and what i am seeing.... seabeyond Apr 2012 #19
No offense taken or delivered longship Apr 2012 #21
I appreciate your passion about this MadrasT Apr 2012 #23
I, too, have moderated my opinion longship Apr 2012 #25
"lobbying for parents to be able to choose any name for their children" Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #9
it's fairly common in European countries iverglas Apr 2012 #12
Of course. What constitutes a "valid public concern" is by no means universally agreed upon. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #15
chuckles iverglas Apr 2012 #26
I make an exception for Kaidan Alenko. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #27
I had no idea that anyone regulated naming. MadrasT Apr 2012 #24
"Intel Dual Core"...? BlueIris Apr 2012 #22
To be fair, some of these may be Palins. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Sweden’s New Gender-Neutr...»Reply #20