Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
34. Your logic is in error.
Fri May 31, 2013, 08:39 PM
May 2013

A law that is passed for one reason can have unintended results. It is possible that the hollow gun ownership requirement may, or may not, have also caused, a drop in crime, even though the intention was as a publicity stunt.

As a publicity stunt it worked, as Kennesaw has been talked about for that law for the 31 years since then.

It is impossible to prove that the law had any effect, one way or another, on crime. I will not get sucked into that discussion.

I'm pro 2nd ammend...but this is stupid. nt clarice May 2013 #1
Millions of stupid gun nuts/cultists out there, and that is the problem. Hoyt May 2013 #3
Wow, that's a VERY broad brush you are painting with. nt clarice May 2013 #4
Extensive experience, mostly with right wing bigoted gunners. Hoyt May 2013 #9
No! I said the law was stupid. I just don't like stereotypes. nt clarice May 2013 #10
If it fits. . . . . . . Go to a gun show or store, and see what you think. Hoyt May 2013 #11
www.theliberalgunclub.com clarice May 2013 #12
Yeah right. Go to a gun show, take some photos. Hoyt May 2013 #13
I don't judge people by their appearance.nt clarice May 2013 #14
Does not surprise me. I guess you think these militia men are Democrats? Hoyt May 2013 #15
I have no idea what their political affiliation is. And I don't presume to know.nt clarice May 2013 #16
I'd be willing to bet you DO know what their political affiliation is. And you know you do. Squinch May 2013 #18
Um...ok.....next? nt clarice May 2013 #26
stinking up my thread on Oklahoma tordadoes and climate change CreekDog May 2013 #27
Um...ok.....next? nt clarice May 2013 #28
That's typical of that poster clarice. rl6214 May 2013 #21
Thanks for the welcome.... clarice May 2013 #25
Post removed Post removed May 2013 #23
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #24
Bizarre. Laelth May 2013 #2
That's Nucla CO Autumn May 2013 #5
I wish they would pass that in my town. bluedigger May 2013 #7
I believe that it the town where they hold a annual prairie dog shoot. El Supremo May 2013 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #22
Looks like the RW version of government tryanny by forcing one to support the gun industry. freshwest May 2013 #8
you MUST, unless you don't want to jimmy the one May 2013 #17
Bunch of idiots being idiotic. Squinch May 2013 #19
I think that's as ridiculous as passing an ordinance banning all guns. rl6214 May 2013 #20
Kennesaw, GA, did that in 1982. GreenStormCloud May 2013 #29
publicity stunt? jimmy the one May 2013 #30
Others can claim what they want. GreenStormCloud May 2013 #31
MG v Kennesaw stats jimmy the one May 2013 #32
Your logic is in error. GreenStormCloud May 2013 #34
my logic is fine jimmy the one Jun 2013 #36
I am under no obligation to support Kopel or anybody else. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #39
kennesaw's mayor lowballed, er, underreported jimmy the one May 2013 #33
While I believe everyone should have the means to protect their family, ileus May 2013 #35
What exactly do you mean by "personal protection devices"? Starboard Tack Jun 2013 #37
Dan Baum in "Gun Guys" makes the same point. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #38
Thank you! Starboard Tack Jun 2013 #40
You have given me an idea for a thread. GreenStormCloud Jun 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Nucla, Colo. Passes Ordin...»Reply #34