Okay, I'm a tad confused but I'm also new so that might be the problemI

[NYC_SKP]

7. I see. That wasn't TOO bad. But I would probably have voted to hide it.

That member is a prolific poster and a staunch advocate for President Obama. She has posted high quality, well sourced posts for as long as I can remember and as a result been accused of being a paid poster.

Such accusations are rude and we used to remove them regularly if posted against her or others.

If a member doesn't like another member's posts, Democratic Underground provides an ignore feature so that you can chose to never see that other person's posts.

Just click on the red x to the right of the member's name.

Either that, or be more careful about being nice and civil versus insinuating that a person is a shill.

I can see a juror going either way on that one, but knowing how much badgering she's taken I'd have hidden it.