Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
25. I, too, have moderated my opinion
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 01:09 AM
Apr 2012

But not too much. I would hate like hell to give the opposition any reason to make a specifically rhetorical argument against something which we all should recognize as one of the unalienable rights.

The opposition is very good at this and I feel very strongly that we don't need to give them any gifts.

This last few months we see what they have in store for women. They are not just playing games. This is what they are about and they will likely only back down if they think that it will hurt them in Nov., which it will.

But this is what they are about. To oppose them, one has to phrase things with some care. Any misstep could bounce back at us. Silly rhetoric like herstory does just that. I can just see the Repukes outlawing hersterectomies, etc. It is a tactic ripe for ridicule, as it should be.

Enough is enough. There is only history, and it has nothing to do with gender bias other than the way it is reported. But that is the one thing we all can influence. Women's history is as rich and compelling as any. Tell the stories and people will listen.

Calling it herstory does nothing without the stories. So why even relabel it? Just tell the fucking stories. They are awfully good, after all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the Canadian government has adopted "they" as third person singular iverglas Apr 2012 #1
I'm still trying to digest this article.... Little Star Apr 2012 #2
one does have to hand it to them, though iverglas Apr 2012 #4
It is a difficult problem to solve longship Apr 2012 #3
well, herstory ;) iverglas Apr 2012 #5
I think I made a case against "herstory" longship Apr 2012 #6
I think that maybe herstory has to do with boston bean Apr 2012 #7
let me try again iverglas Apr 2012 #8
Etymology of "history" longship Apr 2012 #10
excuse me iverglas Apr 2012 #11
I will let "herstory is history written from a feminist perspective" speak for itself longship Apr 2012 #13
do what you like iverglas Apr 2012 #16
I apologize for any offense longship Apr 2012 #20
you might have noticed the name of this forum is History of Feminism boston bean Apr 2012 #17
you are missing the point it talking specifically and not being asked to used generally. firstly seabeyond Apr 2012 #14
I agree 100% longship Apr 2012 #18
i dont use the word. if i am hearing right, and what i am seeing.... seabeyond Apr 2012 #19
No offense taken or delivered longship Apr 2012 #21
I appreciate your passion about this MadrasT Apr 2012 #23
I, too, have moderated my opinion longship Apr 2012 #25
"lobbying for parents to be able to choose any name for their children" Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #9
it's fairly common in European countries iverglas Apr 2012 #12
Of course. What constitutes a "valid public concern" is by no means universally agreed upon. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #15
chuckles iverglas Apr 2012 #26
I make an exception for Kaidan Alenko. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #27
I had no idea that anyone regulated naming. MadrasT Apr 2012 #24
"Intel Dual Core"...? BlueIris Apr 2012 #22
To be fair, some of these may be Palins. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Sweden’s New Gender-Neutr...»Reply #25